Cargando…

Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?

Earlier studies have shown that musically trained individuals may have a benefit in adverse listening situations when compared to non-musicians, especially in speech-on-speech perception. However, the literature provides mostly conflicting results. In the current study, by employing different measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaplan, Elif Canseza, Wagner, Anita E., Toffanin, Paolo, Başkent, Deniz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623787
_version_ 1783660331856297984
author Kaplan, Elif Canseza
Wagner, Anita E.
Toffanin, Paolo
Başkent, Deniz
author_facet Kaplan, Elif Canseza
Wagner, Anita E.
Toffanin, Paolo
Başkent, Deniz
author_sort Kaplan, Elif Canseza
collection PubMed
description Earlier studies have shown that musically trained individuals may have a benefit in adverse listening situations when compared to non-musicians, especially in speech-on-speech perception. However, the literature provides mostly conflicting results. In the current study, by employing different measures of spoken language processing, we aimed to test whether we could capture potential differences between musicians and non-musicians in speech-on-speech processing. We used an offline measure of speech perception (sentence recall task), which reveals a post-task response, and online measures of real time spoken language processing: gaze-tracking and pupillometry. We used stimuli of comparable complexity across both paradigms and tested the same groups of participants. In the sentence recall task, musicians recalled more words correctly than non-musicians. In the eye-tracking experiment, both groups showed reduced fixations to the target and competitor words’ images as the level of speech maskers increased. The time course of gaze fixations to the competitor did not differ between groups in the speech-in-quiet condition, while the time course dynamics did differ between groups as the two-talker masker was added to the target signal. As the level of two-talker masker increased, musicians showed reduced lexical competition as indicated by the gaze fixations to the competitor. The pupil dilation data showed differences mainly in one target-to-masker ratio. This does not allow to draw conclusions regarding potential differences in the use of cognitive resources between groups. Overall, the eye-tracking measure enabled us to observe that musicians may be using a different strategy than non-musicians to attain spoken word recognition as the noise level increased. However, further investigation with more fine-grained alignment between the processes captured by online and offline measures is necessary to establish whether musicians differ due to better cognitive control or sound processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7931613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79316132021-03-05 Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing? Kaplan, Elif Canseza Wagner, Anita E. Toffanin, Paolo Başkent, Deniz Front Psychol Psychology Earlier studies have shown that musically trained individuals may have a benefit in adverse listening situations when compared to non-musicians, especially in speech-on-speech perception. However, the literature provides mostly conflicting results. In the current study, by employing different measures of spoken language processing, we aimed to test whether we could capture potential differences between musicians and non-musicians in speech-on-speech processing. We used an offline measure of speech perception (sentence recall task), which reveals a post-task response, and online measures of real time spoken language processing: gaze-tracking and pupillometry. We used stimuli of comparable complexity across both paradigms and tested the same groups of participants. In the sentence recall task, musicians recalled more words correctly than non-musicians. In the eye-tracking experiment, both groups showed reduced fixations to the target and competitor words’ images as the level of speech maskers increased. The time course of gaze fixations to the competitor did not differ between groups in the speech-in-quiet condition, while the time course dynamics did differ between groups as the two-talker masker was added to the target signal. As the level of two-talker masker increased, musicians showed reduced lexical competition as indicated by the gaze fixations to the competitor. The pupil dilation data showed differences mainly in one target-to-masker ratio. This does not allow to draw conclusions regarding potential differences in the use of cognitive resources between groups. Overall, the eye-tracking measure enabled us to observe that musicians may be using a different strategy than non-musicians to attain spoken word recognition as the noise level increased. However, further investigation with more fine-grained alignment between the processes captured by online and offline measures is necessary to establish whether musicians differ due to better cognitive control or sound processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7931613/ /pubmed/33679539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623787 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kaplan, Wagner, Toffanin and Başkent. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kaplan, Elif Canseza
Wagner, Anita E.
Toffanin, Paolo
Başkent, Deniz
Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title_full Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title_fullStr Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title_full_unstemmed Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title_short Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
title_sort do musicians and non-musicians differ in speech-on-speech processing?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623787
work_keys_str_mv AT kaplanelifcanseza domusiciansandnonmusiciansdifferinspeechonspeechprocessing
AT wagneranitae domusiciansandnonmusiciansdifferinspeechonspeechprocessing
AT toffaninpaolo domusiciansandnonmusiciansdifferinspeechonspeechprocessing
AT baskentdeniz domusiciansandnonmusiciansdifferinspeechonspeechprocessing