Cargando…
Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the per...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385 |
_version_ | 1783660149505785856 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Jian Jensen, Winnie Geng, Bo Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Dosen, Strahinja |
author_facet | Dong, Jian Jensen, Winnie Geng, Bo Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Dosen, Strahinja |
author_sort | Dong, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. RESULTS: Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. CONCLUSION: Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7930737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79307372021-03-05 Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation Dong, Jian Jensen, Winnie Geng, Bo Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Dosen, Strahinja Front Neurosci Neuroscience AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. RESULTS: Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. CONCLUSION: Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7930737/ /pubmed/33679292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dong, Jensen, Geng, Kamavuako and Dosen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Dong, Jian Jensen, Winnie Geng, Bo Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Dosen, Strahinja Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title | Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title_full | Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title_short | Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation |
title_sort | online closed-loop control using tactile feedback delivered through surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongjian onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation AT jensenwinnie onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation AT gengbo onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation AT kamavuakoernestnlandu onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation AT dosenstrahinja onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation |