Cargando…

Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekiguchi, Masau, Kakugawa, Yasuo, Ikematsu, Hiroaki, Hotta, Kinichi, Konda, Kenichi, Tanaka, Yusaku, Takamaru, Hiroyuki, Yamada, Masayoshi, Sakamoto, Taku, Saito, Yutaka, Imai, Kenichiro, Ito, Sayo, Koga, Yoshikatsu, Iwasaki, Motoki, Murakami, Yoshitaka, Matsuda, Takahisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939384
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319
_version_ 1783659222679945216
author Sekiguchi, Masau
Kakugawa, Yasuo
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Hotta, Kinichi
Konda, Kenichi
Tanaka, Yusaku
Takamaru, Hiroyuki
Yamada, Masayoshi
Sakamoto, Taku
Saito, Yutaka
Imai, Kenichiro
Ito, Sayo
Koga, Yoshikatsu
Iwasaki, Motoki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Matsuda, Takahisa
author_facet Sekiguchi, Masau
Kakugawa, Yasuo
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Hotta, Kinichi
Konda, Kenichi
Tanaka, Yusaku
Takamaru, Hiroyuki
Yamada, Masayoshi
Sakamoto, Taku
Saito, Yutaka
Imai, Kenichiro
Ito, Sayo
Koga, Yoshikatsu
Iwasaki, Motoki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Matsuda, Takahisa
author_sort Sekiguchi, Masau
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using baseline individual characteristics and its combination with FIT for detecting ACN. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective cohort in Izu Oshima, Japan, included asymptomatic individuals age 40–79 years who underwent both 2-day quantitative FIT and screening colonoscopy. The 8-point risk score, calculated based on age, sex, CRC family history, body mass index, and smoking history, was assessed. Colonoscopy results were used as reference. RESULTS: Overall, 1,191 individuals were included, and 112 had ACN. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) for ACN were 17.9%–33.9% (4.9%–22.0% for right-sided ACN) and 91.8%–97.6%, respectively. The risk score's c-statistic for ACN was 0.66, and combining the score (cutoff: 5 points) with 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) yielded a sensitivity and specificity for ACN of 46.4%–56.3% (43.9%–48.8% for right-sided ACN) and 76.6%–80.8%, respectively. The specificity of the risk score and FIT combination for all adenomatous lesions was 82.4%–86.4%. DISCUSSION: The 8-point risk score remarkably increased the sensitivity for ACN, particularly for right-sided ACN. Although the specificity decreased, it was still maintained at a relatively high level. The risk score and FIT combination has the potential to become a viable noninvasive CRC screening option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79251332021-03-04 Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup Sekiguchi, Masau Kakugawa, Yasuo Ikematsu, Hiroaki Hotta, Kinichi Konda, Kenichi Tanaka, Yusaku Takamaru, Hiroyuki Yamada, Masayoshi Sakamoto, Taku Saito, Yutaka Imai, Kenichiro Ito, Sayo Koga, Yoshikatsu Iwasaki, Motoki Murakami, Yoshitaka Matsuda, Takahisa Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using baseline individual characteristics and its combination with FIT for detecting ACN. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective cohort in Izu Oshima, Japan, included asymptomatic individuals age 40–79 years who underwent both 2-day quantitative FIT and screening colonoscopy. The 8-point risk score, calculated based on age, sex, CRC family history, body mass index, and smoking history, was assessed. Colonoscopy results were used as reference. RESULTS: Overall, 1,191 individuals were included, and 112 had ACN. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) for ACN were 17.9%–33.9% (4.9%–22.0% for right-sided ACN) and 91.8%–97.6%, respectively. The risk score's c-statistic for ACN was 0.66, and combining the score (cutoff: 5 points) with 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) yielded a sensitivity and specificity for ACN of 46.4%–56.3% (43.9%–48.8% for right-sided ACN) and 76.6%–80.8%, respectively. The specificity of the risk score and FIT combination for all adenomatous lesions was 82.4%–86.4%. DISCUSSION: The 8-point risk score remarkably increased the sensitivity for ACN, particularly for right-sided ACN. Although the specificity decreased, it was still maintained at a relatively high level. The risk score and FIT combination has the potential to become a viable noninvasive CRC screening option. Wolters Kluwer 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7925133/ /pubmed/33939384 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Sekiguchi, Masau
Kakugawa, Yasuo
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Hotta, Kinichi
Konda, Kenichi
Tanaka, Yusaku
Takamaru, Hiroyuki
Yamada, Masayoshi
Sakamoto, Taku
Saito, Yutaka
Imai, Kenichiro
Ito, Sayo
Koga, Yoshikatsu
Iwasaki, Motoki
Murakami, Yoshitaka
Matsuda, Takahisa
Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title_full Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title_fullStr Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title_short Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
title_sort risk stratification score improves sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia in colorectal cancer screening: the oshima study workgroup
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939384
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319
work_keys_str_mv AT sekiguchimasau riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT kakugawayasuo riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT ikematsuhiroaki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT hottakinichi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT kondakenichi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT tanakayusaku riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT takamaruhiroyuki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT yamadamasayoshi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT sakamototaku riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT saitoyutaka riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT imaikenichiro riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT itosayo riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT kogayoshikatsu riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT iwasakimotoki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT murakamiyoshitaka riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup
AT matsudatakahisa riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup