Cargando…
Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup
INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939384 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319 |
_version_ | 1783659222679945216 |
---|---|
author | Sekiguchi, Masau Kakugawa, Yasuo Ikematsu, Hiroaki Hotta, Kinichi Konda, Kenichi Tanaka, Yusaku Takamaru, Hiroyuki Yamada, Masayoshi Sakamoto, Taku Saito, Yutaka Imai, Kenichiro Ito, Sayo Koga, Yoshikatsu Iwasaki, Motoki Murakami, Yoshitaka Matsuda, Takahisa |
author_facet | Sekiguchi, Masau Kakugawa, Yasuo Ikematsu, Hiroaki Hotta, Kinichi Konda, Kenichi Tanaka, Yusaku Takamaru, Hiroyuki Yamada, Masayoshi Sakamoto, Taku Saito, Yutaka Imai, Kenichiro Ito, Sayo Koga, Yoshikatsu Iwasaki, Motoki Murakami, Yoshitaka Matsuda, Takahisa |
author_sort | Sekiguchi, Masau |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using baseline individual characteristics and its combination with FIT for detecting ACN. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective cohort in Izu Oshima, Japan, included asymptomatic individuals age 40–79 years who underwent both 2-day quantitative FIT and screening colonoscopy. The 8-point risk score, calculated based on age, sex, CRC family history, body mass index, and smoking history, was assessed. Colonoscopy results were used as reference. RESULTS: Overall, 1,191 individuals were included, and 112 had ACN. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) for ACN were 17.9%–33.9% (4.9%–22.0% for right-sided ACN) and 91.8%–97.6%, respectively. The risk score's c-statistic for ACN was 0.66, and combining the score (cutoff: 5 points) with 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) yielded a sensitivity and specificity for ACN of 46.4%–56.3% (43.9%–48.8% for right-sided ACN) and 76.6%–80.8%, respectively. The specificity of the risk score and FIT combination for all adenomatous lesions was 82.4%–86.4%. DISCUSSION: The 8-point risk score remarkably increased the sensitivity for ACN, particularly for right-sided ACN. Although the specificity decreased, it was still maintained at a relatively high level. The risk score and FIT combination has the potential to become a viable noninvasive CRC screening option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7925133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79251332021-03-04 Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup Sekiguchi, Masau Kakugawa, Yasuo Ikematsu, Hiroaki Hotta, Kinichi Konda, Kenichi Tanaka, Yusaku Takamaru, Hiroyuki Yamada, Masayoshi Sakamoto, Taku Saito, Yutaka Imai, Kenichiro Ito, Sayo Koga, Yoshikatsu Iwasaki, Motoki Murakami, Yoshitaka Matsuda, Takahisa Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods with higher sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) alone are warranted. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of a risk stratification score calculated using baseline individual characteristics and its combination with FIT for detecting ACN. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective cohort in Izu Oshima, Japan, included asymptomatic individuals age 40–79 years who underwent both 2-day quantitative FIT and screening colonoscopy. The 8-point risk score, calculated based on age, sex, CRC family history, body mass index, and smoking history, was assessed. Colonoscopy results were used as reference. RESULTS: Overall, 1,191 individuals were included, and 112 had ACN. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) for ACN were 17.9%–33.9% (4.9%–22.0% for right-sided ACN) and 91.8%–97.6%, respectively. The risk score's c-statistic for ACN was 0.66, and combining the score (cutoff: 5 points) with 1-/2-day FIT (cutoff: 50–200 ng Hb/mL) yielded a sensitivity and specificity for ACN of 46.4%–56.3% (43.9%–48.8% for right-sided ACN) and 76.6%–80.8%, respectively. The specificity of the risk score and FIT combination for all adenomatous lesions was 82.4%–86.4%. DISCUSSION: The 8-point risk score remarkably increased the sensitivity for ACN, particularly for right-sided ACN. Although the specificity decreased, it was still maintained at a relatively high level. The risk score and FIT combination has the potential to become a viable noninvasive CRC screening option. Wolters Kluwer 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7925133/ /pubmed/33939384 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Sekiguchi, Masau Kakugawa, Yasuo Ikematsu, Hiroaki Hotta, Kinichi Konda, Kenichi Tanaka, Yusaku Takamaru, Hiroyuki Yamada, Masayoshi Sakamoto, Taku Saito, Yutaka Imai, Kenichiro Ito, Sayo Koga, Yoshikatsu Iwasaki, Motoki Murakami, Yoshitaka Matsuda, Takahisa Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title | Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title_full | Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title_fullStr | Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title_short | Risk Stratification Score Improves Sensitivity for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Oshima Study Workgroup |
title_sort | risk stratification score improves sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia in colorectal cancer screening: the oshima study workgroup |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939384 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sekiguchimasau riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT kakugawayasuo riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT ikematsuhiroaki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT hottakinichi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT kondakenichi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT tanakayusaku riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT takamaruhiroyuki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT yamadamasayoshi riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT sakamototaku riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT saitoyutaka riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT imaikenichiro riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT itosayo riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT kogayoshikatsu riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT iwasakimotoki riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT murakamiyoshitaka riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup AT matsudatakahisa riskstratificationscoreimprovessensitivityforadvancedcolorectalneoplasiaincolorectalcancerscreeningtheoshimastudyworkgroup |