Cargando…

Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay

BACKGROUND: Drivers behind the adoption of gene expression profiling in breast cancer oncology have been shown to include exposure to physician colleagues’ use of a given genomic test. We examined adoption of the Oncotype DX 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay (ODX) in the United States aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zipkin, Ronnie, Schaefer, Andrew, Chamberlin, Mary, Onega, Tracy, O'Malley, Alistair J., Moen, Erika L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7926024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33455068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3720
_version_ 1783659380495876096
author Zipkin, Ronnie
Schaefer, Andrew
Chamberlin, Mary
Onega, Tracy
O'Malley, Alistair J.
Moen, Erika L.
author_facet Zipkin, Ronnie
Schaefer, Andrew
Chamberlin, Mary
Onega, Tracy
O'Malley, Alistair J.
Moen, Erika L.
author_sort Zipkin, Ronnie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drivers behind the adoption of gene expression profiling in breast cancer oncology have been shown to include exposure to physician colleagues’ use of a given genomic test. We examined adoption of the Oncotype DX 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay (ODX) in the United States after its incorporation into clinical guidelines. The influence of patient‐sharing ties and co‐location with prior adopters and the role of these potential exposures across medical specialties on peers’ adoption of the test were examined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with incident breast cancer using a 100% sample of fee‐for‐service Medicare enrollee claims over 2008–2011. Peer networks connecting medical oncologists and surgeons treating these patients were constructed using patient‐sharing and geographic co‐location. The impact of peer connections on the adoption of ODX by physicians and testing of patients was modeled with multivariable hierarchical regression. RESULTS: Altogether, 156,229 women identified with incident breast cancer met criteria for cohort inclusion. A total of 7689 ODX prescribing physicians were identified. Co‐location with medical oncologists who adopted the test in the early period (2008–2009) was associated with a 1.38‐fold increase in the odds of a medical oncologist adopting ODX in 2010–2011 (95% CI = 1.04–1.83), as was co‐location with early‐adopting surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00–1.58). Patients whose primary medical oncologist was linked to an early‐adopting surgeon through co‐location (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04–1.32) or both patient‐sharing and co‐location (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03–1.34) were more likely to receive ODX. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to surgeon early adopters through peer networks and co‐location was predictive of ODX uptake by medical oncologists and testing of patients. Interventions focused on the role of surgeons in molecular testing may improve the implementation of best practices in breast cancer care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7926024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79260242021-03-12 Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay Zipkin, Ronnie Schaefer, Andrew Chamberlin, Mary Onega, Tracy O'Malley, Alistair J. Moen, Erika L. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Drivers behind the adoption of gene expression profiling in breast cancer oncology have been shown to include exposure to physician colleagues’ use of a given genomic test. We examined adoption of the Oncotype DX 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay (ODX) in the United States after its incorporation into clinical guidelines. The influence of patient‐sharing ties and co‐location with prior adopters and the role of these potential exposures across medical specialties on peers’ adoption of the test were examined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with incident breast cancer using a 100% sample of fee‐for‐service Medicare enrollee claims over 2008–2011. Peer networks connecting medical oncologists and surgeons treating these patients were constructed using patient‐sharing and geographic co‐location. The impact of peer connections on the adoption of ODX by physicians and testing of patients was modeled with multivariable hierarchical regression. RESULTS: Altogether, 156,229 women identified with incident breast cancer met criteria for cohort inclusion. A total of 7689 ODX prescribing physicians were identified. Co‐location with medical oncologists who adopted the test in the early period (2008–2009) was associated with a 1.38‐fold increase in the odds of a medical oncologist adopting ODX in 2010–2011 (95% CI = 1.04–1.83), as was co‐location with early‐adopting surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00–1.58). Patients whose primary medical oncologist was linked to an early‐adopting surgeon through co‐location (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04–1.32) or both patient‐sharing and co‐location (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03–1.34) were more likely to receive ODX. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to surgeon early adopters through peer networks and co‐location was predictive of ODX uptake by medical oncologists and testing of patients. Interventions focused on the role of surgeons in molecular testing may improve the implementation of best practices in breast cancer care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7926024/ /pubmed/33455068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3720 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Zipkin, Ronnie
Schaefer, Andrew
Chamberlin, Mary
Onega, Tracy
O'Malley, Alistair J.
Moen, Erika L.
Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title_full Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title_fullStr Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title_full_unstemmed Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title_short Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
title_sort surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21‐gene breast cancer recurrence score assay
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7926024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33455068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3720
work_keys_str_mv AT zipkinronnie surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay
AT schaeferandrew surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay
AT chamberlinmary surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay
AT onegatracy surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay
AT omalleyalistairj surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay
AT moenerikal surgeonandmedicaloncologistpeernetworkeffectsontheuptakeofthe21genebreastcancerrecurrencescoreassay