Cargando…

Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies

BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prada, Joaquín M, Stolk, Wilma A, Davis, Emma L, Touloupou, Panayiota, Sharma, Swarnali, Muñoz, Johanna, Caja Rivera, Rocio M, Reimer, Lisa J, Michael, Edwin, de Vlas, Sake J, Hollingsworth, T Déirdre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004
_version_ 1783659888771072000
author Prada, Joaquín M
Stolk, Wilma A
Davis, Emma L
Touloupou, Panayiota
Sharma, Swarnali
Muñoz, Johanna
Caja Rivera, Rocio M
Reimer, Lisa J
Michael, Edwin
de Vlas, Sake J
Hollingsworth, T Déirdre
author_facet Prada, Joaquín M
Stolk, Wilma A
Davis, Emma L
Touloupou, Panayiota
Sharma, Swarnali
Muñoz, Johanna
Caja Rivera, Rocio M
Reimer, Lisa J
Michael, Edwin
de Vlas, Sake J
Hollingsworth, T Déirdre
author_sort Prada, Joaquín M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds and explore possible mitigation strategies. METHODS: We used three established LF transmission models to simulate infection trends in settings with annual treatment rounds and programme delays in 2020 of 6, 12, 18 or 24 months. We then evaluated the impact of various mitigation strategies upon resuming activities. RESULTS: The delay in achieving the elimination goals is on average similar to the number of years the treatment rounds are missed. Enhanced interventions implemented for as little as 1 y can allow catch-up on the progress lost and, if maintained throughout the programme, can lead to acceleration of up to 3 y. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a short delay in the programme does not cause a major delay in achieving the goals. Impact is strongest in high-endemicity areas. Mitigation strategies such as biannual treatment or increased coverage are key to minimizing the impact of the disruption once the programme resumes and lead to potential acceleration should these enhanced strategies be maintained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7928650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79286502021-03-04 Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies Prada, Joaquín M Stolk, Wilma A Davis, Emma L Touloupou, Panayiota Sharma, Swarnali Muñoz, Johanna Caja Rivera, Rocio M Reimer, Lisa J Michael, Edwin de Vlas, Sake J Hollingsworth, T Déirdre Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Invited Paper BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds and explore possible mitigation strategies. METHODS: We used three established LF transmission models to simulate infection trends in settings with annual treatment rounds and programme delays in 2020 of 6, 12, 18 or 24 months. We then evaluated the impact of various mitigation strategies upon resuming activities. RESULTS: The delay in achieving the elimination goals is on average similar to the number of years the treatment rounds are missed. Enhanced interventions implemented for as little as 1 y can allow catch-up on the progress lost and, if maintained throughout the programme, can lead to acceleration of up to 3 y. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a short delay in the programme does not cause a major delay in achieving the goals. Impact is strongest in high-endemicity areas. Mitigation strategies such as biannual treatment or increased coverage are key to minimizing the impact of the disruption once the programme resumes and lead to potential acceleration should these enhanced strategies be maintained. Oxford University Press 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7928650/ /pubmed/33515454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Paper
Prada, Joaquín M
Stolk, Wilma A
Davis, Emma L
Touloupou, Panayiota
Sharma, Swarnali
Muñoz, Johanna
Caja Rivera, Rocio M
Reimer, Lisa J
Michael, Edwin
de Vlas, Sake J
Hollingsworth, T Déirdre
Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title_full Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title_fullStr Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title_short Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
title_sort delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to covid-19, and possible mitigation strategies
topic Invited Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004
work_keys_str_mv AT pradajoaquinm delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT stolkwilmaa delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT davisemmal delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT touloupoupanayiota delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT sharmaswarnali delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT munozjohanna delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT cajariverarociom delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT reimerlisaj delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT michaeledwin delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT devlassakej delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies
AT hollingsworthtdeirdre delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies