Cargando…

Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception

PURPOSE: Calligraphy is the most unique form of artistic expression in Chinese culture. However, most studies that used calligraphy as a research object only explored its artistic value from an artistic perspective. Thus, we know little about the information processing and influencing factors of cal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Tinghu, Wang, Ping, Zhang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679143
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S290649
_version_ 1783659089145888768
author Kang, Tinghu
Wang, Ping
Zhang, Hui
author_facet Kang, Tinghu
Wang, Ping
Zhang, Hui
author_sort Kang, Tinghu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Calligraphy is the most unique form of artistic expression in Chinese culture. However, most studies that used calligraphy as a research object only explored its artistic value from an artistic perspective. Thus, we know little about the information processing and influencing factors of calligraphic perception. Thus, we aimed to determine whether there are differences in attention distribution due to cognitive style in the process of calligraphic perception. METHODS: The calligraphy of Lan Ting Ji Xu, which is known as the first running script in the history of Chinese calligraphy, was selected as the experimental material. The study used eye movement experiments to explore the differences in cognitive styles of attention distribution when perceiving calligraphy, through the analysis of eye movement data of participants. RESULTS: The results showed that field-independent participants had more fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccade angle when they perceived calligraphic works than those who were field-dependent. In other words, field-independent individuals spend more attention resources in the perceptual process. In addition, through data analysis, it was found that fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccade angle in the middle position of calligraphy are larger than the data on both sides of the calligraphy. In other words, when individuals perceive calligraphy, the content in the middle position can attract more attention resources than those on both sides. CONCLUSION: We found that individuals with different cognitive styles have differences in attention distribution in the process of perceiving calligraphy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7924436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79244362021-03-04 Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception Kang, Tinghu Wang, Ping Zhang, Hui Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Calligraphy is the most unique form of artistic expression in Chinese culture. However, most studies that used calligraphy as a research object only explored its artistic value from an artistic perspective. Thus, we know little about the information processing and influencing factors of calligraphic perception. Thus, we aimed to determine whether there are differences in attention distribution due to cognitive style in the process of calligraphic perception. METHODS: The calligraphy of Lan Ting Ji Xu, which is known as the first running script in the history of Chinese calligraphy, was selected as the experimental material. The study used eye movement experiments to explore the differences in cognitive styles of attention distribution when perceiving calligraphy, through the analysis of eye movement data of participants. RESULTS: The results showed that field-independent participants had more fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccade angle when they perceived calligraphic works than those who were field-dependent. In other words, field-independent individuals spend more attention resources in the perceptual process. In addition, through data analysis, it was found that fixation duration, number of fixations, and saccade angle in the middle position of calligraphy are larger than the data on both sides of the calligraphy. In other words, when individuals perceive calligraphy, the content in the middle position can attract more attention resources than those on both sides. CONCLUSION: We found that individuals with different cognitive styles have differences in attention distribution in the process of perceiving calligraphy. Dove 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7924436/ /pubmed/33679143 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S290649 Text en © 2021 Kang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kang, Tinghu
Wang, Ping
Zhang, Hui
Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title_full Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title_fullStr Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title_short Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception
title_sort cognitive style differences in attention distribution regarding calligraphic perception
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679143
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S290649
work_keys_str_mv AT kangtinghu cognitivestyledifferencesinattentiondistributionregardingcalligraphicperception
AT wangping cognitivestyledifferencesinattentiondistributionregardingcalligraphicperception
AT zhanghui cognitivestyledifferencesinattentiondistributionregardingcalligraphicperception