Cargando…
Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown high efficacy of multiple vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19), and recent studies have shown the vaccines are also effective against infection. Evidence for the effect of each of these vaccines on ability to transmit the virus is also beginni...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.21252415 |
_version_ | 1783659059770032128 |
---|---|
author | Lipsitch, Marc Kahn, Rebecca |
author_facet | Lipsitch, Marc Kahn, Rebecca |
author_sort | Lipsitch, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown high efficacy of multiple vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19), and recent studies have shown the vaccines are also effective against infection. Evidence for the effect of each of these vaccines on ability to transmit the virus is also beginning to emerge. We describe an approach to estimate these vaccines’ effects on viral positivity, a prevalence measure which under the reasonable assumption that vaccinated individuals who become infected are no more infectious than unvaccinated individuals forms a lower bound on efficacy against transmission. Specifically, we recommend separate analysis of positive tests triggered by symptoms (usually the primary outcome) and cross-sectional prevalence of positive tests obtained regardless of symptoms. The odds ratio of carriage for vaccine vs. placebo provides an unbiased estimate of vaccine effectiveness against viral positivity, under certain assumptions, and we show through simulations that likely departures from these assumptions will only modestly bias this estimate. Applying this approach to published data from the RCT of the Moderna vaccine, we estimate that one dose of vaccine reduces the potential for transmission by at least 61%, possibly considerably more. We describe how these approaches can be translated into observational studies of vaccine effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7924301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79243012021-03-03 Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission Lipsitch, Marc Kahn, Rebecca medRxiv Article Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown high efficacy of multiple vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19), and recent studies have shown the vaccines are also effective against infection. Evidence for the effect of each of these vaccines on ability to transmit the virus is also beginning to emerge. We describe an approach to estimate these vaccines’ effects on viral positivity, a prevalence measure which under the reasonable assumption that vaccinated individuals who become infected are no more infectious than unvaccinated individuals forms a lower bound on efficacy against transmission. Specifically, we recommend separate analysis of positive tests triggered by symptoms (usually the primary outcome) and cross-sectional prevalence of positive tests obtained regardless of symptoms. The odds ratio of carriage for vaccine vs. placebo provides an unbiased estimate of vaccine effectiveness against viral positivity, under certain assumptions, and we show through simulations that likely departures from these assumptions will only modestly bias this estimate. Applying this approach to published data from the RCT of the Moderna vaccine, we estimate that one dose of vaccine reduces the potential for transmission by at least 61%, possibly considerably more. We describe how these approaches can be translated into observational studies of vaccine effectiveness. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7924301/ /pubmed/33655276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.21252415 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Lipsitch, Marc Kahn, Rebecca Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title | Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title_full | Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title_fullStr | Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title_short | Interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
title_sort | interpreting vaccine efficacy trial results for infection and transmission |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.25.21252415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipsitchmarc interpretingvaccineefficacytrialresultsforinfectionandtransmission AT kahnrebecca interpretingvaccineefficacytrialresultsforinfectionandtransmission |