Cargando…

Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean operative time (MOT) in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) for ureteric stones. METHODS: This randomized study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from July 2016 to November 2018....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer, Ameen, Mohammad, Murtaza, Badar, Alvi, Muhammad Sarwar, Khan, Zakir, Kiani, Faran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679924
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3049
_version_ 1783660260495458304
author Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer
Ameen, Mohammad
Murtaza, Badar
Alvi, Muhammad Sarwar
Khan, Zakir
Kiani, Faran
author_facet Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer
Ameen, Mohammad
Murtaza, Badar
Alvi, Muhammad Sarwar
Khan, Zakir
Kiani, Faran
author_sort Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean operative time (MOT) in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) for ureteric stones. METHODS: This randomized study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from July 2016 to November 2018. Non probability consecutive sampling technique utilized to enroll 60 patients of both gender aged 18-60 years, having ureteric calculus ≤1.5cm. Randomization was done into group I (LL) and II (PL) via computer generated number tables. Six Consultant Urologists performed surgeries under spinal anesthesia utilizing Swiss Lithoclast(®) Master (EMS(+) S.A. Switzerland) in group II and holmium laser fiber (365μm, 8-10Hz, 9.6-16W, 2100nm wavelength) in group I respectively. MOT was noted from insertion of cystoscope till removal out of meatus. Data obtained was analyzed through IBM SPSS 24.0. RESULTS: Analysis involved 60 patients (30 each group) having similar baseline characteristics (age, gender, laterality, location). There was statistically significant different MOT between LL & PL (25.48±6.99 vs 34.83± 7.47 minutes, p < 0.001). Data stratification with respect to age, gender, laterality and stone location revealed similar trend. Lithotripsy technique significantly affected MOT (p < 0.001) on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ho: YAG LL is an efficient technique when compared with PL in terms of MOT for ureteric stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7931284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79312842021-03-05 Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer Ameen, Mohammad Murtaza, Badar Alvi, Muhammad Sarwar Khan, Zakir Kiani, Faran Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean operative time (MOT) in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) for ureteric stones. METHODS: This randomized study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from July 2016 to November 2018. Non probability consecutive sampling technique utilized to enroll 60 patients of both gender aged 18-60 years, having ureteric calculus ≤1.5cm. Randomization was done into group I (LL) and II (PL) via computer generated number tables. Six Consultant Urologists performed surgeries under spinal anesthesia utilizing Swiss Lithoclast(®) Master (EMS(+) S.A. Switzerland) in group II and holmium laser fiber (365μm, 8-10Hz, 9.6-16W, 2100nm wavelength) in group I respectively. MOT was noted from insertion of cystoscope till removal out of meatus. Data obtained was analyzed through IBM SPSS 24.0. RESULTS: Analysis involved 60 patients (30 each group) having similar baseline characteristics (age, gender, laterality, location). There was statistically significant different MOT between LL & PL (25.48±6.99 vs 34.83± 7.47 minutes, p < 0.001). Data stratification with respect to age, gender, laterality and stone location revealed similar trend. Lithotripsy technique significantly affected MOT (p < 0.001) on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ho: YAG LL is an efficient technique when compared with PL in terms of MOT for ureteric stones. Professional Medical Publications 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7931284/ /pubmed/33679924 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3049 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sajid, Muhammad Tanveer
Ameen, Mohammad
Murtaza, Badar
Alvi, Muhammad Sarwar
Khan, Zakir
Kiani, Faran
Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title_full Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title_fullStr Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title_short Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
title_sort comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing ho: yag laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679924
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3049
work_keys_str_mv AT sajidmuhammadtanveer comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus
AT ameenmohammad comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus
AT murtazabadar comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus
AT alvimuhammadsarwar comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus
AT khanzakir comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus
AT kianifaran comparisonofmeanoperativetimeinpatientsundergoinghoyaglaserlithotripsyandpneumaticlithotripsyinureterorenoscopyforuretericcalculus