Cargando…

Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Existing studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and implementation of inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther, Geerlings, Jasmijn A, Muntingh, Anna DT, Scholten, Willemijn D, Maarsingh, Otto R, van Straten, Annemieke, Batelaan, Neeltje M, van Meijel, Berno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23200
_version_ 1783659224999395328
author Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
author_facet Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
author_sort Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Existing studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and implementation of interventions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the GET READY relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in general practice. METHODS: Semistructured interviews (N=26) and focus group interviews (N=2) with patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) in the Netherlands were performed. Patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders and their MHPs who participated in the GET READY study were interviewed individually. Findings from the interviews were tested in focus group interviews with patients and MHPs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were positive about the program because it created awareness of relapse risks. Lack of motivation, lack of recognizability, lack of support from the MHP, and symptom severity (too low or too high) appeared to be limiting factors in the use of the program. MHPs play a crucial role in motivating and supporting patients in relapse prevention. The perspectives of patients and MHPs were largely in accordance, although they had different perspectives concerning responsibilities for taking initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the GET READY program was challenging. Guidance from MHPs should be offered for relapse prevention programs based on eHealth. Both MHPs and patients should align their expectations concerning responsibilities in advance to ensure optimal usage. Usage of blended relapse prevention programs may be further enhanced by diagnosis-specific programs and easily accessible support from MHPs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79251442021-03-05 Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther Geerlings, Jasmijn A Muntingh, Anna DT Scholten, Willemijn D Maarsingh, Otto R van Straten, Annemieke Batelaan, Neeltje M van Meijel, Berno JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Existing studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of patients and professionals concerning relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in primary care. User opinions should be considered when optimizing the use and implementation of interventions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the GET READY relapse prevention programs for patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders in general practice. METHODS: Semistructured interviews (N=26) and focus group interviews (N=2) with patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) in the Netherlands were performed. Patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders and their MHPs who participated in the GET READY study were interviewed individually. Findings from the interviews were tested in focus group interviews with patients and MHPs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were positive about the program because it created awareness of relapse risks. Lack of motivation, lack of recognizability, lack of support from the MHP, and symptom severity (too low or too high) appeared to be limiting factors in the use of the program. MHPs play a crucial role in motivating and supporting patients in relapse prevention. The perspectives of patients and MHPs were largely in accordance, although they had different perspectives concerning responsibilities for taking initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the GET READY program was challenging. Guidance from MHPs should be offered for relapse prevention programs based on eHealth. Both MHPs and patients should align their expectations concerning responsibilities in advance to ensure optimal usage. Usage of blended relapse prevention programs may be further enhanced by diagnosis-specific programs and easily accessible support from MHPs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6 JMIR Publications 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7925144/ /pubmed/33591277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23200 Text en ©Esther Krijnen-de Bruin, Jasmijn A Geerlings, Anna DT Muntingh, Willemijn D Scholten, Otto R Maarsingh, Annemieke van Straten, Neeltje M Batelaan, Berno van Meijel. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 16.02.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Krijnen-de Bruin, Esther
Geerlings, Jasmijn A
Muntingh, Anna DT
Scholten, Willemijn D
Maarsingh, Otto R
van Straten, Annemieke
Batelaan, Neeltje M
van Meijel, Berno
Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_full Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_short Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study
title_sort evaluation of a blended relapse prevention program for anxiety and depression in general practice: qualitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23200
work_keys_str_mv AT krijnendebruinesther evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT geerlingsjasmijna evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT muntinghannadt evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT scholtenwillemijnd evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT maarsinghottor evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT vanstratenannemieke evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT batelaanneeltjem evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy
AT vanmeijelberno evaluationofablendedrelapsepreventionprogramforanxietyanddepressioningeneralpracticequalitativestudy