Cargando…
Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161 |
_version_ | 1783659982985625600 |
---|---|
author | Chakraborty, Santam Mallick, Indranil Luu, Hung N Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Arunsingh, Moses Achari, Rimpa Basu Chatterjee, Sanjoy |
author_facet | Chakraborty, Santam Mallick, Indranil Luu, Hung N Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Arunsingh, Moses Achari, Rimpa Basu Chatterjee, Sanjoy |
author_sort | Chakraborty, Santam |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The total sample size for each clinical trial was divided by the trial duration to get the sample size per year. This was then divided by the number of states in which accrual was planned to get the sample size per year per state (SSY). For interventional trials investigating a therapy, the SSY was divided by the number of incident cancers in the state to get the SSY per 1,000 incident cancer cases. The SSY data was then mapped to visualise the geographical disparity. RESULTS: We identified 181 ongoing studies, of which 132 were interventional studies. There was a substantial inter-state disparity—with a median SSY of 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases (range 0.00–296.81 per 1,000 incident cases) for therapeutic interventional studies. Disparities were starker when cancer site-wise SSY was considered. Even in the state with the highest SSY, only 29.7% of the newly diagnosed cancer cases have an available slot in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial. Disparities in access were also apparent between academic (range: 0.21–226.60) and industry-sponsored trials (range: 0.17–70.21). CONCLUSION: There are significant geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Future investigations should evaluate the reasons and mitigation approaches for such disparities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7929777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79297772021-03-05 Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India Chakraborty, Santam Mallick, Indranil Luu, Hung N Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Arunsingh, Moses Achari, Rimpa Basu Chatterjee, Sanjoy Ecancermedicalscience Research INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The total sample size for each clinical trial was divided by the trial duration to get the sample size per year. This was then divided by the number of states in which accrual was planned to get the sample size per year per state (SSY). For interventional trials investigating a therapy, the SSY was divided by the number of incident cancers in the state to get the SSY per 1,000 incident cancer cases. The SSY data was then mapped to visualise the geographical disparity. RESULTS: We identified 181 ongoing studies, of which 132 were interventional studies. There was a substantial inter-state disparity—with a median SSY of 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases (range 0.00–296.81 per 1,000 incident cases) for therapeutic interventional studies. Disparities were starker when cancer site-wise SSY was considered. Even in the state with the highest SSY, only 29.7% of the newly diagnosed cancer cases have an available slot in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial. Disparities in access were also apparent between academic (range: 0.21–226.60) and industry-sponsored trials (range: 0.17–70.21). CONCLUSION: There are significant geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Future investigations should evaluate the reasons and mitigation approaches for such disparities. Cancer Intelligence 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7929777/ /pubmed/33680075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Chakraborty, Santam Mallick, Indranil Luu, Hung N Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Arunsingh, Moses Achari, Rimpa Basu Chatterjee, Sanjoy Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title | Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title_full | Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title_fullStr | Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title_short | Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India |
title_sort | geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in india |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chakrabortysantam geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT mallickindranil geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT luuhungn geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT bhattacharyyatapesh geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT arunsinghmoses geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT acharirimpabasu geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia AT chatterjeesanjoy geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia |