Cargando…

Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a primary headache disorder that can be classified into an episodic (EM) and a chronic form (CM). Network analysis within the graph-theoretical framework based on connectivity patterns provides an approach to observe large-scale structural integrity. We test the hypothesis th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michels, Lars, Koirala, Nabin, Groppa, Sergiu, Luechinger, Roger, Gantenbein, Andreas R., Sandor, Peter S., Kollias, Spyros, Riederer, Franz, Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33657996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8
_version_ 1783659637781823488
author Michels, Lars
Koirala, Nabin
Groppa, Sergiu
Luechinger, Roger
Gantenbein, Andreas R.
Sandor, Peter S.
Kollias, Spyros
Riederer, Franz
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
author_facet Michels, Lars
Koirala, Nabin
Groppa, Sergiu
Luechinger, Roger
Gantenbein, Andreas R.
Sandor, Peter S.
Kollias, Spyros
Riederer, Franz
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
author_sort Michels, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Migraine is a primary headache disorder that can be classified into an episodic (EM) and a chronic form (CM). Network analysis within the graph-theoretical framework based on connectivity patterns provides an approach to observe large-scale structural integrity. We test the hypothesis that migraineurs are characterized by a segregated network. METHODS: 19 healthy controls (HC), 17 EM patients and 12 CM patients were included. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were computed, and topology was analyzed using a graph theory analytical framework and network-based statistics. We further used support vector machines regression (SVR) to identify whether these network measures were able to predict clinical parameters. RESULTS: Network based statistics revealed significantly lower interregional connectivity strength between anatomical compartments including the fronto-temporal, parietal and visual areas in EM and CM when compared to HC. Higher assortativity was seen in both patients’ group, with higher modularity for CM and higher transitivity for EM compared to HC. For subcortical networks, higher assortativity and transitivity were observed for both patients’ group with higher modularity for CM. SVR revealed that network measures could robustly predict clinical parameters for migraineurs. CONCLUSION: We found global network disruption for EM and CM indicated by highly segregated network in migraine patients compared to HC. Higher modularity but lower clustering coefficient in CM is suggestive of more segregation in this group compared to EM. The presence of a segregated network could be a sign of maladaptive reorganization of headache related brain circuits, leading to migraine attacks or secondary alterations to pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7927231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79272312021-03-03 Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine Michels, Lars Koirala, Nabin Groppa, Sergiu Luechinger, Roger Gantenbein, Andreas R. Sandor, Peter S. Kollias, Spyros Riederer, Franz Muthuraman, Muthuraman J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Migraine is a primary headache disorder that can be classified into an episodic (EM) and a chronic form (CM). Network analysis within the graph-theoretical framework based on connectivity patterns provides an approach to observe large-scale structural integrity. We test the hypothesis that migraineurs are characterized by a segregated network. METHODS: 19 healthy controls (HC), 17 EM patients and 12 CM patients were included. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were computed, and topology was analyzed using a graph theory analytical framework and network-based statistics. We further used support vector machines regression (SVR) to identify whether these network measures were able to predict clinical parameters. RESULTS: Network based statistics revealed significantly lower interregional connectivity strength between anatomical compartments including the fronto-temporal, parietal and visual areas in EM and CM when compared to HC. Higher assortativity was seen in both patients’ group, with higher modularity for CM and higher transitivity for EM compared to HC. For subcortical networks, higher assortativity and transitivity were observed for both patients’ group with higher modularity for CM. SVR revealed that network measures could robustly predict clinical parameters for migraineurs. CONCLUSION: We found global network disruption for EM and CM indicated by highly segregated network in migraine patients compared to HC. Higher modularity but lower clustering coefficient in CM is suggestive of more segregation in this group compared to EM. The presence of a segregated network could be a sign of maladaptive reorganization of headache related brain circuits, leading to migraine attacks or secondary alterations to pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8. Springer Milan 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7927231/ /pubmed/33657996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michels, Lars
Koirala, Nabin
Groppa, Sergiu
Luechinger, Roger
Gantenbein, Andreas R.
Sandor, Peter S.
Kollias, Spyros
Riederer, Franz
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title_full Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title_fullStr Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title_full_unstemmed Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title_short Structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
title_sort structural brain network characteristics in patients with episodic and chronic migraine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33657996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01216-8
work_keys_str_mv AT michelslars structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT koiralanabin structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT groppasergiu structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT luechingerroger structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT gantenbeinandreasr structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT sandorpeters structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT kolliasspyros structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT riedererfranz structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine
AT muthuramanmuthuraman structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicsinpatientswithepisodicandchronicmigraine