Cargando…

Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update

Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furino, Claudio, Boscia, Francesco, Reibaldi, Michele, Alessio, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654168
_version_ 1783659206014926848
author Furino, Claudio
Boscia, Francesco
Reibaldi, Michele
Alessio, Giovanni
author_facet Furino, Claudio
Boscia, Francesco
Reibaldi, Michele
Alessio, Giovanni
author_sort Furino, Claudio
collection PubMed
description Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or corticosteroids therapies), and surgical removal are currently available. Although laser has been considered as the gold standard for many years, over the past several years vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) have become first-line therapy. However, many patients do not adequately respond to them. With the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices, steroids have gained a presence in the management of the DME. We review and update the role of anti-VEGF and intravitreal sustained-release corticosteroid management of DME. According to the currently available scientific evidence, the choice of one anti-VEGF over another critically depends on the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While aflibercept may be the drug of choice in low baseline BCVA, the three anti-VEGFs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) provided similar functional outcomes when the baseline BCVA was higher. DEX implants are a valuable option for treating DME, although they are usually seen as a second choice, particularly in those eyes that have an insufficient response to anti-VEGF. The new evidence suggested that, in eyes that did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to a DEX implant at the time to 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections provided better functional outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79250232021-03-08 Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update Furino, Claudio Boscia, Francesco Reibaldi, Michele Alessio, Giovanni J Ophthalmol Review Article Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or corticosteroids therapies), and surgical removal are currently available. Although laser has been considered as the gold standard for many years, over the past several years vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) have become first-line therapy. However, many patients do not adequately respond to them. With the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices, steroids have gained a presence in the management of the DME. We review and update the role of anti-VEGF and intravitreal sustained-release corticosteroid management of DME. According to the currently available scientific evidence, the choice of one anti-VEGF over another critically depends on the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While aflibercept may be the drug of choice in low baseline BCVA, the three anti-VEGFs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) provided similar functional outcomes when the baseline BCVA was higher. DEX implants are a valuable option for treating DME, although they are usually seen as a second choice, particularly in those eyes that have an insufficient response to anti-VEGF. The new evidence suggested that, in eyes that did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to a DEX implant at the time to 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections provided better functional outcomes. Hindawi 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7925023/ /pubmed/33688431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654168 Text en Copyright © 2021 Claudio Furino et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Furino, Claudio
Boscia, Francesco
Reibaldi, Michele
Alessio, Giovanni
Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title_full Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title_fullStr Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title_full_unstemmed Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title_short Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update
title_sort intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema: an update
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654168
work_keys_str_mv AT furinoclaudio intravitrealtherapyfordiabeticmacularedemaanupdate
AT bosciafrancesco intravitrealtherapyfordiabeticmacularedemaanupdate
AT reibaldimichele intravitrealtherapyfordiabeticmacularedemaanupdate
AT alessiogiovanni intravitrealtherapyfordiabeticmacularedemaanupdate