Cargando…
Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595451 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221 |
_version_ | 1783659975672856576 |
---|---|
author | Lennartz, Simon Dratsch, Thomas Zopfs, David Persigehl, Thorsten Maintz, David Große Hokamp, Nils Pinto dos Santos, Daniel |
author_facet | Lennartz, Simon Dratsch, Thomas Zopfs, David Persigehl, Thorsten Maintz, David Große Hokamp, Nils Pinto dos Santos, Daniel |
author_sort | Lennartz, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow and the level of control and supervision under which they would deem the application of AI in medicine acceptable. METHODS: Patients scheduled for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily participated in an anonymized questionnaire between February 10, 2020, and May 24, 2020. Patient information, confidence in physicians vs AI in different clinical tasks, opinions on the control of AI, preference in cases of disagreement between AI and physicians, and acceptance of the use of AI for diagnosing and treating diseases of different severity were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients participated. Patients favored physicians over AI for all clinical tasks except for treatment planning based on current scientific evidence. In case of disagreement between physicians and AI regarding diagnosis and treatment planning, most patients preferred the physician’s opinion to AI (96.2% [153/159] vs 3.8% [6/159] and 94.8% [146/154] vs 5.2% [8/154], respectively; P=.001). AI supervised by a physician was considered more acceptable than AI without physician supervision at diagnosis (confidence rating 3.90 [SD 1.20] vs 1.64 [SD 1.03], respectively; P=.001) and therapy (3.77 [SD 1.18] vs 1.57 [SD 0.96], respectively; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients favored physicians over AI in most clinical tasks and strongly preferred an application of AI with physician supervision. However, patients acknowledged that AI could help physicians integrate the most recent scientific evidence into medical care. Application of AI in medicine should be disclosed and controlled to protect patient interests and meet ethical standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7929746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79297462021-03-05 Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives Lennartz, Simon Dratsch, Thomas Zopfs, David Persigehl, Thorsten Maintz, David Große Hokamp, Nils Pinto dos Santos, Daniel J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow and the level of control and supervision under which they would deem the application of AI in medicine acceptable. METHODS: Patients scheduled for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily participated in an anonymized questionnaire between February 10, 2020, and May 24, 2020. Patient information, confidence in physicians vs AI in different clinical tasks, opinions on the control of AI, preference in cases of disagreement between AI and physicians, and acceptance of the use of AI for diagnosing and treating diseases of different severity were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients participated. Patients favored physicians over AI for all clinical tasks except for treatment planning based on current scientific evidence. In case of disagreement between physicians and AI regarding diagnosis and treatment planning, most patients preferred the physician’s opinion to AI (96.2% [153/159] vs 3.8% [6/159] and 94.8% [146/154] vs 5.2% [8/154], respectively; P=.001). AI supervised by a physician was considered more acceptable than AI without physician supervision at diagnosis (confidence rating 3.90 [SD 1.20] vs 1.64 [SD 1.03], respectively; P=.001) and therapy (3.77 [SD 1.18] vs 1.57 [SD 0.96], respectively; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients favored physicians over AI in most clinical tasks and strongly preferred an application of AI with physician supervision. However, patients acknowledged that AI could help physicians integrate the most recent scientific evidence into medical care. Application of AI in medicine should be disclosed and controlled to protect patient interests and meet ethical standards. JMIR Publications 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7929746/ /pubmed/33595451 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221 Text en ©Simon Lennartz, Thomas Dratsch, David Zopfs, Thorsten Persigehl, David Maintz, Nils Große Hokamp, Daniel Pinto dos Santos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.02.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lennartz, Simon Dratsch, Thomas Zopfs, David Persigehl, Thorsten Maintz, David Große Hokamp, Nils Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title | Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title_full | Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title_short | Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives |
title_sort | use and control of artificial intelligence in patients across the medical workflow: single-center questionnaire study of patient perspectives |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595451 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lennartzsimon useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT dratschthomas useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT zopfsdavid useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT persigehlthorsten useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT maintzdavid useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT großehokampnils useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives AT pintodossantosdaniel useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives |