Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare is increasingly challenged to meet the demands of user involvement and knowledge mobilisation required by the 21st-century patient-centred and knowledge-based economies. Innovations are needed to reduce problematic barriers to knowledge exchange and improve collaborative pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archibald, Mandy, Wiebe, Sandra, Rieger, Kendra, Linton, Janice, Woodgate, Roberta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246
_version_ 1783659355271331840
author Archibald, Mandy
Wiebe, Sandra
Rieger, Kendra
Linton, Janice
Woodgate, Roberta
author_facet Archibald, Mandy
Wiebe, Sandra
Rieger, Kendra
Linton, Janice
Woodgate, Roberta
author_sort Archibald, Mandy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Healthcare is increasingly challenged to meet the demands of user involvement and knowledge mobilisation required by the 21st-century patient-centred and knowledge-based economies. Innovations are needed to reduce problematic barriers to knowledge exchange and improve collaborative problem solving. Living labs, as open knowledge systems, have the potential to address these gaps but are underexplored in healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct the first systematic review of living labs across healthcare contexts. We will comprehensively search the following online databases from inception to 31 December 2020: Scopus, the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Web of Science, PsycINFO (OVID) and EBSCOhost databases including Academic Search Complete, Business Source Premier, Canadian Reference Centre, CINAHL, MasterFILE Premier, SPORTDiscus, Library & Information Science Source, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, AgeLine, EconLit, Art Full Text, Women’s Studies International and Social Work Abstracts. We will search for grey literature using Google advanced techniques and books/book chapters through scholarly and bibliographical databases. We will use a dual-reviewer, two-step selection process with pre-established inclusion criteria and limit to English language publications. Empirical studies of any design examining living lab development, implementation or evaluation in health or healthcare will be included. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for methodological quality appraisal and Covidence software for review management, and we will extract data on pre-established variables such as lab context and technological platforms. We will create evidence tables and analyse across variables such as focal aim and achievement of living lab principles, such as the use of cocreation and multimethod approaches. We will tabulate data for descriptive reporting and narrative synthesis to identify current applications, approaches and promising areas for living lab development across health contexts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this review. This review will inform research into living labs in health environments, including guidance for a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation. Academic publications shared through collaborative networks and social media channels will provide substantive knowledge to the growing tech-health development sector and to researchers, practitioners and organisations seeking enhanced patient/stakeholder engagement and innovations in knowledge translation and evidence-based practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020175275
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79259122021-03-19 Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare Archibald, Mandy Wiebe, Sandra Rieger, Kendra Linton, Janice Woodgate, Roberta BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Healthcare is increasingly challenged to meet the demands of user involvement and knowledge mobilisation required by the 21st-century patient-centred and knowledge-based economies. Innovations are needed to reduce problematic barriers to knowledge exchange and improve collaborative problem solving. Living labs, as open knowledge systems, have the potential to address these gaps but are underexplored in healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct the first systematic review of living labs across healthcare contexts. We will comprehensively search the following online databases from inception to 31 December 2020: Scopus, the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Web of Science, PsycINFO (OVID) and EBSCOhost databases including Academic Search Complete, Business Source Premier, Canadian Reference Centre, CINAHL, MasterFILE Premier, SPORTDiscus, Library & Information Science Source, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, AgeLine, EconLit, Art Full Text, Women’s Studies International and Social Work Abstracts. We will search for grey literature using Google advanced techniques and books/book chapters through scholarly and bibliographical databases. We will use a dual-reviewer, two-step selection process with pre-established inclusion criteria and limit to English language publications. Empirical studies of any design examining living lab development, implementation or evaluation in health or healthcare will be included. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for methodological quality appraisal and Covidence software for review management, and we will extract data on pre-established variables such as lab context and technological platforms. We will create evidence tables and analyse across variables such as focal aim and achievement of living lab principles, such as the use of cocreation and multimethod approaches. We will tabulate data for descriptive reporting and narrative synthesis to identify current applications, approaches and promising areas for living lab development across health contexts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this review. This review will inform research into living labs in health environments, including guidance for a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation. Academic publications shared through collaborative networks and social media channels will provide substantive knowledge to the growing tech-health development sector and to researchers, practitioners and organisations seeking enhanced patient/stakeholder engagement and innovations in knowledge translation and evidence-based practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020175275 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7925912/ /pubmed/33550226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Archibald, Mandy
Wiebe, Sandra
Rieger, Kendra
Linton, Janice
Woodgate, Roberta
Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title_full Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title_short Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
title_sort protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246
work_keys_str_mv AT archibaldmandy protocolforasystematicreviewoflivinglabsinhealthcare
AT wiebesandra protocolforasystematicreviewoflivinglabsinhealthcare
AT riegerkendra protocolforasystematicreviewoflivinglabsinhealthcare
AT lintonjanice protocolforasystematicreviewoflivinglabsinhealthcare
AT woodgateroberta protocolforasystematicreviewoflivinglabsinhealthcare