Cargando…
Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study
BACKGROUND: There is limited prospective evidence on the association between meat consumption and many common, non-cancerous health outcomes. We examined associations of meat intake with risk of 25 common conditions (other than cancer). METHODS: We used data from 474,985 middle-aged adults recruited...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33648505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01922-9 |
_version_ | 1783658918971441152 |
---|---|
author | Papier, Keren Fensom, Georgina K. Knuppel, Anika Appleby, Paul N. Tong, Tammy Y. N. Schmidt, Julie A. Travis, Ruth C. Key, Timothy J. Perez-Cornago, Aurora |
author_facet | Papier, Keren Fensom, Georgina K. Knuppel, Anika Appleby, Paul N. Tong, Tammy Y. N. Schmidt, Julie A. Travis, Ruth C. Key, Timothy J. Perez-Cornago, Aurora |
author_sort | Papier, Keren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is limited prospective evidence on the association between meat consumption and many common, non-cancerous health outcomes. We examined associations of meat intake with risk of 25 common conditions (other than cancer). METHODS: We used data from 474,985 middle-aged adults recruited into the UK Biobank study between 2006 and 2010 and followed up until 2017 (mean follow-up 8.0 years) with available information on meat intake at baseline (collected via touchscreen questionnaire), and linked hospital admissions and mortality data. For a large sub-sample (~ 69,000), dietary intakes were re-measured three or more times using an online, 24-h recall questionnaire. RESULTS: On average, participants who reported consuming meat regularly (three or more times per week) had more adverse health behaviours and characteristics than participants who consumed meat less regularly, and most of the positive associations observed for meat consumption and health risks were substantially attenuated after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). In multi-variable adjusted (including BMI) Cox regression models corrected for multiple testing, higher consumption of unprocessed red and processed meat combined was associated with higher risks of ischaemic heart disease (hazard ratio (HRs) per 70 g/day higher intake 1.15, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1.07–1.23), pneumonia (1.31, 1.18–1.44), diverticular disease (1.19, 1.11–1.28), colon polyps (1.10, 1.06–1.15), and diabetes (1.30, 1.20–1.42); results were similar for unprocessed red meat and processed meat intakes separately. Higher consumption of unprocessed red meat alone was associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA: HR per 50 g/day higher intake 0.80, 95% CIs 0.72–0.90). Higher poultry meat intake was associated with higher risks of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (HR per 30 g/day higher intake 1.17, 95% CIs 1.09–1.26), gastritis and duodenitis (1.12, 1.05–1.18), diverticular disease (1.10, 1.04–1.17), gallbladder disease (1.11, 1.04–1.19), and diabetes (1.14, 1.07–1.21), and a lower IDA risk (0.83, 0.76–0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Higher unprocessed red meat, processed meat, and poultry meat consumption was associated with higher risks of several common conditions; higher BMI accounted for a substantial proportion of these increased risks suggesting that residual confounding or mediation by adiposity might account for some of these remaining associations. Higher unprocessed red meat and poultry meat consumption was associated with lower IDA risk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-01922-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7923515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79235152021-03-02 Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study Papier, Keren Fensom, Georgina K. Knuppel, Anika Appleby, Paul N. Tong, Tammy Y. N. Schmidt, Julie A. Travis, Ruth C. Key, Timothy J. Perez-Cornago, Aurora BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: There is limited prospective evidence on the association between meat consumption and many common, non-cancerous health outcomes. We examined associations of meat intake with risk of 25 common conditions (other than cancer). METHODS: We used data from 474,985 middle-aged adults recruited into the UK Biobank study between 2006 and 2010 and followed up until 2017 (mean follow-up 8.0 years) with available information on meat intake at baseline (collected via touchscreen questionnaire), and linked hospital admissions and mortality data. For a large sub-sample (~ 69,000), dietary intakes were re-measured three or more times using an online, 24-h recall questionnaire. RESULTS: On average, participants who reported consuming meat regularly (three or more times per week) had more adverse health behaviours and characteristics than participants who consumed meat less regularly, and most of the positive associations observed for meat consumption and health risks were substantially attenuated after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). In multi-variable adjusted (including BMI) Cox regression models corrected for multiple testing, higher consumption of unprocessed red and processed meat combined was associated with higher risks of ischaemic heart disease (hazard ratio (HRs) per 70 g/day higher intake 1.15, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1.07–1.23), pneumonia (1.31, 1.18–1.44), diverticular disease (1.19, 1.11–1.28), colon polyps (1.10, 1.06–1.15), and diabetes (1.30, 1.20–1.42); results were similar for unprocessed red meat and processed meat intakes separately. Higher consumption of unprocessed red meat alone was associated with a lower risk of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA: HR per 50 g/day higher intake 0.80, 95% CIs 0.72–0.90). Higher poultry meat intake was associated with higher risks of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (HR per 30 g/day higher intake 1.17, 95% CIs 1.09–1.26), gastritis and duodenitis (1.12, 1.05–1.18), diverticular disease (1.10, 1.04–1.17), gallbladder disease (1.11, 1.04–1.19), and diabetes (1.14, 1.07–1.21), and a lower IDA risk (0.83, 0.76–0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Higher unprocessed red meat, processed meat, and poultry meat consumption was associated with higher risks of several common conditions; higher BMI accounted for a substantial proportion of these increased risks suggesting that residual confounding or mediation by adiposity might account for some of these remaining associations. Higher unprocessed red meat and poultry meat consumption was associated with lower IDA risk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-01922-9. BioMed Central 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7923515/ /pubmed/33648505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01922-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Papier, Keren Fensom, Georgina K. Knuppel, Anika Appleby, Paul N. Tong, Tammy Y. N. Schmidt, Julie A. Travis, Ruth C. Key, Timothy J. Perez-Cornago, Aurora Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title | Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title_full | Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title_fullStr | Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title_full_unstemmed | Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title_short | Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study |
title_sort | meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the uk biobank study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33648505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01922-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papierkeren meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT fensomgeorginak meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT knuppelanika meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT applebypauln meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT tongtammyyn meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT schmidtjuliea meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT travisruthc meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT keytimothyj meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy AT perezcornagoaurora meatconsumptionandriskof25commonconditionsoutcomewideanalysesin475000menandwomenintheukbiobankstudy |