Cargando…
Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing
This study compared standard of care testing (SOC) to BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNplus). PNplus detects 15 bacteria with semiquantitative log bin values, 7 antibiotic resistance markers, three atypical bacteria (AB), and eight viral classes directly from bronchoalveolar lavage-like s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5 |
_version_ | 1783659170369634304 |
---|---|
author | Ginocchio, Christine C. Garcia-Mondragon, Carolina Mauerhofer, Barbara Rindlisbacher, Cory |
author_facet | Ginocchio, Christine C. Garcia-Mondragon, Carolina Mauerhofer, Barbara Rindlisbacher, Cory |
author_sort | Ginocchio, Christine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared standard of care testing (SOC) to BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNplus). PNplus detects 15 bacteria with semiquantitative log bin values, 7 antibiotic resistance markers, three atypical bacteria (AB), and eight viral classes directly from bronchoalveolar lavage-like specimens (BLS) and sputum-like specimens (SLS). Fifty-two laboratories from 13 European countries and Israel tested 1234 BLS and 1242 SLS with PNplus and SOC. Detection rates and number of pathogens/samples were compared for PNplus pathogens. PNplus bin values and SOC quantities were compared. Three thousand two hundred sixty-two bacteria in PNplus were detected by PNplus and/or SOC. SOC detected 57.1% compared to 95.8% for PNplus (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus semiquantitative bin values were less than SOC, equal to SOC, or greater than SOC in 5.1%, 25.4%, and 69.6% of results, respectively. PNplus bin values were on average ≥ 1 log than SOC values (58.5% 1–2 logs; 11.0% 3–4 logs). PNplus identified 98.2% of MRSA and SOC 55.6%. SOC detected 73/103 AB (70.9%) and 134/631 viruses (21.2%). PNplus detected 93/103 AB (90.3%) and 618/631 viruses (97.9%) (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus and SOC mean number of pathogens/samples were 1.99 and 1.44, respectively. All gram-negative resistance markers were detected. PNplus and SOC results were fully or partially concordant for 49.1% and 26.4% of specimens, respectively. PNplus was highly sensitive and detected more potential pneumonia pathogens than SOC. Semiquantification may assist in understanding pathogen significance. As PNplus generates results in approximately 1 h, PNplus has potential to direct antimicrobial therapy in near real time and improve antimicrobial stewardship and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7924818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79248182021-03-03 Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing Ginocchio, Christine C. Garcia-Mondragon, Carolina Mauerhofer, Barbara Rindlisbacher, Cory Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article This study compared standard of care testing (SOC) to BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNplus). PNplus detects 15 bacteria with semiquantitative log bin values, 7 antibiotic resistance markers, three atypical bacteria (AB), and eight viral classes directly from bronchoalveolar lavage-like specimens (BLS) and sputum-like specimens (SLS). Fifty-two laboratories from 13 European countries and Israel tested 1234 BLS and 1242 SLS with PNplus and SOC. Detection rates and number of pathogens/samples were compared for PNplus pathogens. PNplus bin values and SOC quantities were compared. Three thousand two hundred sixty-two bacteria in PNplus were detected by PNplus and/or SOC. SOC detected 57.1% compared to 95.8% for PNplus (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus semiquantitative bin values were less than SOC, equal to SOC, or greater than SOC in 5.1%, 25.4%, and 69.6% of results, respectively. PNplus bin values were on average ≥ 1 log than SOC values (58.5% 1–2 logs; 11.0% 3–4 logs). PNplus identified 98.2% of MRSA and SOC 55.6%. SOC detected 73/103 AB (70.9%) and 134/631 viruses (21.2%). PNplus detected 93/103 AB (90.3%) and 618/631 viruses (97.9%) (p ≤ 0.0001). PNplus and SOC mean number of pathogens/samples were 1.99 and 1.44, respectively. All gram-negative resistance markers were detected. PNplus and SOC results were fully or partially concordant for 49.1% and 26.4% of specimens, respectively. PNplus was highly sensitive and detected more potential pneumonia pathogens than SOC. Semiquantification may assist in understanding pathogen significance. As PNplus generates results in approximately 1 h, PNplus has potential to direct antimicrobial therapy in near real time and improve antimicrobial stewardship and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7924818/ /pubmed/33655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ginocchio, Christine C. Garcia-Mondragon, Carolina Mauerhofer, Barbara Rindlisbacher, Cory Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title | Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title_full | Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title_fullStr | Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title_short | Multinational evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel as compared to standard of care testing |
title_sort | multinational evaluation of the biofire® filmarray® pneumonia plus panel as compared to standard of care testing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04195-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ginocchiochristinec multinationalevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelascomparedtostandardofcaretesting AT garciamondragoncarolina multinationalevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelascomparedtostandardofcaretesting AT mauerhoferbarbara multinationalevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelascomparedtostandardofcaretesting AT rindlisbachercory multinationalevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelascomparedtostandardofcaretesting AT multinationalevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelascomparedtostandardofcaretesting |