Cargando…
Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study
BACKGROUND: This study introduced machine learning approaches to predict newborn’s body mass index (BMI) based on ultrasound measures and maternal/delivery information. METHODS: Data came from 3159 obstetric patients and their newborns enrolled in a multi-center retrospective study. Variable importa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5 |
_version_ | 1783659634389680128 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kwang-Sig Kim, Ho Yeon Lee, Se Jin Kwon, Sung Ok Na, Sunghun Hwang, Han Sung Park, Mi Hye Ahn, Ki Hoon |
author_facet | Lee, Kwang-Sig Kim, Ho Yeon Lee, Se Jin Kwon, Sung Ok Na, Sunghun Hwang, Han Sung Park, Mi Hye Ahn, Ki Hoon |
author_sort | Lee, Kwang-Sig |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study introduced machine learning approaches to predict newborn’s body mass index (BMI) based on ultrasound measures and maternal/delivery information. METHODS: Data came from 3159 obstetric patients and their newborns enrolled in a multi-center retrospective study. Variable importance, the effect of a variable on model performance, was used for identifying major predictors of newborn’s BMI among ultrasound measures and maternal/delivery information. The ultrasound measures included biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) taken three times during the week 21 - week 35 of gestational age and once in the week 36 or later. RESULTS: Based on variable importance from the random forest, major predictors of newborn’s BMI were the first AC and EFW in the week 36 or later, gestational age at delivery, the first AC during the week 21 - the week 35, maternal BMI at delivery, maternal weight at delivery and the first BPD in the week 36 or later. For predicting newborn’s BMI, linear regression (2.0744) and the random forest (2.1610) were better than artificial neural networks with one, two and three hidden layers (150.7100, 154.7198 and 152.5843, respectively) in the mean squared error. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first machine-learning study with 64 clinical and sonographic markers for the prediction of newborns’ BMI. The week 36 or later is the most effective period for taking the ultrasound measures and AC and EFW are the best predictors of newborn’s BMI alongside gestational age at delivery and maternal BMI at delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7927215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79272152021-03-03 Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study Lee, Kwang-Sig Kim, Ho Yeon Lee, Se Jin Kwon, Sung Ok Na, Sunghun Hwang, Han Sung Park, Mi Hye Ahn, Ki Hoon BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: This study introduced machine learning approaches to predict newborn’s body mass index (BMI) based on ultrasound measures and maternal/delivery information. METHODS: Data came from 3159 obstetric patients and their newborns enrolled in a multi-center retrospective study. Variable importance, the effect of a variable on model performance, was used for identifying major predictors of newborn’s BMI among ultrasound measures and maternal/delivery information. The ultrasound measures included biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) taken three times during the week 21 - week 35 of gestational age and once in the week 36 or later. RESULTS: Based on variable importance from the random forest, major predictors of newborn’s BMI were the first AC and EFW in the week 36 or later, gestational age at delivery, the first AC during the week 21 - the week 35, maternal BMI at delivery, maternal weight at delivery and the first BPD in the week 36 or later. For predicting newborn’s BMI, linear regression (2.0744) and the random forest (2.1610) were better than artificial neural networks with one, two and three hidden layers (150.7100, 154.7198 and 152.5843, respectively) in the mean squared error. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first machine-learning study with 64 clinical and sonographic markers for the prediction of newborns’ BMI. The week 36 or later is the most effective period for taking the ultrasound measures and AC and EFW are the best predictors of newborn’s BMI alongside gestational age at delivery and maternal BMI at delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5. BioMed Central 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7927215/ /pubmed/33653299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Kwang-Sig Kim, Ho Yeon Lee, Se Jin Kwon, Sung Ok Na, Sunghun Hwang, Han Sung Park, Mi Hye Ahn, Ki Hoon Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title | Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title_full | Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title_fullStr | Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title_short | Prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
title_sort | prediction of newborn’s body mass index using nationwide multicenter ultrasound data: a machine-learning study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03660-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekwangsig predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT kimhoyeon predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT leesejin predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT kwonsungok predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT nasunghun predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT hwanghansung predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT parkmihye predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT ahnkihoon predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy AT predictionofnewbornsbodymassindexusingnationwidemulticenterultrasounddataamachinelearningstudy |