Cargando…

A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies

Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kuansan, Shen, Zhihong, Huang, Chiyuan, Wu, Chieh-Han, Eide, Darrin, Dong, Yuxiao, Qian, Junjie, Kanakia, Anshul, Chen, Alvin, Rogahn, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693368
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045
_version_ 1783660389731401728
author Wang, Kuansan
Shen, Zhihong
Huang, Chiyuan
Wu, Chieh-Han
Eide, Darrin
Dong, Yuxiao
Qian, Junjie
Kanakia, Anshul
Chen, Alvin
Rogahn, Richard
author_facet Wang, Kuansan
Shen, Zhihong
Huang, Chiyuan
Wu, Chieh-Han
Eide, Darrin
Dong, Yuxiao
Qian, Junjie
Kanakia, Anshul
Chen, Alvin
Rogahn, Richard
author_sort Wang, Kuansan
collection PubMed
description Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed openly. The sheer amount of information available is overwhelming for individual humans to keep up and digest. In the meantime, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have made great strides and the cost of computing has plummeted to the extent that it has become practical to employ intelligent agents to comprehensively collect and analyze scholarly communications. MAS is one such effort and this paper describes its recent progresses since the last disclosure. As there are plenty of independent studies affirming the effectiveness of MAS, this paper focuses on the use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage: (1) natural language understanding in extracting factoids from individual articles at the web scale, (2) knowledge assisted inference and reasoning in assembling the factoids into a knowledge graph, and (3) a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS. These elements enhance the capabilities of MAS in supporting the studies of science of science based on the GOTO principle, i.e., good and open data with transparent and objective methodologies. The current direction of development and how to access the regularly updated data and tools from MAS, including the knowledge graph, a REST API and a website, are also described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7931949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79319492021-03-09 A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies Wang, Kuansan Shen, Zhihong Huang, Chiyuan Wu, Chieh-Han Eide, Darrin Dong, Yuxiao Qian, Junjie Kanakia, Anshul Chen, Alvin Rogahn, Richard Front Big Data Big Data Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed openly. The sheer amount of information available is overwhelming for individual humans to keep up and digest. In the meantime, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have made great strides and the cost of computing has plummeted to the extent that it has become practical to employ intelligent agents to comprehensively collect and analyze scholarly communications. MAS is one such effort and this paper describes its recent progresses since the last disclosure. As there are plenty of independent studies affirming the effectiveness of MAS, this paper focuses on the use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage: (1) natural language understanding in extracting factoids from individual articles at the web scale, (2) knowledge assisted inference and reasoning in assembling the factoids into a knowledge graph, and (3) a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS. These elements enhance the capabilities of MAS in supporting the studies of science of science based on the GOTO principle, i.e., good and open data with transparent and objective methodologies. The current direction of development and how to access the regularly updated data and tools from MAS, including the knowledge graph, a REST API and a website, are also described. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7931949/ /pubmed/33693368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wang, Shen, Huang, Wu, Eide, Dong, Qian, Kanakia, Chen and Rogahn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Big Data
Wang, Kuansan
Shen, Zhihong
Huang, Chiyuan
Wu, Chieh-Han
Eide, Darrin
Dong, Yuxiao
Qian, Junjie
Kanakia, Anshul
Chen, Alvin
Rogahn, Richard
A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title_full A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title_fullStr A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title_short A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
title_sort review of microsoft academic services for science of science studies
topic Big Data
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693368
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkuansan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT shenzhihong areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT huangchiyuan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT wuchiehhan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT eidedarrin areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT dongyuxiao areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT qianjunjie areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT kanakiaanshul areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT chenalvin areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT rogahnrichard areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT wangkuansan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT shenzhihong reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT huangchiyuan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT wuchiehhan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT eidedarrin reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT dongyuxiao reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT qianjunjie reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT kanakiaanshul reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT chenalvin reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies
AT rogahnrichard reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies