Cargando…

Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events

OBJECTIVE: Lenalidomide is an effective immunomodulatory derivative drug used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). It is available in original and generic forms in Turkey, but there is no clinical study that has compared the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of the generic and original fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolaman, Ali Zahit, Turgutkaya, Atakan, Sahip, Birsen, Selim, Cem, Eroğlu Küçükdiler, Hilal, Ertop, Şehmus, Sargın, Gökhan, Yavaşoğlu, İrfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342205
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2020.2020.0169
_version_ 1783659667481690112
author Bolaman, Ali Zahit
Turgutkaya, Atakan
Sahip, Birsen
Selim, Cem
Eroğlu Küçükdiler, Hilal
Ertop, Şehmus
Sargın, Gökhan
Yavaşoğlu, İrfan
author_facet Bolaman, Ali Zahit
Turgutkaya, Atakan
Sahip, Birsen
Selim, Cem
Eroğlu Küçükdiler, Hilal
Ertop, Şehmus
Sargın, Gökhan
Yavaşoğlu, İrfan
author_sort Bolaman, Ali Zahit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Lenalidomide is an effective immunomodulatory derivative drug used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). It is available in original and generic forms in Turkey, but there is no clinical study that has compared the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of the generic and original forms of lenalidomide. We compared the effectivity and AEs of generic and original lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with RRMM using original or generic lenalidomide were evaluated retrospectively. Overall response (OR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease rates and hematologic and nonhematologic AEs were evaluated in these RRMM patients. The results were described as numbers, frequencies, and percentages and were analyzed using PASW 19.0 for Windows with chi-square and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The number of patients using original lenalidomide was 55 and the number of patients using generic lenalidomide was 43. The OR rate was 67.2% for patients using original lenalidomide and 60.4% for those on generic lenalidomide. CR and VGPR rates were 14.5% and 45.4% in the original group while the CR and VGPR rates were 20.9% and 18.6%, respectively, in patients using generic lenalidomide. Hematologic AEs were similar in the two groups while some nonhematologic AEs were less common in the original lenalidomide group than the generic group. Only pyrexia as a grade 3-4 AE was more common in the original lenalidomide than the generic lenalidomide group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the generic form of lenalidomide has similar efficacy with the original form of lenalidomide in the treatment of RRMM. The AEs of original lenalidomide were generally fewer than those of generic lenalidomide. Further studies involving a larger number of patients with RRMM would be useful for comparing the efficacy and AEs of original and generic lenalidomide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7927438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79274382021-03-11 Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events Bolaman, Ali Zahit Turgutkaya, Atakan Sahip, Birsen Selim, Cem Eroğlu Küçükdiler, Hilal Ertop, Şehmus Sargın, Gökhan Yavaşoğlu, İrfan Turk J Haematol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Lenalidomide is an effective immunomodulatory derivative drug used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). It is available in original and generic forms in Turkey, but there is no clinical study that has compared the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of the generic and original forms of lenalidomide. We compared the effectivity and AEs of generic and original lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with RRMM using original or generic lenalidomide were evaluated retrospectively. Overall response (OR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease rates and hematologic and nonhematologic AEs were evaluated in these RRMM patients. The results were described as numbers, frequencies, and percentages and were analyzed using PASW 19.0 for Windows with chi-square and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The number of patients using original lenalidomide was 55 and the number of patients using generic lenalidomide was 43. The OR rate was 67.2% for patients using original lenalidomide and 60.4% for those on generic lenalidomide. CR and VGPR rates were 14.5% and 45.4% in the original group while the CR and VGPR rates were 20.9% and 18.6%, respectively, in patients using generic lenalidomide. Hematologic AEs were similar in the two groups while some nonhematologic AEs were less common in the original lenalidomide group than the generic group. Only pyrexia as a grade 3-4 AE was more common in the original lenalidomide than the generic lenalidomide group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the generic form of lenalidomide has similar efficacy with the original form of lenalidomide in the treatment of RRMM. The AEs of original lenalidomide were generally fewer than those of generic lenalidomide. Further studies involving a larger number of patients with RRMM would be useful for comparing the efficacy and AEs of original and generic lenalidomide. Galenos Publishing 2021-03 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7927438/ /pubmed/33342205 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2020.2020.0169 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Hematology / Turkish Journal of Hematology, Published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bolaman, Ali Zahit
Turgutkaya, Atakan
Sahip, Birsen
Selim, Cem
Eroğlu Küçükdiler, Hilal
Ertop, Şehmus
Sargın, Gökhan
Yavaşoğlu, İrfan
Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title_full Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title_fullStr Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title_full_unstemmed Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title_short Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events
title_sort original versus generic lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: comparison of efficacy and adverse events
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342205
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2020.2020.0169
work_keys_str_mv AT bolamanalizahit originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT turgutkayaatakan originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT sahipbirsen originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT selimcem originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT eroglukucukdilerhilal originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT ertopsehmus originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT sargıngokhan originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents
AT yavasogluirfan originalversusgenericlenalidomideinpatientswithrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomacomparisonofefficacyandadverseevents