Cargando…
Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816893 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240 |
_version_ | 1783659146872094720 |
---|---|
author | Elmenreich, Wilfried Moll, Philipp Theuermann, Sebastian Lux, Mathias |
author_facet | Elmenreich, Wilfried Moll, Philipp Theuermann, Sebastian Lux, Mathias |
author_sort | Elmenreich, Wilfried |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open and easily accessible results, in particular, reproducing an experiment should not require too much effort. The results of the survey are then used to formulate guidelines for making research results reproducible. In addition, this article explores four approaches based on software tools that could bring forward reproducibility in research results. After a general analysis of tools, three examples are further investigated based on actual research projects which are used to evaluate previously introduced tools. Results indicate that the evaluated tools contribute well to making simulation results reproducible but due to conflicting requirements, none of the presented solutions fulfills all intended goals perfectly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7924710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79247102021-04-02 Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker Elmenreich, Wilfried Moll, Philipp Theuermann, Sebastian Lux, Mathias PeerJ Comput Sci Data Science This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open and easily accessible results, in particular, reproducing an experiment should not require too much effort. The results of the survey are then used to formulate guidelines for making research results reproducible. In addition, this article explores four approaches based on software tools that could bring forward reproducibility in research results. After a general analysis of tools, three examples are further investigated based on actual research projects which are used to evaluate previously introduced tools. Results indicate that the evaluated tools contribute well to making simulation results reproducible but due to conflicting requirements, none of the presented solutions fulfills all intended goals perfectly. PeerJ Inc. 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7924710/ /pubmed/33816893 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240 Text en © 2019 Elmenreich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Data Science Elmenreich, Wilfried Moll, Philipp Theuermann, Sebastian Lux, Mathias Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title | Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title_full | Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title_fullStr | Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title_full_unstemmed | Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title_short | Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker |
title_sort | making simulation results reproducible—survey, guidelines, and examples based on gradle and docker |
topic | Data Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816893 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmenreichwilfried makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker AT mollphilipp makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker AT theuermannsebastian makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker AT luxmathias makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker |