Cargando…

Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?

PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of the proceedings of the symposium “Tackling the Challenges of Nanomedicines: Are We Ready?” organized by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Hospital Pharmacy Section and Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) Working Group at the 2019 FIP Worl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertig, John B, Shah, Vinod P, Flühmann, Beat, Mühlebach, Stefan, Stemer, Gunar, Surugue, Jacqueline, Moss, Rob, Di Francesco, Tiziana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33599767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab048
_version_ 1783659921258053632
author Hertig, John B
Shah, Vinod P
Flühmann, Beat
Mühlebach, Stefan
Stemer, Gunar
Surugue, Jacqueline
Moss, Rob
Di Francesco, Tiziana
author_facet Hertig, John B
Shah, Vinod P
Flühmann, Beat
Mühlebach, Stefan
Stemer, Gunar
Surugue, Jacqueline
Moss, Rob
Di Francesco, Tiziana
author_sort Hertig, John B
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of the proceedings of the symposium “Tackling the Challenges of Nanomedicines: Are We Ready?” organized by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Hospital Pharmacy Section and Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) Working Group at the 2019 FIP World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Debate centered on reasons underlying the current complex regulatory landscape for nanomedicines and their follow-on products (referred to as nanosimilars) and the pivotal role of hospital pharmacists in selecting, handling, and guiding usage of nanomedicines and nanosimilars. SUMMARY: The evaluation and use of nanomedicines are recognized among scientific, pharmaceutical, and regulatory bodies as complex. Interchangeability and substitutability of nanomedicines and nanosimilars are confounded by a lack of pharmaceutical and pharmacological equivalence, reflecting the inherent complex nature of these drug products and manufacturing processes. Consequences include implications for clinical safety and efficacy and, ultimately, comparability. Local regulatory approvals of some nanomedicines have occurred, but there is no standard to ensure streamlined evaluation and use of consistent measures of therapeutic equivalence of reference products and their nanosimilars. Hospital pharmacists are expected to be experts in the selection, handling, and substitution of nanomedicines and familiarize themselves with the limitations of current methods of assessing pharmaceutical and clinical equivalence of nanosimilars in order to ensure informed formulary decision-making and eventual patient benefit. CONCLUSION: Supportive guidance for pharmacists focusing on the substitutability and/or interchangeability of nanomedicines and their nanosimilars is needed. Current FIP guidance for pharmacists on therapeutic interchange and substitution should be extended to include nanomedicines and nanosimilars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79293902021-03-04 Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready? Hertig, John B Shah, Vinod P Flühmann, Beat Mühlebach, Stefan Stemer, Gunar Surugue, Jacqueline Moss, Rob Di Francesco, Tiziana Am J Health Syst Pharm Primer PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of the proceedings of the symposium “Tackling the Challenges of Nanomedicines: Are We Ready?” organized by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Hospital Pharmacy Section and Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) Working Group at the 2019 FIP World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Debate centered on reasons underlying the current complex regulatory landscape for nanomedicines and their follow-on products (referred to as nanosimilars) and the pivotal role of hospital pharmacists in selecting, handling, and guiding usage of nanomedicines and nanosimilars. SUMMARY: The evaluation and use of nanomedicines are recognized among scientific, pharmaceutical, and regulatory bodies as complex. Interchangeability and substitutability of nanomedicines and nanosimilars are confounded by a lack of pharmaceutical and pharmacological equivalence, reflecting the inherent complex nature of these drug products and manufacturing processes. Consequences include implications for clinical safety and efficacy and, ultimately, comparability. Local regulatory approvals of some nanomedicines have occurred, but there is no standard to ensure streamlined evaluation and use of consistent measures of therapeutic equivalence of reference products and their nanosimilars. Hospital pharmacists are expected to be experts in the selection, handling, and substitution of nanomedicines and familiarize themselves with the limitations of current methods of assessing pharmaceutical and clinical equivalence of nanosimilars in order to ensure informed formulary decision-making and eventual patient benefit. CONCLUSION: Supportive guidance for pharmacists focusing on the substitutability and/or interchangeability of nanomedicines and their nanosimilars is needed. Current FIP guidance for pharmacists on therapeutic interchange and substitution should be extended to include nanomedicines and nanosimilars. Oxford University Press 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7929390/ /pubmed/33599767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab048 Text en © American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Primer
Hertig, John B
Shah, Vinod P
Flühmann, Beat
Mühlebach, Stefan
Stemer, Gunar
Surugue, Jacqueline
Moss, Rob
Di Francesco, Tiziana
Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title_full Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title_fullStr Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title_full_unstemmed Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title_short Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
title_sort tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?
topic Primer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33599767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab048
work_keys_str_mv AT hertigjohnb tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT shahvinodp tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT fluhmannbeat tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT muhlebachstefan tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT stemergunar tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT suruguejacqueline tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT mossrob tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready
AT difrancescotiziana tacklingthechallengesofnanomedicinesareweready