Cargando…

Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures

Introduction Electronic Health Record (EHR) adoption rates for office-based physicians doubled between 2008 and 2015, from 42% to 89%, and more than 60% of all office-based physicians achieved meaningful use by 2016. The US government has paid billions of dollars in incentives to promote EHR meaning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alammari, Duaa, Banta, Jim E, Shah, Huma, Reibling, Ellen, Ramadan, Majed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665057
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13036
_version_ 1783659169419624448
author Alammari, Duaa
Banta, Jim E
Shah, Huma
Reibling, Ellen
Ramadan, Majed
author_facet Alammari, Duaa
Banta, Jim E
Shah, Huma
Reibling, Ellen
Ramadan, Majed
author_sort Alammari, Duaa
collection PubMed
description Introduction Electronic Health Record (EHR) adoption rates for office-based physicians doubled between 2008 and 2015, from 42% to 89%, and more than 60% of all office-based physicians achieved meaningful use by 2016. The US government has paid billions of dollars in incentives to promote EHR meaningful use. Nonetheless, evidence linking EHR meaningful use to quality measures improvements is limited. Objective This study aims to examine the relationship between EHR meaningful use and capabilities among four quality measures in an ambulatory healthcare setting. Study design A cross-sectional study design of the 2015-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey dataset. Methods We used adjusted multivariate regression models to examine associations between (a) EHR meaningful use and (b) 10 EHR-computerized capabilities, with four quality measures (blood pressure screening, tobacco use screening, obesity screening, and obesity education). Results We analyzed 30,787 office visits, representing an annual estimate of 680 million national office visits. Results showed that 95% of visits were to offices meeting EHR meaningful use criteria. We found one positive association between EHR meaningful use and obesity screening (OR= 3.5, 95% CI [1.742-6.917]). We also found eight positive associations between EHR capabilities and three quality measures (screening for blood pressure and obesity, and obesity education). These associations included five EHR-computerized capabilities: “record patient problem list”, “view lab results”, “Reminders for interventions/screening”, “Order lab results” and “Recording clinical notes”. No EHR capability was associated with screening for tobacco use. Conclusions We looked at a handful of screening-oriented quality measures in ambulatory healthcare and found limited associations with EHR meaningful use but multiple positively significant associations with EHR capabilities. Although EHR meaningful use has become more commonly used, offering substantial administrative efficiency over paper records, current patterns of EHR meaningful use do not always appear to translate into a better quality of care in physician offices. However, quality measures used represent limited procedures for a handful of specific conditions and not the overall healthcare aspect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7924813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79248132021-03-03 Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures Alammari, Duaa Banta, Jim E Shah, Huma Reibling, Ellen Ramadan, Majed Cureus Public Health Introduction Electronic Health Record (EHR) adoption rates for office-based physicians doubled between 2008 and 2015, from 42% to 89%, and more than 60% of all office-based physicians achieved meaningful use by 2016. The US government has paid billions of dollars in incentives to promote EHR meaningful use. Nonetheless, evidence linking EHR meaningful use to quality measures improvements is limited. Objective This study aims to examine the relationship between EHR meaningful use and capabilities among four quality measures in an ambulatory healthcare setting. Study design A cross-sectional study design of the 2015-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey dataset. Methods We used adjusted multivariate regression models to examine associations between (a) EHR meaningful use and (b) 10 EHR-computerized capabilities, with four quality measures (blood pressure screening, tobacco use screening, obesity screening, and obesity education). Results We analyzed 30,787 office visits, representing an annual estimate of 680 million national office visits. Results showed that 95% of visits were to offices meeting EHR meaningful use criteria. We found one positive association between EHR meaningful use and obesity screening (OR= 3.5, 95% CI [1.742-6.917]). We also found eight positive associations between EHR capabilities and three quality measures (screening for blood pressure and obesity, and obesity education). These associations included five EHR-computerized capabilities: “record patient problem list”, “view lab results”, “Reminders for interventions/screening”, “Order lab results” and “Recording clinical notes”. No EHR capability was associated with screening for tobacco use. Conclusions We looked at a handful of screening-oriented quality measures in ambulatory healthcare and found limited associations with EHR meaningful use but multiple positively significant associations with EHR capabilities. Although EHR meaningful use has become more commonly used, offering substantial administrative efficiency over paper records, current patterns of EHR meaningful use do not always appear to translate into a better quality of care in physician offices. However, quality measures used represent limited procedures for a handful of specific conditions and not the overall healthcare aspect. Cureus 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7924813/ /pubmed/33665057 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13036 Text en Copyright © 2021, Alammari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Alammari, Duaa
Banta, Jim E
Shah, Huma
Reibling, Ellen
Ramadan, Majed
Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title_full Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title_fullStr Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title_full_unstemmed Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title_short Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures
title_sort meaningful use of electronic health records and ambulatory healthcare quality measures
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665057
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13036
work_keys_str_mv AT alammariduaa meaningfuluseofelectronichealthrecordsandambulatoryhealthcarequalitymeasures
AT bantajime meaningfuluseofelectronichealthrecordsandambulatoryhealthcarequalitymeasures
AT shahhuma meaningfuluseofelectronichealthrecordsandambulatoryhealthcarequalitymeasures
AT reiblingellen meaningfuluseofelectronichealthrecordsandambulatoryhealthcarequalitymeasures
AT ramadanmajed meaningfuluseofelectronichealthrecordsandambulatoryhealthcarequalitymeasures