Cargando…

Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial

SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osaki, M., Okuda, R., Saeki, Y., Okano, T., Tsuda, K., Nakamura, T., Morio, Y., Nagashima, H., Hagino, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6
_version_ 1783660013580976128
author Osaki, M.
Okuda, R.
Saeki, Y.
Okano, T.
Tsuda, K.
Nakamura, T.
Morio, Y.
Nagashima, H.
Hagino, H.
author_facet Osaki, M.
Okuda, R.
Saeki, Y.
Okano, T.
Tsuda, K.
Nakamura, T.
Morio, Y.
Nagashima, H.
Hagino, H.
author_sort Osaki, M.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients during a 2-year period. METHODS: A prospective intervention randomized control study was conducted at seven medical facilities from January 2015 to March 2017. Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old with fragility fractures were randomly divided into the coordinator intervention (LI; 70 patients) and without intervention (non-LI; 71 patients) groups. The osteoporosis treatment rate, osteoporosis treatment persistence rate, fall rate, fracture incidence rate, and bone density measurement rate 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after registration were compared between the two groups. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze data at each inspection period. RESULTS: The osteoporosis treatment initiation rate was significantly higher in the LI group than in the non-LI group (85.7% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.04). The LI group had significantly higher bone density assessment implementation rates than the non-LI group at the time of registration (90.0% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.00) and 6 months after registration (50.0% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.01), but not 1 or 2 years after registration. In addition, no significant differences in fall or fracture incidence rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The coordinator-based interventions for fragility fractures improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following bone fractures. The findings suggest that liaison intervention may help both fracture and osteoporosis physicians for the evaluation of osteoporosis and initiation and continuation of osteoporosis medication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7929967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79299672021-03-19 Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial Osaki, M. Okuda, R. Saeki, Y. Okano, T. Tsuda, K. Nakamura, T. Morio, Y. Nagashima, H. Hagino, H. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients during a 2-year period. METHODS: A prospective intervention randomized control study was conducted at seven medical facilities from January 2015 to March 2017. Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old with fragility fractures were randomly divided into the coordinator intervention (LI; 70 patients) and without intervention (non-LI; 71 patients) groups. The osteoporosis treatment rate, osteoporosis treatment persistence rate, fall rate, fracture incidence rate, and bone density measurement rate 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after registration were compared between the two groups. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze data at each inspection period. RESULTS: The osteoporosis treatment initiation rate was significantly higher in the LI group than in the non-LI group (85.7% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.04). The LI group had significantly higher bone density assessment implementation rates than the non-LI group at the time of registration (90.0% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.00) and 6 months after registration (50.0% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.01), but not 1 or 2 years after registration. In addition, no significant differences in fall or fracture incidence rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The coordinator-based interventions for fragility fractures improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following bone fractures. The findings suggest that liaison intervention may help both fracture and osteoporosis physicians for the evaluation of osteoporosis and initiation and continuation of osteoporosis medication. Springer London 2021-01-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7929967/ /pubmed/33483796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Osaki, M.
Okuda, R.
Saeki, Y.
Okano, T.
Tsuda, K.
Nakamura, T.
Morio, Y.
Nagashima, H.
Hagino, H.
Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title_full Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title_fullStr Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title_short Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
title_sort efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6
work_keys_str_mv AT osakim efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT okudar efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT saekiy efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT okanot efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT tsudak efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT nakamurat efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT morioy efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT nagashimah efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT haginoh efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial