Cargando…

Relationship between the face scale for rating of perceived exertion and physiological parameters in older adults and patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: The Borg scale is used to determine exercise intensity in rehabilitation but can be difficult for older adults to understand. By contrast, face scale that are used to evaluate pain are much easier to understand thanks to the inclusion of illustrations. On the other hand, the prevalence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nashimoto, Satoshi, Morishita, Shinichiro, Iida, Susumu, Hotta, Kazuki, Tsubaki, Atsuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650814
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14759
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Borg scale is used to determine exercise intensity in rehabilitation but can be difficult for older adults to understand. By contrast, face scale that are used to evaluate pain are much easier to understand thanks to the inclusion of illustrations. On the other hand, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age. This study aimed to determine the validity of the face scale for rating perceived exertion (RPE‐face scale) in older adults and patients with AF during cardiopulmonary exercise test. Furthermore, the relationship between face scale and anaerobic threshold (AT) was also investigated. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with sinus rhythm (SR) (74 men, 16 women) and 22 with AF were enrolled. Participants’ responses were recorded using the RPE‐face scale and compared with exercise intensity, heart rate, oxygen uptake, and minute ventilation during the exercise test. We determined the AT by the V‐slope method. RESULTS: Correlations between RPE‐face scale and physiological parameters were significantly positive for men with SR and women with SR and AF. However, differences in the correlation coefficient between age and SR or AF were not statistically significant. The cutoff value for AT of the RPE‐face scale was “4,” showing high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The RPE‐face scale can be used to determine the intensity of physical exercise, unaffected by age, gender, SR, or AF.