Cargando…

Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review

AIMS: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are locally aggressive lesions typically found in the long bones of children and adolescents. A variety of management strategies have been reported to be effective in the treatment of these lesions. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bavan, Luckshman, Wijendra, Asanka, Kothari, Alpesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.22.BJO-2020-0168
_version_ 1783659233480278016
author Bavan, Luckshman
Wijendra, Asanka
Kothari, Alpesh
author_facet Bavan, Luckshman
Wijendra, Asanka
Kothari, Alpesh
author_sort Bavan, Luckshman
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are locally aggressive lesions typically found in the long bones of children and adolescents. A variety of management strategies have been reported to be effective in the treatment of these lesions. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of current strategies for the management of primary ABCs of the long bones. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was performed to identify all articles relating to the management of primary ABCs. Studies required a minimum 12-month follow-up and case series reporting on under ten participants were not included. RESULTS: A total of 28 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included in this review, and all but one were retrospective in design. Due to heterogeneity in study design, treatment, and outcome reporting, data synthesis and group comparison was not possible. The most common treatment option reported on was surgical curettage with or without a form of adjuvant therapy, followed by injection-based therapies. Of the 594 patients treated with curettage across 17 studies, 86 (14.4%) failed to heal or experienced a recurrence. Similar outcomes were reported for 57 (14.70%) of the 387 patients treated with injection therapy across 12 studies. Only one study directly compared curettage with injection therapy (polidocanol), randomizing 94 patients into both treatment groups. This study was at risk of bias and provided low-quality evidence of a lack of difference between the two interventions, reporting success rates of 93.3% and 84.8% for injection and surgical treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: While both surgery and sclerotherapy are widely implemented for treatment of ABCs, there is currently no good quality evidence to support the use of one option over the other. There is a need for prospective multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions for the treatment of ABCs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):125–133.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79252082021-03-04 Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review Bavan, Luckshman Wijendra, Asanka Kothari, Alpesh Bone Jt Open Oncology AIMS: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are locally aggressive lesions typically found in the long bones of children and adolescents. A variety of management strategies have been reported to be effective in the treatment of these lesions. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of current strategies for the management of primary ABCs of the long bones. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was performed to identify all articles relating to the management of primary ABCs. Studies required a minimum 12-month follow-up and case series reporting on under ten participants were not included. RESULTS: A total of 28 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included in this review, and all but one were retrospective in design. Due to heterogeneity in study design, treatment, and outcome reporting, data synthesis and group comparison was not possible. The most common treatment option reported on was surgical curettage with or without a form of adjuvant therapy, followed by injection-based therapies. Of the 594 patients treated with curettage across 17 studies, 86 (14.4%) failed to heal or experienced a recurrence. Similar outcomes were reported for 57 (14.70%) of the 387 patients treated with injection therapy across 12 studies. Only one study directly compared curettage with injection therapy (polidocanol), randomizing 94 patients into both treatment groups. This study was at risk of bias and provided low-quality evidence of a lack of difference between the two interventions, reporting success rates of 93.3% and 84.8% for injection and surgical treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: While both surgery and sclerotherapy are widely implemented for treatment of ABCs, there is currently no good quality evidence to support the use of one option over the other. There is a need for prospective multicentre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions for the treatment of ABCs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):125–133. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7925208/ /pubmed/33622046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.22.BJO-2020-0168 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bavan, Luckshman
Wijendra, Asanka
Kothari, Alpesh
Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title_full Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title_short Efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy of treatment interventions for primary aneurysmal bone cysts: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.22.BJO-2020-0168
work_keys_str_mv AT bavanluckshman efficacyoftreatmentinterventionsforprimaryaneurysmalbonecystsasystematicreview
AT wijendraasanka efficacyoftreatmentinterventionsforprimaryaneurysmalbonecystsasystematicreview
AT kotharialpesh efficacyoftreatmentinterventionsforprimaryaneurysmalbonecystsasystematicreview