Cargando…
Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial
SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6 |
_version_ | 1783660013580976128 |
---|---|
author | Osaki, M. Okuda, R. Saeki, Y. Okano, T. Tsuda, K. Nakamura, T. Morio, Y. Nagashima, H. Hagino, H. |
author_facet | Osaki, M. Okuda, R. Saeki, Y. Okano, T. Tsuda, K. Nakamura, T. Morio, Y. Nagashima, H. Hagino, H. |
author_sort | Osaki, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients during a 2-year period. METHODS: A prospective intervention randomized control study was conducted at seven medical facilities from January 2015 to March 2017. Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old with fragility fractures were randomly divided into the coordinator intervention (LI; 70 patients) and without intervention (non-LI; 71 patients) groups. The osteoporosis treatment rate, osteoporosis treatment persistence rate, fall rate, fracture incidence rate, and bone density measurement rate 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after registration were compared between the two groups. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze data at each inspection period. RESULTS: The osteoporosis treatment initiation rate was significantly higher in the LI group than in the non-LI group (85.7% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.04). The LI group had significantly higher bone density assessment implementation rates than the non-LI group at the time of registration (90.0% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.00) and 6 months after registration (50.0% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.01), but not 1 or 2 years after registration. In addition, no significant differences in fall or fracture incidence rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The coordinator-based interventions for fragility fractures improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following bone fractures. The findings suggest that liaison intervention may help both fracture and osteoporosis physicians for the evaluation of osteoporosis and initiation and continuation of osteoporosis medication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7929967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79299672021-03-19 Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial Osaki, M. Okuda, R. Saeki, Y. Okano, T. Tsuda, K. Nakamura, T. Morio, Y. Nagashima, H. Hagino, H. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: We examined the effectiveness of coordinators’ interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients during a 2-year period. METHODS: A prospective intervention randomized control study was conducted at seven medical facilities from January 2015 to March 2017. Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old with fragility fractures were randomly divided into the coordinator intervention (LI; 70 patients) and without intervention (non-LI; 71 patients) groups. The osteoporosis treatment rate, osteoporosis treatment persistence rate, fall rate, fracture incidence rate, and bone density measurement rate 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after registration were compared between the two groups. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze data at each inspection period. RESULTS: The osteoporosis treatment initiation rate was significantly higher in the LI group than in the non-LI group (85.7% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.04). The LI group had significantly higher bone density assessment implementation rates than the non-LI group at the time of registration (90.0% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.00) and 6 months after registration (50.0% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.01), but not 1 or 2 years after registration. In addition, no significant differences in fall or fracture incidence rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The coordinator-based interventions for fragility fractures improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following bone fractures. The findings suggest that liaison intervention may help both fracture and osteoporosis physicians for the evaluation of osteoporosis and initiation and continuation of osteoporosis medication. Springer London 2021-01-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7929967/ /pubmed/33483796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Osaki, M. Okuda, R. Saeki, Y. Okano, T. Tsuda, K. Nakamura, T. Morio, Y. Nagashima, H. Hagino, H. Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title | Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title_full | Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title_short | Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
title_sort | efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7929967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05825-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osakim efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT okudar efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT saekiy efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT okanot efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT tsudak efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT nakamurat efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT morioy efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT nagashimah efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT haginoh efficiencyofcoordinatorbasedosteoporosisinterventioninfragilityfracturepatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial |