Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28
The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3(or 4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The production strain of the food enzyme contains...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6431 |
_version_ | 1783660230758891520 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Engel, Karl‐Heinz Jany, Klaus‐Dieter Kärenlampi, Sirpa Marcon, Francesca Penninks, André Smith, Andy Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Engel, Karl‐Heinz Jany, Klaus‐Dieter Kärenlampi, Sirpa Marcon, Francesca Penninks, André Smith, Andy Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3(or 4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The production strain of the food enzyme contains multiple copies of a known antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The food enzyme is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for brewing processes. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids was estimated to be up to 0.183 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 5464. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and two matches were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7931123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79311232021-03-15 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Engel, Karl‐Heinz Jany, Klaus‐Dieter Kärenlampi, Sirpa Marcon, Francesca Penninks, André Smith, Andy Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase (3(or 4)‐β‐d‐glucan 3(4)‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The production strain of the food enzyme contains multiple copies of a known antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The food enzyme is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for brewing processes. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids was estimated to be up to 0.183 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 5464. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and two matches were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7931123/ /pubmed/33727966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6431 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Engel, Karl‐Heinz Jany, Klaus‐Dieter Kärenlampi, Sirpa Marcon, Francesca Penninks, André Smith, Andy Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP‐Ezm28 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,3(4)‐β‐glucanase from the genetically modified bacillus subtilis strain dp‐ezm28 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT janyklausdieter safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT karenlampisirpa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT marconfrancesca safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT penninksandre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT smithandy safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeendo134bglucanasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillussubtilisstraindpezm28 |