Cargando…
Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces
Current gold-standard strategies for bone regeneration do not achieve the optimal recovery of bone biomechanical properties. To bypass these limitations, tissue engineering techniques based on hybrid materials made up of osteoprogenitor cells—such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)—and bioactive ceram...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020481 |
_version_ | 1783659607337467904 |
---|---|
author | Mucientes, Arkaitz Herranz, Eva Moro, Enrique González-Corchón, Aranzazu Peña-Soria, María Jesús Abasolo, Lydia Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Luis Lamas, Jose Ramon Fernández-Gutiérrez, Benjamín |
author_facet | Mucientes, Arkaitz Herranz, Eva Moro, Enrique González-Corchón, Aranzazu Peña-Soria, María Jesús Abasolo, Lydia Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Luis Lamas, Jose Ramon Fernández-Gutiérrez, Benjamín |
author_sort | Mucientes, Arkaitz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current gold-standard strategies for bone regeneration do not achieve the optimal recovery of bone biomechanical properties. To bypass these limitations, tissue engineering techniques based on hybrid materials made up of osteoprogenitor cells—such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)—and bioactive ceramic scaffolds—such as calcium phosphate-based (CaPs) bioceramics—seem promising. The biological properties of MSCs are influenced by the tissue source. This study aims to define the optimal MSC source and construct (i.e., the MSC–CaP combination) for clinical application in bone regeneration. A previous iTRAQ analysis generated the hypothesis that anatomical proximity to bone has a direct effect on MSC phenotype. MSCs were isolated from adipose tissue, bone marrow, and dental pulp, then cultured both on a plastic surface and on CaPs (hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate), to compare their biological features. On plastic, MSCs isolated from dental pulp (DPSCs) presented the highest proliferation capacity and the greatest osteogenic potential. On both CaPs, DPSCs demonstrated the greatest capacity to colonise the bioceramics. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a trend that DPSCs had the most robust increase in ALP activity. Regarding CaPs, β-tricalcium phosphate obtained the best viability results, while hydroxyapatite had the highest ALP activity values. Therefore, we propose DPSCs as suitable MSCs for cell-based bone regeneration strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7927066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79270662021-03-04 Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces Mucientes, Arkaitz Herranz, Eva Moro, Enrique González-Corchón, Aranzazu Peña-Soria, María Jesús Abasolo, Lydia Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Luis Lamas, Jose Ramon Fernández-Gutiérrez, Benjamín Cells Article Current gold-standard strategies for bone regeneration do not achieve the optimal recovery of bone biomechanical properties. To bypass these limitations, tissue engineering techniques based on hybrid materials made up of osteoprogenitor cells—such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)—and bioactive ceramic scaffolds—such as calcium phosphate-based (CaPs) bioceramics—seem promising. The biological properties of MSCs are influenced by the tissue source. This study aims to define the optimal MSC source and construct (i.e., the MSC–CaP combination) for clinical application in bone regeneration. A previous iTRAQ analysis generated the hypothesis that anatomical proximity to bone has a direct effect on MSC phenotype. MSCs were isolated from adipose tissue, bone marrow, and dental pulp, then cultured both on a plastic surface and on CaPs (hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate), to compare their biological features. On plastic, MSCs isolated from dental pulp (DPSCs) presented the highest proliferation capacity and the greatest osteogenic potential. On both CaPs, DPSCs demonstrated the greatest capacity to colonise the bioceramics. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a trend that DPSCs had the most robust increase in ALP activity. Regarding CaPs, β-tricalcium phosphate obtained the best viability results, while hydroxyapatite had the highest ALP activity values. Therefore, we propose DPSCs as suitable MSCs for cell-based bone regeneration strategies. MDPI 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7927066/ /pubmed/33672328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020481 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mucientes, Arkaitz Herranz, Eva Moro, Enrique González-Corchón, Aranzazu Peña-Soria, María Jesús Abasolo, Lydia Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Luis Lamas, Jose Ramon Fernández-Gutiérrez, Benjamín Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title | Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title_full | Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title_fullStr | Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title_short | Influence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sources on Their Regenerative Capacities on Different Surfaces |
title_sort | influence of mesenchymal stem cell sources on their regenerative capacities on different surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mucientesarkaitz influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT herranzeva influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT moroenrique influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT gonzalezcorchonaranzazu influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT penasoriamariajesus influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT abasololydia influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT rodriguezrodriguezluis influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT lamasjoseramon influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces AT fernandezgutierrezbenjamin influenceofmesenchymalstemcellsourcesontheirregenerativecapacitiesondifferentsurfaces |