Cargando…

Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION: There has been an exponential increase in referrals for transmasculine patients seeking genital affirmation surgery. Despite transgender men’s equal interest in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty, research has primarily focused on phalloplasty. AIM: To summarize and investigate the relati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jolly, Divya, Wu, Catherine A., Boskey, Elizabeth R., Taghinia, Amir H., Diamond, David A., Ganor, Oren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33429241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100294
_version_ 1783660174505934848
author Jolly, Divya
Wu, Catherine A.
Boskey, Elizabeth R.
Taghinia, Amir H.
Diamond, David A.
Ganor, Oren
author_facet Jolly, Divya
Wu, Catherine A.
Boskey, Elizabeth R.
Taghinia, Amir H.
Diamond, David A.
Ganor, Oren
author_sort Jolly, Divya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There has been an exponential increase in referrals for transmasculine patients seeking genital affirmation surgery. Despite transgender men’s equal interest in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty, research has primarily focused on phalloplasty. AIM: To summarize and investigate the relationship between surgical technique, complications, and patient-satisfaction. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical techniques and physician- and patient-reported outcomes of gender-affirming clitoral release and metoidioplasty (PROSPERO# 158722) with literature from PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Data were extracted using PRISMA guidelines. All searches, extractions, and grading were independently completed by 2 authors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main measures were surgical technique, patient satisfaction, voiding, urethral stricture, and urethral fistula. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 7 non-overlapping articles on metoidioplasty were identified, with a total of 403 patients. We identified 4 metoidioplasty techniques: Hage, Belgrade, labial ring flap, and extensive metoidioplasty. All techniques included urethral lengthening. The reported neophallus length ranged from 2 cm to 12 cm, with the smallest neophallus occurring with the labial ring flap technique and extensive metoidioplasty the largest. Across techniques, voiding while standing was reported in most patients, with the lowest rate reported with the labial ring flap (67%). Complications were impacted by surgical technique, with the lowest rates of fistula and stricture occurring with the Belgrade technique. Fistula rates ranged from 5% to 37%, while stricture ranged from 2% to 35% of patients. The Belgrade technique reported significantly lower rates of fistula and stricture (P = .000). The patient-reported outcomes were described for the Belgrade technique and extensive metoidioplasty. Both techniques showed high aesthetic and sexual satisfaction. Transgender individuals can achieve an aesthetically and sexually satisfactory neophallus using a variety of metoidioplasty techniques; however, urethral outcomes vary significantly by technique. The Belgrade technique reported the best outcomes, although data remains limited. Patient priorities should be used to determine surgical technique. Jolly D, Wu CA, Boskey ER, et al. Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Sex Med 2021;9:100294
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7930881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79308812021-03-12 Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes Jolly, Divya Wu, Catherine A. Boskey, Elizabeth R. Taghinia, Amir H. Diamond, David A. Ganor, Oren Sex Med Review INTRODUCTION: There has been an exponential increase in referrals for transmasculine patients seeking genital affirmation surgery. Despite transgender men’s equal interest in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty, research has primarily focused on phalloplasty. AIM: To summarize and investigate the relationship between surgical technique, complications, and patient-satisfaction. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical techniques and physician- and patient-reported outcomes of gender-affirming clitoral release and metoidioplasty (PROSPERO# 158722) with literature from PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Data were extracted using PRISMA guidelines. All searches, extractions, and grading were independently completed by 2 authors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main measures were surgical technique, patient satisfaction, voiding, urethral stricture, and urethral fistula. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 7 non-overlapping articles on metoidioplasty were identified, with a total of 403 patients. We identified 4 metoidioplasty techniques: Hage, Belgrade, labial ring flap, and extensive metoidioplasty. All techniques included urethral lengthening. The reported neophallus length ranged from 2 cm to 12 cm, with the smallest neophallus occurring with the labial ring flap technique and extensive metoidioplasty the largest. Across techniques, voiding while standing was reported in most patients, with the lowest rate reported with the labial ring flap (67%). Complications were impacted by surgical technique, with the lowest rates of fistula and stricture occurring with the Belgrade technique. Fistula rates ranged from 5% to 37%, while stricture ranged from 2% to 35% of patients. The Belgrade technique reported significantly lower rates of fistula and stricture (P = .000). The patient-reported outcomes were described for the Belgrade technique and extensive metoidioplasty. Both techniques showed high aesthetic and sexual satisfaction. Transgender individuals can achieve an aesthetically and sexually satisfactory neophallus using a variety of metoidioplasty techniques; however, urethral outcomes vary significantly by technique. The Belgrade technique reported the best outcomes, although data remains limited. Patient priorities should be used to determine surgical technique. Jolly D, Wu CA, Boskey ER, et al. Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Sex Med 2021;9:100294 Elsevier 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7930881/ /pubmed/33429241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100294 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jolly, Divya
Wu, Catherine A.
Boskey, Elizabeth R.
Taghinia, Amir H.
Diamond, David A.
Ganor, Oren
Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title_full Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title_fullStr Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title_short Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes
title_sort is clitoral release another term for metoidioplasty? a systematic review and meta-analysis of metoidioplasty surgical technique and outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33429241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100294
work_keys_str_mv AT jollydivya isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes
AT wucatherinea isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes
AT boskeyelizabethr isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes
AT taghiniaamirh isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes
AT diamonddavida isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes
AT ganororen isclitoralreleaseanothertermformetoidioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmetoidioplastysurgicaltechniqueandoutcomes