Cargando…
Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of age, gender, baseline strength, and selected candidate polymorphisms on maximal strength training (MST) adaptations. METHODS: A total of 49 subjects (22 men and 27 women) aged 20–76 years, divided into five age groups, completed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.636972 |
_version_ | 1783659308755451904 |
---|---|
author | Kittilsen, Hans Torvild Goleva-Fjellet, Sannija Freberg, Baard Ingegerdsson Nicolaisen, Iver Støa, Eva Maria Bratland-Sanda, Solfrid Helgerud, Jan Wang, Eivind Sæbø, Mona Støren, Øyvind |
author_facet | Kittilsen, Hans Torvild Goleva-Fjellet, Sannija Freberg, Baard Ingegerdsson Nicolaisen, Iver Støa, Eva Maria Bratland-Sanda, Solfrid Helgerud, Jan Wang, Eivind Sæbø, Mona Støren, Øyvind |
author_sort | Kittilsen, Hans Torvild |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of age, gender, baseline strength, and selected candidate polymorphisms on maximal strength training (MST) adaptations. METHODS: A total of 49 subjects (22 men and 27 women) aged 20–76 years, divided into five age groups, completed an 8 weeks MST intervention. Each MST session consisted of 4 sets with 4 repetitions at ∼85–90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) intensity in leg-press, three times per week. 1RM was tested pre and post the intervention and blood samples were drawn to genotype candidate polymorphisms ACE I/D (rs1799752), ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739), and PPARGC1A Gly482Ser (rs8192678). RESULTS: All age groups increased leg-press 1RM (p < 0.01), with a mean improvement of 24.2 ± 14.0%. There were no differences in improvements between the five age groups or between male and female participants, and there were no non-responders. Baseline strength status did not correlate with 1RM improvements. PPARGC1A rs8192678 T allele carriers had a 15% higher age- and gender corrected baseline 1RM than the CC genotype (p < 0.05). C allele carriers improved 1RM (%) by 34.2% more than homozygotes for the T allele (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report improvement in leg-press maximal strength regardless of gender, baseline strength status in all age groups. The present study is also first to demonstrate an association between the PPARGC1A rs8192678 and maximal strength and its trainability in a moderately trained cohort. MST may be beneficial for good health and performance of all healthy individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7925619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79256192021-03-04 Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups Kittilsen, Hans Torvild Goleva-Fjellet, Sannija Freberg, Baard Ingegerdsson Nicolaisen, Iver Støa, Eva Maria Bratland-Sanda, Solfrid Helgerud, Jan Wang, Eivind Sæbø, Mona Støren, Øyvind Front Physiol Physiology PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of age, gender, baseline strength, and selected candidate polymorphisms on maximal strength training (MST) adaptations. METHODS: A total of 49 subjects (22 men and 27 women) aged 20–76 years, divided into five age groups, completed an 8 weeks MST intervention. Each MST session consisted of 4 sets with 4 repetitions at ∼85–90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) intensity in leg-press, three times per week. 1RM was tested pre and post the intervention and blood samples were drawn to genotype candidate polymorphisms ACE I/D (rs1799752), ACTN3 R577X (rs1815739), and PPARGC1A Gly482Ser (rs8192678). RESULTS: All age groups increased leg-press 1RM (p < 0.01), with a mean improvement of 24.2 ± 14.0%. There were no differences in improvements between the five age groups or between male and female participants, and there were no non-responders. Baseline strength status did not correlate with 1RM improvements. PPARGC1A rs8192678 T allele carriers had a 15% higher age- and gender corrected baseline 1RM than the CC genotype (p < 0.05). C allele carriers improved 1RM (%) by 34.2% more than homozygotes for the T allele (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report improvement in leg-press maximal strength regardless of gender, baseline strength status in all age groups. The present study is also first to demonstrate an association between the PPARGC1A rs8192678 and maximal strength and its trainability in a moderately trained cohort. MST may be beneficial for good health and performance of all healthy individuals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7925619/ /pubmed/33679448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.636972 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kittilsen, Goleva-Fjellet, Freberg, Nicolaisen, Støa, Bratland-Sanda, Helgerud, Wang, Sæbø and Støren. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Kittilsen, Hans Torvild Goleva-Fjellet, Sannija Freberg, Baard Ingegerdsson Nicolaisen, Iver Støa, Eva Maria Bratland-Sanda, Solfrid Helgerud, Jan Wang, Eivind Sæbø, Mona Støren, Øyvind Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title | Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title_full | Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title_fullStr | Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title_short | Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups |
title_sort | responses to maximal strength training in different age and gender groups |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.636972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kittilsenhanstorvild responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT golevafjelletsannija responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT frebergbaardingegerdsson responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT nicolaiseniver responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT støaevamaria responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT bratlandsandasolfrid responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT helgerudjan responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT wangeivind responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT sæbømona responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups AT størenøyvind responsestomaximalstrengthtrainingindifferentageandgendergroups |