Cargando…

Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker

This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmenreich, Wilfried, Moll, Philipp, Theuermann, Sebastian, Lux, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816893
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240
_version_ 1783659146872094720
author Elmenreich, Wilfried
Moll, Philipp
Theuermann, Sebastian
Lux, Mathias
author_facet Elmenreich, Wilfried
Moll, Philipp
Theuermann, Sebastian
Lux, Mathias
author_sort Elmenreich, Wilfried
collection PubMed
description This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open and easily accessible results, in particular, reproducing an experiment should not require too much effort. The results of the survey are then used to formulate guidelines for making research results reproducible. In addition, this article explores four approaches based on software tools that could bring forward reproducibility in research results. After a general analysis of tools, three examples are further investigated based on actual research projects which are used to evaluate previously introduced tools. Results indicate that the evaluated tools contribute well to making simulation results reproducible but due to conflicting requirements, none of the presented solutions fulfills all intended goals perfectly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7924710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79247102021-04-02 Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker Elmenreich, Wilfried Moll, Philipp Theuermann, Sebastian Lux, Mathias PeerJ Comput Sci Data Science This article addresses two research questions related to reproducibility within the context of research related to computer science. First, a survey on reproducibility addressed to researchers in the academic and private sectors is described and evaluated. The survey indicates a strong need for open and easily accessible results, in particular, reproducing an experiment should not require too much effort. The results of the survey are then used to formulate guidelines for making research results reproducible. In addition, this article explores four approaches based on software tools that could bring forward reproducibility in research results. After a general analysis of tools, three examples are further investigated based on actual research projects which are used to evaluate previously introduced tools. Results indicate that the evaluated tools contribute well to making simulation results reproducible but due to conflicting requirements, none of the presented solutions fulfills all intended goals perfectly. PeerJ Inc. 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7924710/ /pubmed/33816893 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240 Text en © 2019 Elmenreich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Data Science
Elmenreich, Wilfried
Moll, Philipp
Theuermann, Sebastian
Lux, Mathias
Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title_full Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title_fullStr Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title_full_unstemmed Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title_short Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker
title_sort making simulation results reproducible—survey, guidelines, and examples based on gradle and docker
topic Data Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816893
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.240
work_keys_str_mv AT elmenreichwilfried makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker
AT mollphilipp makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker
AT theuermannsebastian makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker
AT luxmathias makingsimulationresultsreproduciblesurveyguidelinesandexamplesbasedongradleanddocker