Cargando…

Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: Currently, the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing in the treatment of breast cancer. Variability in the expression of biomarkers following neoadjuvant treatment has been observed, which could be accompanied by changes in the adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVES: The primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Candás, Gabriela, García, Alejandra, Ocampo, María Delfina, Korbenfeld, Ernesto, Vuoto, H. Daniel, Isetta, Juan, Cogorno, Lucas, Zimmermann, Agustina González, Sigal, Marca, Acevedo, Santiago, Berwart, Julia, Naveira, Martín, Bemi, Agustina, Uriburu, Juan Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1162
_version_ 1783659981563756544
author Candás, Gabriela
García, Alejandra
Ocampo, María Delfina
Korbenfeld, Ernesto
Vuoto, H. Daniel
Isetta, Juan
Cogorno, Lucas
Zimmermann, Agustina González
Sigal, Marca
Acevedo, Santiago
Berwart, Julia
Naveira, Martín
Bemi, Agustina
Uriburu, Juan Luis
author_facet Candás, Gabriela
García, Alejandra
Ocampo, María Delfina
Korbenfeld, Ernesto
Vuoto, H. Daniel
Isetta, Juan
Cogorno, Lucas
Zimmermann, Agustina González
Sigal, Marca
Acevedo, Santiago
Berwart, Julia
Naveira, Martín
Bemi, Agustina
Uriburu, Juan Luis
author_sort Candás, Gabriela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Currently, the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing in the treatment of breast cancer. Variability in the expression of biomarkers following neoadjuvant treatment has been observed, which could be accompanied by changes in the adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the variability of biomarkers prior to and following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary objectives were to determine which tumour subtype (as determined by immunohistochemical markers) most frequently achieved pathological complete response (pCR); whether the biomarker variation resulted in a change in immunophenotype and subsequently modification to the adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery in the Breast Care Service of the Buenos Aires British Hospital between January 2009 and June 2020. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients were included. The pCR rate was 28.5%. The tumour immunophenotype that achieved pCR most frequently was the hormone receptor negative /HER2+ group with a value of 85.2%. The analysis was carried out on the 123 patients with residual disease. The observed variability for oestrogen receptors (ER) was 8.9%, for progesterone receptors (PR), 29.9% and for HER2, 13.8%. These changes were statistically significant. There were changes to the tumour immunophenotype in 26 cases (21.1%) with modifications to the adjuvant treatment in nine of these (34.6%; 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed statistically significant variability in the expression of ER, PR and HER2 prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, which identified modifications in the tumour immunophenotype in 21.1%, and changes to the adjuvant treatment in 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease, justifying the re-assay of biomarkers in the surgical specimen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79297712021-03-05 Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer Candás, Gabriela García, Alejandra Ocampo, María Delfina Korbenfeld, Ernesto Vuoto, H. Daniel Isetta, Juan Cogorno, Lucas Zimmermann, Agustina González Sigal, Marca Acevedo, Santiago Berwart, Julia Naveira, Martín Bemi, Agustina Uriburu, Juan Luis Ecancermedicalscience Clinical Study INTRODUCTION: Currently, the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing in the treatment of breast cancer. Variability in the expression of biomarkers following neoadjuvant treatment has been observed, which could be accompanied by changes in the adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the variability of biomarkers prior to and following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary objectives were to determine which tumour subtype (as determined by immunohistochemical markers) most frequently achieved pathological complete response (pCR); whether the biomarker variation resulted in a change in immunophenotype and subsequently modification to the adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery in the Breast Care Service of the Buenos Aires British Hospital between January 2009 and June 2020. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients were included. The pCR rate was 28.5%. The tumour immunophenotype that achieved pCR most frequently was the hormone receptor negative /HER2+ group with a value of 85.2%. The analysis was carried out on the 123 patients with residual disease. The observed variability for oestrogen receptors (ER) was 8.9%, for progesterone receptors (PR), 29.9% and for HER2, 13.8%. These changes were statistically significant. There were changes to the tumour immunophenotype in 26 cases (21.1%) with modifications to the adjuvant treatment in nine of these (34.6%; 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed statistically significant variability in the expression of ER, PR and HER2 prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, which identified modifications in the tumour immunophenotype in 21.1%, and changes to the adjuvant treatment in 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease, justifying the re-assay of biomarkers in the surgical specimen. Cancer Intelligence 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7929771/ /pubmed/33680076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1162 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Candás, Gabriela
García, Alejandra
Ocampo, María Delfina
Korbenfeld, Ernesto
Vuoto, H. Daniel
Isetta, Juan
Cogorno, Lucas
Zimmermann, Agustina González
Sigal, Marca
Acevedo, Santiago
Berwart, Julia
Naveira, Martín
Bemi, Agustina
Uriburu, Juan Luis
Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title_full Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title_fullStr Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title_short Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
title_sort impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1162
work_keys_str_mv AT candasgabriela impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT garciaalejandra impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT ocampomariadelfina impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT korbenfeldernesto impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT vuotohdaniel impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT isettajuan impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT cogornolucas impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT zimmermannagustinagonzalez impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sigalmarca impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT acevedosantiago impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT berwartjulia impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT naveiramartin impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT bemiagustina impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT uriburujuanluis impactofimmunohistochemicalprofilechangesfollowingneoadjuvanttherapyinthetreatmentofbreastcancer