Cargando…

Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey

BACKGROUND: The human embryo or foetus is susceptible to harmful effects of radiation, which include growth delay, malformations, impaired cognitive function, cancer and foetal demise. The purpose of this study is to describe pregnancy screening practices in radiation oncology, so that potential hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaki, Peter, Zhu, Junjia, Mackley, Heath B, Rosenberg, Jennifer C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1169
_version_ 1783659980159713280
author Zaki, Peter
Zhu, Junjia
Mackley, Heath B
Rosenberg, Jennifer C
author_facet Zaki, Peter
Zhu, Junjia
Mackley, Heath B
Rosenberg, Jennifer C
author_sort Zaki, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The human embryo or foetus is susceptible to harmful effects of radiation, which include growth delay, malformations, impaired cognitive function, cancer and foetal demise. The purpose of this study is to describe pregnancy screening practices in radiation oncology, so that potential health effects may be avoided and areas of prevention may be identified. METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 6,304 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the world. Chi-square tests and a multiple logistic regression model were used to analyse the data. All tests were two-sided and the statistical significance level used was 0.05. This study (STUDY00009765) was approved by an Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 434 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these respondents, 69.1% were practicing in the United States. Of all respondents, 19.8% reported treating paediatric patients and 93.6% reported treating premenopausal patients. Despite 84.8% of radiation oncologists saying they would ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ that one should screen for pregnancy prior to radiation therapy, 29.7% of respondents reported their department has no screening policy and 7.1% of respondents reported they do not screen for pregnancy. Having a departmental policy was associated with screening for pregnancy (p-value = 0.0005). Of all respondents, 93 reported treating a known pregnant patient. Of these 93 respondents, 76 reported intentionally treating and 17 reported accidentally treating a pregnant patient. Respondents who did not screen at time of simulation were significantly more likely to treat a pregnant patient than those who screened at time of simulation (p-value = 0.0459). CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity exists among practicing radiation oncologists regarding pregnancy screening. Institutional policies should be clear and consistent. All members of the radiation oncology team should make every effort to minimise unintended radiation exposure to the embryo or foetus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79297652021-03-05 Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey Zaki, Peter Zhu, Junjia Mackley, Heath B Rosenberg, Jennifer C Ecancermedicalscience Research BACKGROUND: The human embryo or foetus is susceptible to harmful effects of radiation, which include growth delay, malformations, impaired cognitive function, cancer and foetal demise. The purpose of this study is to describe pregnancy screening practices in radiation oncology, so that potential health effects may be avoided and areas of prevention may be identified. METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 6,304 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the world. Chi-square tests and a multiple logistic regression model were used to analyse the data. All tests were two-sided and the statistical significance level used was 0.05. This study (STUDY00009765) was approved by an Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 434 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these respondents, 69.1% were practicing in the United States. Of all respondents, 19.8% reported treating paediatric patients and 93.6% reported treating premenopausal patients. Despite 84.8% of radiation oncologists saying they would ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ that one should screen for pregnancy prior to radiation therapy, 29.7% of respondents reported their department has no screening policy and 7.1% of respondents reported they do not screen for pregnancy. Having a departmental policy was associated with screening for pregnancy (p-value = 0.0005). Of all respondents, 93 reported treating a known pregnant patient. Of these 93 respondents, 76 reported intentionally treating and 17 reported accidentally treating a pregnant patient. Respondents who did not screen at time of simulation were significantly more likely to treat a pregnant patient than those who screened at time of simulation (p-value = 0.0459). CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity exists among practicing radiation oncologists regarding pregnancy screening. Institutional policies should be clear and consistent. All members of the radiation oncology team should make every effort to minimise unintended radiation exposure to the embryo or foetus. Cancer Intelligence 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7929765/ /pubmed/33680083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1169 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zaki, Peter
Zhu, Junjia
Mackley, Heath B
Rosenberg, Jennifer C
Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title_full Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title_fullStr Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title_short Pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
title_sort pregnancy screening practices and treatment of pregnant patients among radiation oncologists: results of an international survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1169
work_keys_str_mv AT zakipeter pregnancyscreeningpracticesandtreatmentofpregnantpatientsamongradiationoncologistsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT zhujunjia pregnancyscreeningpracticesandtreatmentofpregnantpatientsamongradiationoncologistsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT mackleyheathb pregnancyscreeningpracticesandtreatmentofpregnantpatientsamongradiationoncologistsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT rosenbergjenniferc pregnancyscreeningpracticesandtreatmentofpregnantpatientsamongradiationoncologistsresultsofaninternationalsurvey