Cargando…
Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies
BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004 |
_version_ | 1783659888771072000 |
---|---|
author | Prada, Joaquín M Stolk, Wilma A Davis, Emma L Touloupou, Panayiota Sharma, Swarnali Muñoz, Johanna Caja Rivera, Rocio M Reimer, Lisa J Michael, Edwin de Vlas, Sake J Hollingsworth, T Déirdre |
author_facet | Prada, Joaquín M Stolk, Wilma A Davis, Emma L Touloupou, Panayiota Sharma, Swarnali Muñoz, Johanna Caja Rivera, Rocio M Reimer, Lisa J Michael, Edwin de Vlas, Sake J Hollingsworth, T Déirdre |
author_sort | Prada, Joaquín M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds and explore possible mitigation strategies. METHODS: We used three established LF transmission models to simulate infection trends in settings with annual treatment rounds and programme delays in 2020 of 6, 12, 18 or 24 months. We then evaluated the impact of various mitigation strategies upon resuming activities. RESULTS: The delay in achieving the elimination goals is on average similar to the number of years the treatment rounds are missed. Enhanced interventions implemented for as little as 1 y can allow catch-up on the progress lost and, if maintained throughout the programme, can lead to acceleration of up to 3 y. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a short delay in the programme does not cause a major delay in achieving the goals. Impact is strongest in high-endemicity areas. Mitigation strategies such as biannual treatment or increased coverage are key to minimizing the impact of the disruption once the programme resumes and lead to potential acceleration should these enhanced strategies be maintained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7928650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79286502021-03-04 Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies Prada, Joaquín M Stolk, Wilma A Davis, Emma L Touloupou, Panayiota Sharma, Swarnali Muñoz, Johanna Caja Rivera, Rocio M Reimer, Lisa J Michael, Edwin de Vlas, Sake J Hollingsworth, T Déirdre Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Invited Paper BACKGROUND: In view of the current global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, mass drug administration interventions for neglected tropical diseases, including lymphatic filariasis (LF), have been halted. We used mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of delaying or cancelling treatment rounds and explore possible mitigation strategies. METHODS: We used three established LF transmission models to simulate infection trends in settings with annual treatment rounds and programme delays in 2020 of 6, 12, 18 or 24 months. We then evaluated the impact of various mitigation strategies upon resuming activities. RESULTS: The delay in achieving the elimination goals is on average similar to the number of years the treatment rounds are missed. Enhanced interventions implemented for as little as 1 y can allow catch-up on the progress lost and, if maintained throughout the programme, can lead to acceleration of up to 3 y. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a short delay in the programme does not cause a major delay in achieving the goals. Impact is strongest in high-endemicity areas. Mitigation strategies such as biannual treatment or increased coverage are key to minimizing the impact of the disruption once the programme resumes and lead to potential acceleration should these enhanced strategies be maintained. Oxford University Press 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7928650/ /pubmed/33515454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Paper Prada, Joaquín M Stolk, Wilma A Davis, Emma L Touloupou, Panayiota Sharma, Swarnali Muñoz, Johanna Caja Rivera, Rocio M Reimer, Lisa J Michael, Edwin de Vlas, Sake J Hollingsworth, T Déirdre Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title | Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title_full | Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title_fullStr | Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title_short | Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
title_sort | delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to covid-19, and possible mitigation strategies |
topic | Invited Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7928650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33515454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pradajoaquinm delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT stolkwilmaa delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT davisemmal delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT touloupoupanayiota delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT sharmaswarnali delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT munozjohanna delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT cajariverarociom delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT reimerlisaj delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT michaeledwin delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT devlassakej delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies AT hollingsworthtdeirdre delaysinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesduetocovid19andpossiblemitigationstrategies |