Cargando…

Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parveen, Rashida, Khakwani, Mehnaz, Naz, Anum, Bhatti, Rabia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679951
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823
_version_ 1783660259333636096
author Parveen, Rashida
Khakwani, Mehnaz
Naz, Anum
Bhatti, Rabia
author_facet Parveen, Rashida
Khakwani, Mehnaz
Naz, Anum
Bhatti, Rabia
author_sort Parveen, Rashida
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. RESULTS: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. CONCLUSION: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7931279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79312792021-03-05 Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System Parveen, Rashida Khakwani, Mehnaz Naz, Anum Bhatti, Rabia Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. RESULTS: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. CONCLUSION: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. Professional Medical Publications 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7931279/ /pubmed/33679951 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parveen, Rashida
Khakwani, Mehnaz
Naz, Anum
Bhatti, Rabia
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title_full Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title_fullStr Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title_short Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System
title_sort analysis of cesarean sections using robson’s ten group classification system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679951
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823
work_keys_str_mv AT parveenrashida analysisofcesareansectionsusingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystem
AT khakwanimehnaz analysisofcesareansectionsusingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystem
AT nazanum analysisofcesareansectionsusingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystem
AT bhattirabia analysisofcesareansectionsusingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystem