Cargando…
“A debriefer must be neutral” and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to identify taken-for-granted beliefs and assumptions about use, costs, and facilitation of post-event debriefing. These myths prevent the ubiquitous uptake of post-event debriefing in clinical units, and therefore the identification of process, teamwork, and l...
Autores principales: | Seelandt, Julia Carolin, Walker, Katie, Kolbe, Michaela |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00161-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A practical guide to virtual debriefings: communities of inquiry perspective
por: Cheng, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns
por: Kolbe, Michaela, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The myth of psychological debriefings during the corona pandemic
por: Van Overmeire, Roel
Publicado: (2020) -
Debriefing in pediatrics
por: Cho, Su Jin
Publicado: (2015) -
Debriefing Gold: Harnessing the Power of Debriefing Data to Inform Education
por: Meshel, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2023)