Cargando…
The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept?
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The trade in birds for pet trade is harming wild bird populations and bird welfare. Inadequate housing of many pet birds results in stereotypies and other indicators of poor welfare in the birds that are currently widespread. Some pet birds were taken from the wild or bred in poor co...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020582 |
_version_ | 1783659592709832704 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Shawn Broom, Donald M. |
author_facet | Peng, Shawn Broom, Donald M. |
author_sort | Peng, Shawn |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The trade in birds for pet trade is harming wild bird populations and bird welfare. Inadequate housing of many pet birds results in stereotypies and other indicators of poor welfare in the birds that are currently widespread. Some pet birds were taken from the wild or bred in poor conditions, while others had nutritional, health, and behavioral problems resulting from inadequate living conditions and incorrect husbandry by the bird owners. As a consequence, it is not ethically right to keep the majority of the birds that are at present kept as pets. If birds are to be continued as a companion animal for people, then more effort should be made by pet shop owners and veterinarians to supply literature to prospective owners highlighting not only the proper care for the species of bird but also its needs and requirements, so that bird owners can do their utmost to meet them. Owners do not comply with laws requiring duty of care, unless they obtain and act on such information and also have knowledge of how to provide good nutrition and minimize the risk of disease. New laws are needed to prohibit taking birds from the wild and keeping birds in conditions that do not meet their needs. ABSTRACT: We describe a wide range of unethical and unsustainable practices inherent to the trading and keeping of pet birds. At present, biodiversity and wild bird populations are being greatly harmed and many individual birds have poor welfare. Wild-caught birds should not be sold to the public as pets, or to breeding establishments for several reasons, including because 75–90% of wild-caught birds die before the point of sale and taking birds from the wild has negative effects on biodiversity. The housing provided for pet birds should meet the needs of birds of that species and allow good welfare, for example there should be no small cages but aviaries with space for each bird to exercise adequately, and social birds should be kept in social groups. At present, inadequate housing of many pet birds results in stereotypies and other indicators of poor welfare in birds. Owners should have knowledge of how to provide good nutrition and minimize the risk of disease. Unless these changes are made, keeping birds as pets should not be permitted. New laws are needed to prohibit taking birds from the wild and ensure captive pet birds in conditions that do meet their needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7927005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79270052021-03-04 The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? Peng, Shawn Broom, Donald M. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The trade in birds for pet trade is harming wild bird populations and bird welfare. Inadequate housing of many pet birds results in stereotypies and other indicators of poor welfare in the birds that are currently widespread. Some pet birds were taken from the wild or bred in poor conditions, while others had nutritional, health, and behavioral problems resulting from inadequate living conditions and incorrect husbandry by the bird owners. As a consequence, it is not ethically right to keep the majority of the birds that are at present kept as pets. If birds are to be continued as a companion animal for people, then more effort should be made by pet shop owners and veterinarians to supply literature to prospective owners highlighting not only the proper care for the species of bird but also its needs and requirements, so that bird owners can do their utmost to meet them. Owners do not comply with laws requiring duty of care, unless they obtain and act on such information and also have knowledge of how to provide good nutrition and minimize the risk of disease. New laws are needed to prohibit taking birds from the wild and keeping birds in conditions that do not meet their needs. ABSTRACT: We describe a wide range of unethical and unsustainable practices inherent to the trading and keeping of pet birds. At present, biodiversity and wild bird populations are being greatly harmed and many individual birds have poor welfare. Wild-caught birds should not be sold to the public as pets, or to breeding establishments for several reasons, including because 75–90% of wild-caught birds die before the point of sale and taking birds from the wild has negative effects on biodiversity. The housing provided for pet birds should meet the needs of birds of that species and allow good welfare, for example there should be no small cages but aviaries with space for each bird to exercise adequately, and social birds should be kept in social groups. At present, inadequate housing of many pet birds results in stereotypies and other indicators of poor welfare in birds. Owners should have knowledge of how to provide good nutrition and minimize the risk of disease. Unless these changes are made, keeping birds as pets should not be permitted. New laws are needed to prohibit taking birds from the wild and ensure captive pet birds in conditions that do meet their needs. MDPI 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7927005/ /pubmed/33672378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020582 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Peng, Shawn Broom, Donald M. The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title | The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title_full | The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title_fullStr | The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title_short | The Sustainability of Keeping Birds as Pets: Should Any Be Kept? |
title_sort | sustainability of keeping birds as pets: should any be kept? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengshawn thesustainabilityofkeepingbirdsaspetsshouldanybekept AT broomdonaldm thesustainabilityofkeepingbirdsaspetsshouldanybekept AT pengshawn sustainabilityofkeepingbirdsaspetsshouldanybekept AT broomdonaldm sustainabilityofkeepingbirdsaspetsshouldanybekept |