Cargando…

A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications

Objective: To provide a human–Artificial Intelligence (AI) interaction review for Machine Learning (ML) applications to inform how to best combine both human domain expertise and computational power of ML methods. The review focuses on the medical field, as the medical ML application literature high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maadi, Mansoureh, Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Hadi, Aickelin, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7926732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042121
_version_ 1783659529386328064
author Maadi, Mansoureh
Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Hadi
Aickelin, Uwe
author_facet Maadi, Mansoureh
Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Hadi
Aickelin, Uwe
author_sort Maadi, Mansoureh
collection PubMed
description Objective: To provide a human–Artificial Intelligence (AI) interaction review for Machine Learning (ML) applications to inform how to best combine both human domain expertise and computational power of ML methods. The review focuses on the medical field, as the medical ML application literature highlights a special necessity of medical experts collaborating with ML approaches. Methods: A scoping literature review is performed on Scopus and Google Scholar using the terms “human in the loop”, “human in the loop machine learning”, and “interactive machine learning”. Peer-reviewed papers published from 2015 to 2020 are included in our review. Results: We design four questions to investigate and describe human–AI interaction in ML applications. These questions are “Why should humans be in the loop?”, “Where does human–AI interaction occur in the ML processes?”, “Who are the humans in the loop?”, and “How do humans interact with ML in Human-In-the-Loop ML (HILML)?”. To answer the first question, we describe three main reasons regarding the importance of human involvement in ML applications. To address the second question, human–AI interaction is investigated in three main algorithmic stages: 1. data producing and pre-processing; 2. ML modelling; and 3. ML evaluation and refinement. The importance of the expertise level of the humans in human–AI interaction is described to answer the third question. The number of human interactions in HILML is grouped into three categories to address the fourth question. We conclude the paper by offering a discussion on open opportunities for future research in HILML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7926732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79267322021-03-04 A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications Maadi, Mansoureh Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Hadi Aickelin, Uwe Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Objective: To provide a human–Artificial Intelligence (AI) interaction review for Machine Learning (ML) applications to inform how to best combine both human domain expertise and computational power of ML methods. The review focuses on the medical field, as the medical ML application literature highlights a special necessity of medical experts collaborating with ML approaches. Methods: A scoping literature review is performed on Scopus and Google Scholar using the terms “human in the loop”, “human in the loop machine learning”, and “interactive machine learning”. Peer-reviewed papers published from 2015 to 2020 are included in our review. Results: We design four questions to investigate and describe human–AI interaction in ML applications. These questions are “Why should humans be in the loop?”, “Where does human–AI interaction occur in the ML processes?”, “Who are the humans in the loop?”, and “How do humans interact with ML in Human-In-the-Loop ML (HILML)?”. To answer the first question, we describe three main reasons regarding the importance of human involvement in ML applications. To address the second question, human–AI interaction is investigated in three main algorithmic stages: 1. data producing and pre-processing; 2. ML modelling; and 3. ML evaluation and refinement. The importance of the expertise level of the humans in human–AI interaction is described to answer the third question. The number of human interactions in HILML is grouped into three categories to address the fourth question. We conclude the paper by offering a discussion on open opportunities for future research in HILML. MDPI 2021-02-22 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7926732/ /pubmed/33671609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042121 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Maadi, Mansoureh
Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Hadi
Aickelin, Uwe
A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title_full A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title_fullStr A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title_short A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications
title_sort review on human–ai interaction in machine learning and insights for medical applications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7926732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042121
work_keys_str_mv AT maadimansoureh areviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications
AT akbarzadehkhorshidihadi areviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications
AT aickelinuwe areviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications
AT maadimansoureh reviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications
AT akbarzadehkhorshidihadi reviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications
AT aickelinuwe reviewonhumanaiinteractioninmachinelearningandinsightsformedicalapplications