Cargando…

Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation

AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Jian, Jensen, Winnie, Geng, Bo, Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu, Dosen, Strahinja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385
_version_ 1783660149505785856
author Dong, Jian
Jensen, Winnie
Geng, Bo
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Dosen, Strahinja
author_facet Dong, Jian
Jensen, Winnie
Geng, Bo
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Dosen, Strahinja
author_sort Dong, Jian
collection PubMed
description AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. RESULTS: Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. CONCLUSION: Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7930737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79307372021-03-05 Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation Dong, Jian Jensen, Winnie Geng, Bo Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Dosen, Strahinja Front Neurosci Neuroscience AIM: Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. RESULTS: Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. CONCLUSION: Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7930737/ /pubmed/33679292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dong, Jensen, Geng, Kamavuako and Dosen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Dong, Jian
Jensen, Winnie
Geng, Bo
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Dosen, Strahinja
Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title_full Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title_fullStr Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title_short Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation
title_sort online closed-loop control using tactile feedback delivered through surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.580385
work_keys_str_mv AT dongjian onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation
AT jensenwinnie onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation
AT gengbo onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation
AT kamavuakoernestnlandu onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation
AT dosenstrahinja onlineclosedloopcontrolusingtactilefeedbackdeliveredthroughsurfaceandsubdermalelectrotactilestimulation