Cargando…

Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study

The aim of this retrospective study was to clinically evaluate the five-year outcomes of implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus, consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes. Medical records of patients with implants placed in combination with crestal sinus lift using sequentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata, Meloni, Silvio Mario, Tallarico, Marco, Melis, Luca, Spano, Giovanni, Baldoni, Edoardo, Koshovari, Alba, Pisano, Milena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010010
_version_ 1783660191050366976
author Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
Meloni, Silvio Mario
Tallarico, Marco
Melis, Luca
Spano, Giovanni
Baldoni, Edoardo
Koshovari, Alba
Pisano, Milena
author_facet Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
Meloni, Silvio Mario
Tallarico, Marco
Melis, Luca
Spano, Giovanni
Baldoni, Edoardo
Koshovari, Alba
Pisano, Milena
author_sort Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
collection PubMed
description The aim of this retrospective study was to clinically evaluate the five-year outcomes of implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus, consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes. Medical records of patients with implants placed in combination with crestal sinus lift using sequential drills and osteotomes, with a residual alveolar bone crest between 4 to 8 mm, and a follow-up of at least five years after final loading, were evaluated. Outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival and success rates, any complication, and marginal bone loss. Data from 96 patients (53 women and 43 men; mean age 54.7 years; range 23–79 years) were collected. A total of 105 single implants were analyzed. After five years of function, two implants were lost and two prostheses failed. No major biological or prosthetic complications occurred. At the five-year examination, the marginal bone loss was 1.24 ± 0.28 mm. Within the limitations of this retrospective study it can be concluded that implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes seem to be a viable option for the treatment of posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7930954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79309542021-03-05 Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata Meloni, Silvio Mario Tallarico, Marco Melis, Luca Spano, Giovanni Baldoni, Edoardo Koshovari, Alba Pisano, Milena J Funct Biomater Article The aim of this retrospective study was to clinically evaluate the five-year outcomes of implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus, consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes. Medical records of patients with implants placed in combination with crestal sinus lift using sequential drills and osteotomes, with a residual alveolar bone crest between 4 to 8 mm, and a follow-up of at least five years after final loading, were evaluated. Outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival and success rates, any complication, and marginal bone loss. Data from 96 patients (53 women and 43 men; mean age 54.7 years; range 23–79 years) were collected. A total of 105 single implants were analyzed. After five years of function, two implants were lost and two prostheses failed. No major biological or prosthetic complications occurred. At the five-year examination, the marginal bone loss was 1.24 ± 0.28 mm. Within the limitations of this retrospective study it can be concluded that implants placed following a combined approach to the sinus consisting of sequential drills and osteotomes seem to be a viable option for the treatment of posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla. MDPI 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7930954/ /pubmed/33557297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010010 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
Meloni, Silvio Mario
Tallarico, Marco
Melis, Luca
Spano, Giovanni
Baldoni, Edoardo
Koshovari, Alba
Pisano, Milena
Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title_full Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title_short Implant Placement Following Crestal Sinus Lift with Sequential Drills and Osteotomes: Five Years after Final Loading Results from a Retrospective Study
title_sort implant placement following crestal sinus lift with sequential drills and osteotomes: five years after final loading results from a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7930954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12010010
work_keys_str_mv AT lumbauaureaimmacolata implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT melonisilviomario implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT tallaricomarco implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT melisluca implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT spanogiovanni implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT baldoniedoardo implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT koshovarialba implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT pisanomilena implantplacementfollowingcrestalsinusliftwithsequentialdrillsandosteotomesfiveyearsafterfinalloadingresultsfromaretrospectivestudy