Cargando…

Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping

This paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assuranc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obšteter, Jana, Jenko, Janez, Gorjanc, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.637017
_version_ 1783659850584031232
author Obšteter, Jana
Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
author_facet Obšteter, Jana
Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
author_sort Obšteter, Jana
collection PubMed
description This paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assurance for producers. Genomic selection decoupled phenotyping and selection and through this increased genetic gain per year compared to the conventional selection. Although genomic selection is established in well-resourced breeding programs, small populations and developing countries still struggle with the implementation. The main issues include the lack of training animals and lack of financial resources. To address this, we simulated a case-study of a small dairy population with a number of scenarios with equal available resources yet varied use of resources for phenotyping and genotyping. The conventional progeny testing scenario collected 11 phenotypic records per lactation. In genomic selection scenarios, we reduced phenotyping to between 10 and 1 phenotypic records per lactation and invested the saved resources into genotyping. We tested these scenarios at different relative prices of phenotyping to genotyping and with or without an initial training population for genomic selection. Reallocating a part of phenotyping resources for repeated milk records to genotyping increased genetic gain compared to the conventional selection scenario regardless of the amount and relative cost of phenotyping, and the availability of an initial training population. Genetic gain increased by increasing genotyping, despite reduced phenotyping. High-genotyping scenarios even saved resources. Genomic selection scenarios expectedly increased accuracy for young non-phenotyped candidate males and females, but also proven females. This study shows that breeding programs should optimize investment into phenotyping and genotyping to maximize return on investment. Our results suggest that any dairy breeding program using conventional progeny testing with repeated milk records can implement genomic selection without increasing the level of investment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7928407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79284072021-03-04 Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping Obšteter, Jana Jenko, Janez Gorjanc, Gregor Front Genet Genetics This paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assurance for producers. Genomic selection decoupled phenotyping and selection and through this increased genetic gain per year compared to the conventional selection. Although genomic selection is established in well-resourced breeding programs, small populations and developing countries still struggle with the implementation. The main issues include the lack of training animals and lack of financial resources. To address this, we simulated a case-study of a small dairy population with a number of scenarios with equal available resources yet varied use of resources for phenotyping and genotyping. The conventional progeny testing scenario collected 11 phenotypic records per lactation. In genomic selection scenarios, we reduced phenotyping to between 10 and 1 phenotypic records per lactation and invested the saved resources into genotyping. We tested these scenarios at different relative prices of phenotyping to genotyping and with or without an initial training population for genomic selection. Reallocating a part of phenotyping resources for repeated milk records to genotyping increased genetic gain compared to the conventional selection scenario regardless of the amount and relative cost of phenotyping, and the availability of an initial training population. Genetic gain increased by increasing genotyping, despite reduced phenotyping. High-genotyping scenarios even saved resources. Genomic selection scenarios expectedly increased accuracy for young non-phenotyped candidate males and females, but also proven females. This study shows that breeding programs should optimize investment into phenotyping and genotyping to maximize return on investment. Our results suggest that any dairy breeding program using conventional progeny testing with repeated milk records can implement genomic selection without increasing the level of investment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7928407/ /pubmed/33679899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.637017 Text en Copyright © 2021 Obšteter, Jenko and Gorjanc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Obšteter, Jana
Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title_full Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title_fullStr Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title_short Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping
title_sort genomic selection for any dairy breeding program via optimized investment in phenotyping and genotyping
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.637017
work_keys_str_mv AT obsteterjana genomicselectionforanydairybreedingprogramviaoptimizedinvestmentinphenotypingandgenotyping
AT jenkojanez genomicselectionforanydairybreedingprogramviaoptimizedinvestmentinphenotypingandgenotyping
AT gorjancgregor genomicselectionforanydairybreedingprogramviaoptimizedinvestmentinphenotypingandgenotyping