Cargando…

Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis

Rice blast is a global threat to food security with up to 50% yield losses. Panicle blast is a more severe form of rice blast and the response of rice plant to leaf and panicle blast is distinct in different genotypes. To understand the specific response of rice in panicle blast, transcriptome analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Vishesh, Jain, Priyanka, Venkadesan, Sureshkumar, Karkute, Suhas Gorakh, Bhati, Jyotika, Abdin, Malik Zainul, Sevanthi, Amitha Mithra, Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra, Chaturvedi, Krishna Kumar, Rai, Anil, Sharma, Tilak Raj, Solanke, Amolkumar U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020301
_version_ 1783659038238572544
author Kumar, Vishesh
Jain, Priyanka
Venkadesan, Sureshkumar
Karkute, Suhas Gorakh
Bhati, Jyotika
Abdin, Malik Zainul
Sevanthi, Amitha Mithra
Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra
Chaturvedi, Krishna Kumar
Rai, Anil
Sharma, Tilak Raj
Solanke, Amolkumar U.
author_facet Kumar, Vishesh
Jain, Priyanka
Venkadesan, Sureshkumar
Karkute, Suhas Gorakh
Bhati, Jyotika
Abdin, Malik Zainul
Sevanthi, Amitha Mithra
Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra
Chaturvedi, Krishna Kumar
Rai, Anil
Sharma, Tilak Raj
Solanke, Amolkumar U.
author_sort Kumar, Vishesh
collection PubMed
description Rice blast is a global threat to food security with up to 50% yield losses. Panicle blast is a more severe form of rice blast and the response of rice plant to leaf and panicle blast is distinct in different genotypes. To understand the specific response of rice in panicle blast, transcriptome analysis of blast resistant cultivar Tetep, and susceptible cultivar HP2216 was carried out using RNA-Seq approach after 48, 72 and 96 h of infection with Magnaporthe oryzae along with mock inoculation. Transcriptome data analysis of infected panicle tissues revealed that 3553 genes differentially expressed in HP2216 and 2491 genes in Tetep, which must be the responsible factor behind the differential disease response. The defense responsive genes are involved mainly in defense pathways namely, hormonal regulation, synthesis of reactive oxygen species, secondary metabolites and cell wall modification. The common differentially expressed genes in both the cultivars were defense responsive transcription factors, NBS-LRR genes, kinases, pathogenesis related genes and peroxidases. In Tetep, cell wall strengthening pathway represented by PMR5, dirigent, tubulin, cell wall proteins, chitinases, and proteases was found to be specifically enriched. Additionally, many novel genes having DOMON, VWF, and PCaP1 domains which are specific to cell membrane were highly expressed only in Tetep post infection, suggesting their role in panicle blast resistance. Thus, our study shows that panicle blast resistance is a complex phenomenon contributed by early defense response through ROS production and detoxification, MAPK and LRR signaling, accumulation of antimicrobial compounds and secondary metabolites, and cell wall strengthening to prevent the entry and spread of the fungi. The present investigation provided valuable candidate genes that can unravel the mechanisms of panicle blast resistance and help in the rice blast breeding program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7924189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79241892021-03-03 Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis Kumar, Vishesh Jain, Priyanka Venkadesan, Sureshkumar Karkute, Suhas Gorakh Bhati, Jyotika Abdin, Malik Zainul Sevanthi, Amitha Mithra Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra Chaturvedi, Krishna Kumar Rai, Anil Sharma, Tilak Raj Solanke, Amolkumar U. Genes (Basel) Article Rice blast is a global threat to food security with up to 50% yield losses. Panicle blast is a more severe form of rice blast and the response of rice plant to leaf and panicle blast is distinct in different genotypes. To understand the specific response of rice in panicle blast, transcriptome analysis of blast resistant cultivar Tetep, and susceptible cultivar HP2216 was carried out using RNA-Seq approach after 48, 72 and 96 h of infection with Magnaporthe oryzae along with mock inoculation. Transcriptome data analysis of infected panicle tissues revealed that 3553 genes differentially expressed in HP2216 and 2491 genes in Tetep, which must be the responsible factor behind the differential disease response. The defense responsive genes are involved mainly in defense pathways namely, hormonal regulation, synthesis of reactive oxygen species, secondary metabolites and cell wall modification. The common differentially expressed genes in both the cultivars were defense responsive transcription factors, NBS-LRR genes, kinases, pathogenesis related genes and peroxidases. In Tetep, cell wall strengthening pathway represented by PMR5, dirigent, tubulin, cell wall proteins, chitinases, and proteases was found to be specifically enriched. Additionally, many novel genes having DOMON, VWF, and PCaP1 domains which are specific to cell membrane were highly expressed only in Tetep post infection, suggesting their role in panicle blast resistance. Thus, our study shows that panicle blast resistance is a complex phenomenon contributed by early defense response through ROS production and detoxification, MAPK and LRR signaling, accumulation of antimicrobial compounds and secondary metabolites, and cell wall strengthening to prevent the entry and spread of the fungi. The present investigation provided valuable candidate genes that can unravel the mechanisms of panicle blast resistance and help in the rice blast breeding program. MDPI 2021-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7924189/ /pubmed/33672641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020301 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Vishesh
Jain, Priyanka
Venkadesan, Sureshkumar
Karkute, Suhas Gorakh
Bhati, Jyotika
Abdin, Malik Zainul
Sevanthi, Amitha Mithra
Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra
Chaturvedi, Krishna Kumar
Rai, Anil
Sharma, Tilak Raj
Solanke, Amolkumar U.
Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title_full Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title_fullStr Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title_short Understanding Rice-Magnaporthe Oryzae Interaction in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice under Panicle Blast Infection Using a Time-Course Transcriptome Analysis
title_sort understanding rice-magnaporthe oryzae interaction in resistant and susceptible cultivars of rice under panicle blast infection using a time-course transcriptome analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020301
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarvishesh understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT jainpriyanka understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT venkadesansureshkumar understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT karkutesuhasgorakh understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT bhatijyotika understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT abdinmalikzainul understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT sevanthiamithamithra understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT mishradwijeshchandra understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT chaturvedikrishnakumar understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT raianil understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT sharmatilakraj understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis
AT solankeamolkumaru understandingricemagnaportheoryzaeinteractioninresistantandsusceptiblecultivarsofriceunderpanicleblastinfectionusingatimecoursetranscriptomeanalysis