Cargando…
Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies
INTRODUCTION: The 2016 WHO antenatal guidelines propose evidence-based recommendations to improve maternal outcomes. We aim to complement these recommendations by describing and estimating the effects of the interventions recommended by WHO on maternal well-being or functioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042667 |
_version_ | 1783659353868337152 |
---|---|
author | Andreucci, Carla Betina Filippi, Veronique Cecatti, Jose Guilherme |
author_facet | Andreucci, Carla Betina Filippi, Veronique Cecatti, Jose Guilherme |
author_sort | Andreucci, Carla Betina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The 2016 WHO antenatal guidelines propose evidence-based recommendations to improve maternal outcomes. We aim to complement these recommendations by describing and estimating the effects of the interventions recommended by WHO on maternal well-being or functioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies evaluating women’s well-being or functioning following the implementation of evidence-based antenatal interventions, published in peer-reviewed journals through a 15-year interval (2005–2020). The lead reviewer will screen all records identified at MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, LILACS and SciELO. Two other reviewers will control screening strategy quality. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using a specially designed instrument. Data synthesis will consider the instruments applied, how often they were used, conditions/interventions for positive or negative effects documented, statistical measures used to document effectiveness and how results were presented. A random-effects meta-analysis comparing frequently used instruments may be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be a systematic review with no human beings’ involvement, therefore not requiring ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and scientific events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019143436. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7925906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79259062021-03-19 Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies Andreucci, Carla Betina Filippi, Veronique Cecatti, Jose Guilherme BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: The 2016 WHO antenatal guidelines propose evidence-based recommendations to improve maternal outcomes. We aim to complement these recommendations by describing and estimating the effects of the interventions recommended by WHO on maternal well-being or functioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies evaluating women’s well-being or functioning following the implementation of evidence-based antenatal interventions, published in peer-reviewed journals through a 15-year interval (2005–2020). The lead reviewer will screen all records identified at MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, LILACS and SciELO. Two other reviewers will control screening strategy quality. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using a specially designed instrument. Data synthesis will consider the instruments applied, how often they were used, conditions/interventions for positive or negative effects documented, statistical measures used to document effectiveness and how results were presented. A random-effects meta-analysis comparing frequently used instruments may be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be a systematic review with no human beings’ involvement, therefore not requiring ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and scientific events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019143436. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7925906/ /pubmed/33550253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042667 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Andreucci, Carla Betina Filippi, Veronique Cecatti, Jose Guilherme Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title | Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title_full | Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title_fullStr | Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title_short | Women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
title_sort | women’s well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreuccicarlabetina womenswellbeingandfunctioningafterevidencebasedantenatalcareaprotocolforasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies AT filippiveronique womenswellbeingandfunctioningafterevidencebasedantenatalcareaprotocolforasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies AT cecattijoseguilherme womenswellbeingandfunctioningafterevidencebasedantenatalcareaprotocolforasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies |