Cargando…

Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of HIV status remains a challenge despite implementation of various testing strategies including provider-initiated HIV testing (PITC). Harare City intensified provider-initiated HIV testing by targeting testing all eligible clients visiting facilities to achieve the UNAIDS fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandere, Edias, Mungati, More, Gonese, Gloria, Gombe, Notion, Juru, Tsitsi, Chiwanda, Simbarashe, Govha, Emmanuel, Shambira, Gerald, Tshimanga, Mufuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10485-6
_version_ 1783659639702814720
author Mandere, Edias
Mungati, More
Gonese, Gloria
Gombe, Notion
Juru, Tsitsi
Chiwanda, Simbarashe
Govha, Emmanuel
Shambira, Gerald
Tshimanga, Mufuta
author_facet Mandere, Edias
Mungati, More
Gonese, Gloria
Gombe, Notion
Juru, Tsitsi
Chiwanda, Simbarashe
Govha, Emmanuel
Shambira, Gerald
Tshimanga, Mufuta
author_sort Mandere, Edias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge of HIV status remains a challenge despite implementation of various testing strategies including provider-initiated HIV testing (PITC). Harare City intensified provider-initiated HIV testing by targeting testing all eligible clients visiting facilities to achieve the UNAIDS first 95. This study aimed at evaluating the intervention to improve its effectiveness and inform programming decisions for universal access to HIV testing. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Harare from April to June 2019. Evaluation of the intervention was conducted using the logic model approach to assess the inputs, processes and outputs. Health workers were interviewed using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Exit interviews were conducted for eligible clients > 18 years who refused to be tested. A checklist was used to assess the inputs used and a desk review of HIV screening and testing records was done. RESULTS: A total of (n-45) health care workers and (n = 70) clients were interviewed with a response rate of (92%) and (84%) respectively. The median age for clients was 31(Q1 = 24: Q3 = 38) and median years in service for health workers was 2 (Q(1) = 1;Q(3) = 26). Of the 133,899 clients who were eligible for testing after screening, 98,587 (74%) accepted the test leaving a gap of 35,312 (26%). However, 21/45 (47%) of health workers indicated high workload in the morning as the major reason for the leakage. In addition, 25/70 (36%) of the clients indicated long waiting time as the reason for opting out of HIV testing. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: HIV testing coverage for eligible clients was not optimal, 26% opted out. We recommend strengthening of health facility systems such as review of patient flow, re-allocation of staff during busy HIV testing time and scaling up the use of HIV self-test kits for clients concerned with waiting time to improve HIV testing coverage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10485-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7927239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79272392021-03-03 Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018 Mandere, Edias Mungati, More Gonese, Gloria Gombe, Notion Juru, Tsitsi Chiwanda, Simbarashe Govha, Emmanuel Shambira, Gerald Tshimanga, Mufuta BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge of HIV status remains a challenge despite implementation of various testing strategies including provider-initiated HIV testing (PITC). Harare City intensified provider-initiated HIV testing by targeting testing all eligible clients visiting facilities to achieve the UNAIDS first 95. This study aimed at evaluating the intervention to improve its effectiveness and inform programming decisions for universal access to HIV testing. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Harare from April to June 2019. Evaluation of the intervention was conducted using the logic model approach to assess the inputs, processes and outputs. Health workers were interviewed using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Exit interviews were conducted for eligible clients > 18 years who refused to be tested. A checklist was used to assess the inputs used and a desk review of HIV screening and testing records was done. RESULTS: A total of (n-45) health care workers and (n = 70) clients were interviewed with a response rate of (92%) and (84%) respectively. The median age for clients was 31(Q1 = 24: Q3 = 38) and median years in service for health workers was 2 (Q(1) = 1;Q(3) = 26). Of the 133,899 clients who were eligible for testing after screening, 98,587 (74%) accepted the test leaving a gap of 35,312 (26%). However, 21/45 (47%) of health workers indicated high workload in the morning as the major reason for the leakage. In addition, 25/70 (36%) of the clients indicated long waiting time as the reason for opting out of HIV testing. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: HIV testing coverage for eligible clients was not optimal, 26% opted out. We recommend strengthening of health facility systems such as review of patient flow, re-allocation of staff during busy HIV testing time and scaling up the use of HIV self-test kits for clients concerned with waiting time to improve HIV testing coverage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10485-6. BioMed Central 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7927239/ /pubmed/33653303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10485-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mandere, Edias
Mungati, More
Gonese, Gloria
Gombe, Notion
Juru, Tsitsi
Chiwanda, Simbarashe
Govha, Emmanuel
Shambira, Gerald
Tshimanga, Mufuta
Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title_full Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title_fullStr Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title_short Evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in Harare City, 2017–2018
title_sort evaluation of intensified provider initiated testing and counselling program in harare city, 2017–2018
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33653303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10485-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mandereedias evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT mungatimore evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT gonesegloria evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT gombenotion evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT jurutsitsi evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT chiwandasimbarashe evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT govhaemmanuel evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT shambiragerald evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018
AT tshimangamufuta evaluationofintensifiedproviderinitiatedtestingandcounsellingprograminhararecity20172018