Cargando…

Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS

OBJECTIVE: Automated systems are needed for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of Pseudomonas-associated nosocomial infections among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. We assessed the performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of P. aeruginosa using VITEK®-MS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moehario, Lucky Hartati, Tjoa, Enty, Putranata, Hans, Joon, Shikha, Edbert, Daniel, Robertus, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060521989893
_version_ 1783659362845196288
author Moehario, Lucky Hartati
Tjoa, Enty
Putranata, Hans
Joon, Shikha
Edbert, Daniel
Robertus, Thomas
author_facet Moehario, Lucky Hartati
Tjoa, Enty
Putranata, Hans
Joon, Shikha
Edbert, Daniel
Robertus, Thomas
author_sort Moehario, Lucky Hartati
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Automated systems are needed for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of Pseudomonas-associated nosocomial infections among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. We assessed the performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of P. aeruginosa using VITEK®-MS as the gold standard. METHODS: This analytical study employed a cross-sectional approach. First, 44 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were collected and refreshed. Next, a single colony of oxidase-positive, gram-negative rods (30 samples) was inoculated into a TDR-300B NF-64 card and VITEK®2 GN cassette for each isolate. Finally, bacterial identification was performed using VITEK®-MS for comparative analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the results for VITEK®-MS, the congruence rates for TDR-300B and VITEK®2 were 80.76% (21/26) and 92.30% (24/26), respectively. Further, high sensitivity was observed for TDR-300B and VITEK®2 (95.45% and 100%, respectively). In addition, TDR-300B had a lower positive predictive value and accuracy than VITEK®2, albeit without significance. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, there were no significant differences regarding the diagnostic efficiency of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for P. aeruginosa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7925945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79259452021-03-11 Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS Moehario, Lucky Hartati Tjoa, Enty Putranata, Hans Joon, Shikha Edbert, Daniel Robertus, Thomas J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Automated systems are needed for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of Pseudomonas-associated nosocomial infections among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. We assessed the performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of P. aeruginosa using VITEK®-MS as the gold standard. METHODS: This analytical study employed a cross-sectional approach. First, 44 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were collected and refreshed. Next, a single colony of oxidase-positive, gram-negative rods (30 samples) was inoculated into a TDR-300B NF-64 card and VITEK®2 GN cassette for each isolate. Finally, bacterial identification was performed using VITEK®-MS for comparative analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the results for VITEK®-MS, the congruence rates for TDR-300B and VITEK®2 were 80.76% (21/26) and 92.30% (24/26), respectively. Further, high sensitivity was observed for TDR-300B and VITEK®2 (95.45% and 100%, respectively). In addition, TDR-300B had a lower positive predictive value and accuracy than VITEK®2, albeit without significance. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, there were no significant differences regarding the diagnostic efficiency of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for P. aeruginosa. SAGE Publications 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7925945/ /pubmed/33626939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060521989893 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Prospective Clinical Research Report
Moehario, Lucky Hartati
Tjoa, Enty
Putranata, Hans
Joon, Shikha
Edbert, Daniel
Robertus, Thomas
Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title_full Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title_fullStr Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title_full_unstemmed Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title_short Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS
title_sort performance of tdr-300b and vitek®2 for the identification of pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with vitek®-ms
topic Prospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060521989893
work_keys_str_mv AT moeharioluckyhartati performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms
AT tjoaenty performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms
AT putranatahans performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms
AT joonshikha performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms
AT edbertdaniel performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms
AT robertusthomas performanceoftdr300bandvitek2fortheidentificationofpseudomonasaeruginosaincomparisonwithvitekms