Cargando…

Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lennartz, Simon, Dratsch, Thomas, Zopfs, David, Persigehl, Thorsten, Maintz, David, Große Hokamp, Nils, Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595451
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221
_version_ 1783659975672856576
author Lennartz, Simon
Dratsch, Thomas
Zopfs, David
Persigehl, Thorsten
Maintz, David
Große Hokamp, Nils
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
author_facet Lennartz, Simon
Dratsch, Thomas
Zopfs, David
Persigehl, Thorsten
Maintz, David
Große Hokamp, Nils
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
author_sort Lennartz, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow and the level of control and supervision under which they would deem the application of AI in medicine acceptable. METHODS: Patients scheduled for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily participated in an anonymized questionnaire between February 10, 2020, and May 24, 2020. Patient information, confidence in physicians vs AI in different clinical tasks, opinions on the control of AI, preference in cases of disagreement between AI and physicians, and acceptance of the use of AI for diagnosing and treating diseases of different severity were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients participated. Patients favored physicians over AI for all clinical tasks except for treatment planning based on current scientific evidence. In case of disagreement between physicians and AI regarding diagnosis and treatment planning, most patients preferred the physician’s opinion to AI (96.2% [153/159] vs 3.8% [6/159] and 94.8% [146/154] vs 5.2% [8/154], respectively; P=.001). AI supervised by a physician was considered more acceptable than AI without physician supervision at diagnosis (confidence rating 3.90 [SD 1.20] vs 1.64 [SD 1.03], respectively; P=.001) and therapy (3.77 [SD 1.18] vs 1.57 [SD 0.96], respectively; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients favored physicians over AI in most clinical tasks and strongly preferred an application of AI with physician supervision. However, patients acknowledged that AI could help physicians integrate the most recent scientific evidence into medical care. Application of AI in medicine should be disclosed and controlled to protect patient interests and meet ethical standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79297462021-03-05 Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives Lennartz, Simon Dratsch, Thomas Zopfs, David Persigehl, Thorsten Maintz, David Große Hokamp, Nils Pinto dos Santos, Daniel J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing importance in many medical specialties, yet data on patients’ opinions on the use of AI in medicine are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate patients’ opinions on the use of AI in different aspects of the medical workflow and the level of control and supervision under which they would deem the application of AI in medicine acceptable. METHODS: Patients scheduled for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging voluntarily participated in an anonymized questionnaire between February 10, 2020, and May 24, 2020. Patient information, confidence in physicians vs AI in different clinical tasks, opinions on the control of AI, preference in cases of disagreement between AI and physicians, and acceptance of the use of AI for diagnosing and treating diseases of different severity were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients participated. Patients favored physicians over AI for all clinical tasks except for treatment planning based on current scientific evidence. In case of disagreement between physicians and AI regarding diagnosis and treatment planning, most patients preferred the physician’s opinion to AI (96.2% [153/159] vs 3.8% [6/159] and 94.8% [146/154] vs 5.2% [8/154], respectively; P=.001). AI supervised by a physician was considered more acceptable than AI without physician supervision at diagnosis (confidence rating 3.90 [SD 1.20] vs 1.64 [SD 1.03], respectively; P=.001) and therapy (3.77 [SD 1.18] vs 1.57 [SD 0.96], respectively; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients favored physicians over AI in most clinical tasks and strongly preferred an application of AI with physician supervision. However, patients acknowledged that AI could help physicians integrate the most recent scientific evidence into medical care. Application of AI in medicine should be disclosed and controlled to protect patient interests and meet ethical standards. JMIR Publications 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7929746/ /pubmed/33595451 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221 Text en ©Simon Lennartz, Thomas Dratsch, David Zopfs, Thorsten Persigehl, David Maintz, Nils Große Hokamp, Daniel Pinto dos Santos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.02.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lennartz, Simon
Dratsch, Thomas
Zopfs, David
Persigehl, Thorsten
Maintz, David
Große Hokamp, Nils
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title_full Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title_fullStr Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title_short Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives
title_sort use and control of artificial intelligence in patients across the medical workflow: single-center questionnaire study of patient perspectives
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595451
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24221
work_keys_str_mv AT lennartzsimon useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT dratschthomas useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT zopfsdavid useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT persigehlthorsten useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT maintzdavid useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT großehokampnils useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives
AT pintodossantosdaniel useandcontrolofartificialintelligenceinpatientsacrossthemedicalworkflowsinglecenterquestionnairestudyofpatientperspectives