Cargando…
A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045 |
_version_ | 1783660389731401728 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Kuansan Shen, Zhihong Huang, Chiyuan Wu, Chieh-Han Eide, Darrin Dong, Yuxiao Qian, Junjie Kanakia, Anshul Chen, Alvin Rogahn, Richard |
author_facet | Wang, Kuansan Shen, Zhihong Huang, Chiyuan Wu, Chieh-Han Eide, Darrin Dong, Yuxiao Qian, Junjie Kanakia, Anshul Chen, Alvin Rogahn, Richard |
author_sort | Wang, Kuansan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed openly. The sheer amount of information available is overwhelming for individual humans to keep up and digest. In the meantime, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have made great strides and the cost of computing has plummeted to the extent that it has become practical to employ intelligent agents to comprehensively collect and analyze scholarly communications. MAS is one such effort and this paper describes its recent progresses since the last disclosure. As there are plenty of independent studies affirming the effectiveness of MAS, this paper focuses on the use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage: (1) natural language understanding in extracting factoids from individual articles at the web scale, (2) knowledge assisted inference and reasoning in assembling the factoids into a knowledge graph, and (3) a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS. These elements enhance the capabilities of MAS in supporting the studies of science of science based on the GOTO principle, i.e., good and open data with transparent and objective methodologies. The current direction of development and how to access the regularly updated data and tools from MAS, including the knowledge graph, a REST API and a website, are also described. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7931949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79319492021-03-09 A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies Wang, Kuansan Shen, Zhihong Huang, Chiyuan Wu, Chieh-Han Eide, Darrin Dong, Yuxiao Qian, Junjie Kanakia, Anshul Chen, Alvin Rogahn, Richard Front Big Data Big Data Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed openly. The sheer amount of information available is overwhelming for individual humans to keep up and digest. In the meantime, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have made great strides and the cost of computing has plummeted to the extent that it has become practical to employ intelligent agents to comprehensively collect and analyze scholarly communications. MAS is one such effort and this paper describes its recent progresses since the last disclosure. As there are plenty of independent studies affirming the effectiveness of MAS, this paper focuses on the use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage: (1) natural language understanding in extracting factoids from individual articles at the web scale, (2) knowledge assisted inference and reasoning in assembling the factoids into a knowledge graph, and (3) a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS. These elements enhance the capabilities of MAS in supporting the studies of science of science based on the GOTO principle, i.e., good and open data with transparent and objective methodologies. The current direction of development and how to access the regularly updated data and tools from MAS, including the knowledge graph, a REST API and a website, are also described. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7931949/ /pubmed/33693368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wang, Shen, Huang, Wu, Eide, Dong, Qian, Kanakia, Chen and Rogahn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Big Data Wang, Kuansan Shen, Zhihong Huang, Chiyuan Wu, Chieh-Han Eide, Darrin Dong, Yuxiao Qian, Junjie Kanakia, Anshul Chen, Alvin Rogahn, Richard A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title | A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title_full | A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title_fullStr | A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title_short | A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies |
title_sort | review of microsoft academic services for science of science studies |
topic | Big Data |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangkuansan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT shenzhihong areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT huangchiyuan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT wuchiehhan areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT eidedarrin areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT dongyuxiao areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT qianjunjie areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT kanakiaanshul areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT chenalvin areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT rogahnrichard areviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT wangkuansan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT shenzhihong reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT huangchiyuan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT wuchiehhan reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT eidedarrin reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT dongyuxiao reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT qianjunjie reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT kanakiaanshul reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT chenalvin reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies AT rogahnrichard reviewofmicrosoftacademicservicesforscienceofsciencestudies |