Cargando…

Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India

INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chakraborty, Santam, Mallick, Indranil, Luu, Hung N, Bhattacharyya, Tapesh, Arunsingh, Moses, Achari, Rimpa Basu, Chatterjee, Sanjoy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161
_version_ 1783659982985625600
author Chakraborty, Santam
Mallick, Indranil
Luu, Hung N
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Arunsingh, Moses
Achari, Rimpa Basu
Chatterjee, Sanjoy
author_facet Chakraborty, Santam
Mallick, Indranil
Luu, Hung N
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Arunsingh, Moses
Achari, Rimpa Basu
Chatterjee, Sanjoy
author_sort Chakraborty, Santam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The total sample size for each clinical trial was divided by the trial duration to get the sample size per year. This was then divided by the number of states in which accrual was planned to get the sample size per year per state (SSY). For interventional trials investigating a therapy, the SSY was divided by the number of incident cancers in the state to get the SSY per 1,000 incident cancer cases. The SSY data was then mapped to visualise the geographical disparity. RESULTS: We identified 181 ongoing studies, of which 132 were interventional studies. There was a substantial inter-state disparity—with a median SSY of 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases (range 0.00–296.81 per 1,000 incident cases) for therapeutic interventional studies. Disparities were starker when cancer site-wise SSY was considered. Even in the state with the highest SSY, only 29.7% of the newly diagnosed cancer cases have an available slot in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial. Disparities in access were also apparent between academic (range: 0.21–226.60) and industry-sponsored trials (range: 0.17–70.21). CONCLUSION: There are significant geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Future investigations should evaluate the reasons and mitigation approaches for such disparities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79297772021-03-05 Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India Chakraborty, Santam Mallick, Indranil Luu, Hung N Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Arunsingh, Moses Achari, Rimpa Basu Chatterjee, Sanjoy Ecancermedicalscience Research INTRODUCTION: The current study was aimed at quantifying the disparity in geographic access to cancer clinical trials in India. METHODS: We collated data of cancer clinical trials from the Clinical Trial Registry of India and data on state-wise cancer incidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study. The total sample size for each clinical trial was divided by the trial duration to get the sample size per year. This was then divided by the number of states in which accrual was planned to get the sample size per year per state (SSY). For interventional trials investigating a therapy, the SSY was divided by the number of incident cancers in the state to get the SSY per 1,000 incident cancer cases. The SSY data was then mapped to visualise the geographical disparity. RESULTS: We identified 181 ongoing studies, of which 132 were interventional studies. There was a substantial inter-state disparity—with a median SSY of 1.55 per 1,000 incident cancer cases (range 0.00–296.81 per 1,000 incident cases) for therapeutic interventional studies. Disparities were starker when cancer site-wise SSY was considered. Even in the state with the highest SSY, only 29.7% of the newly diagnosed cancer cases have an available slot in a therapeutic cancer clinical trial. Disparities in access were also apparent between academic (range: 0.21–226.60) and industry-sponsored trials (range: 0.17–70.21). CONCLUSION: There are significant geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India. Future investigations should evaluate the reasons and mitigation approaches for such disparities. Cancer Intelligence 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7929777/ /pubmed/33680075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chakraborty, Santam
Mallick, Indranil
Luu, Hung N
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Arunsingh, Moses
Achari, Rimpa Basu
Chatterjee, Sanjoy
Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title_full Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title_fullStr Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title_full_unstemmed Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title_short Geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in India
title_sort geographic disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in india
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1161
work_keys_str_mv AT chakrabortysantam geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT mallickindranil geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT luuhungn geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT bhattacharyyatapesh geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT arunsinghmoses geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT acharirimpabasu geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia
AT chatterjeesanjoy geographicdisparitiesinaccesstocancerclinicaltrialsinindia