Cargando…
Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks
Non-experts have long made important contributions to machine learning (ML) by contributing training data, and recent work has shown that non-experts can also help with feature engineering by suggesting novel predictive features. However, non-experts have only contributed features to prediction task...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.296 |
_version_ | 1783659111117750272 |
---|---|
author | Bagrow, James P. |
author_facet | Bagrow, James P. |
author_sort | Bagrow, James P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-experts have long made important contributions to machine learning (ML) by contributing training data, and recent work has shown that non-experts can also help with feature engineering by suggesting novel predictive features. However, non-experts have only contributed features to prediction tasks already posed by experienced ML practitioners. Here we study how non-experts can design prediction tasks themselves, what types of tasks non-experts will design, and whether predictive models can be automatically trained on data sourced for their tasks. We use a crowdsourcing platform where non-experts design predictive tasks that are then categorized and ranked by the crowd. Crowdsourced data are collected for top-ranked tasks and predictive models are then trained and evaluated automatically using those data. We show that individuals without ML experience can collectively construct useful datasets and that predictive models can be learned on these datasets, but challenges remain. The prediction tasks designed by non-experts covered a broad range of domains, from politics and current events to health behavior, demographics, and more. Proper instructions are crucial for non-experts, so we also conducted a randomized trial to understand how different instructions may influence the types of prediction tasks being proposed. In general, understanding better how non-experts can contribute to ML can further leverage advances in Automatic machine learning and has important implications as ML continues to drive workplace automation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7924542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79245422021-04-02 Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks Bagrow, James P. PeerJ Comput Sci Human-Computer Interaction Non-experts have long made important contributions to machine learning (ML) by contributing training data, and recent work has shown that non-experts can also help with feature engineering by suggesting novel predictive features. However, non-experts have only contributed features to prediction tasks already posed by experienced ML practitioners. Here we study how non-experts can design prediction tasks themselves, what types of tasks non-experts will design, and whether predictive models can be automatically trained on data sourced for their tasks. We use a crowdsourcing platform where non-experts design predictive tasks that are then categorized and ranked by the crowd. Crowdsourced data are collected for top-ranked tasks and predictive models are then trained and evaluated automatically using those data. We show that individuals without ML experience can collectively construct useful datasets and that predictive models can be learned on these datasets, but challenges remain. The prediction tasks designed by non-experts covered a broad range of domains, from politics and current events to health behavior, demographics, and more. Proper instructions are crucial for non-experts, so we also conducted a randomized trial to understand how different instructions may influence the types of prediction tasks being proposed. In general, understanding better how non-experts can contribute to ML can further leverage advances in Automatic machine learning and has important implications as ML continues to drive workplace automation. PeerJ Inc. 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7924542/ /pubmed/33816947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.296 Text en © 2020 Bagrow https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Human-Computer Interaction Bagrow, James P. Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title | Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title_full | Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title_fullStr | Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title_short | Democratizing AI: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
title_sort | democratizing ai: non-expert design of prediction tasks |
topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bagrowjamesp democratizingainonexpertdesignofpredictiontasks |