Cargando…
Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017 |
_version_ | 1783660393787293696 |
---|---|
author | Bermudez, Ivan Cleven, Daniel Gera, Ralucca Kiser, Erik T. Newlin, Timothy Saxena, Akrati |
author_facet | Bermudez, Ivan Cleven, Daniel Gera, Ralucca Kiser, Erik T. Newlin, Timothy Saxena, Akrati |
author_sort | Bermudez, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active shooter event at a Munich shopping mall in July 2016? To answer that question in this work, we capture tweets utilizing #Munich beginning 1 h after the shooting was reported, and the data collection ends approximately 1 month later. We construct both daily networks and a cumulative network from this data. We analyze community evolution using the standard Louvain algorithm, and how the communities change over time to study how they both encourage and discourage the effectiveness of an information messaging campaign. We conclude that the large communities observed in the early stage of the data disappear from the #Munich conversation within 7 days. The politically charged nature of many of these communities suggests their activity is migrated to other Twitter hashtags (i.e., conversation topics). Future analysis of Twitter activity might focus on tracking communities across topics and time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7931967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79319672021-03-09 Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence Bermudez, Ivan Cleven, Daniel Gera, Ralucca Kiser, Erik T. Newlin, Timothy Saxena, Akrati Front Big Data Big Data Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active shooter event at a Munich shopping mall in July 2016? To answer that question in this work, we capture tweets utilizing #Munich beginning 1 h after the shooting was reported, and the data collection ends approximately 1 month later. We construct both daily networks and a cumulative network from this data. We analyze community evolution using the standard Louvain algorithm, and how the communities change over time to study how they both encourage and discourage the effectiveness of an information messaging campaign. We conclude that the large communities observed in the early stage of the data disappear from the #Munich conversation within 7 days. The politically charged nature of many of these communities suggests their activity is migrated to other Twitter hashtags (i.e., conversation topics). Future analysis of Twitter activity might focus on tracking communities across topics and time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7931967/ /pubmed/33693340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bermudez, Cleven, Gera, Kiser, Newlin and Saxena. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Big Data Bermudez, Ivan Cleven, Daniel Gera, Ralucca Kiser, Erik T. Newlin, Timothy Saxena, Akrati Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title | Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title_full | Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title_fullStr | Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title_full_unstemmed | Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title_short | Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence |
title_sort | twitter response to munich july 2016 attack: network analysis of influence |
topic | Big Data |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bermudezivan twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence AT clevendaniel twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence AT geraralucca twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence AT kisererikt twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence AT newlintimothy twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence AT saxenaakrati twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence |