Cargando…

Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence

Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bermudez, Ivan, Cleven, Daniel, Gera, Ralucca, Kiser, Erik T., Newlin, Timothy, Saxena, Akrati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693340
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017
_version_ 1783660393787293696
author Bermudez, Ivan
Cleven, Daniel
Gera, Ralucca
Kiser, Erik T.
Newlin, Timothy
Saxena, Akrati
author_facet Bermudez, Ivan
Cleven, Daniel
Gera, Ralucca
Kiser, Erik T.
Newlin, Timothy
Saxena, Akrati
author_sort Bermudez, Ivan
collection PubMed
description Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active shooter event at a Munich shopping mall in July 2016? To answer that question in this work, we capture tweets utilizing #Munich beginning 1 h after the shooting was reported, and the data collection ends approximately 1 month later. We construct both daily networks and a cumulative network from this data. We analyze community evolution using the standard Louvain algorithm, and how the communities change over time to study how they both encourage and discourage the effectiveness of an information messaging campaign. We conclude that the large communities observed in the early stage of the data disappear from the #Munich conversation within 7 days. The politically charged nature of many of these communities suggests their activity is migrated to other Twitter hashtags (i.e., conversation topics). Future analysis of Twitter activity might focus on tracking communities across topics and time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7931967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79319672021-03-09 Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence Bermudez, Ivan Cleven, Daniel Gera, Ralucca Kiser, Erik T. Newlin, Timothy Saxena, Akrati Front Big Data Big Data Social Media platforms in Cyberspace provide communication channels for individuals, businesses, as well as state and non-state actors (i.e., individuals and groups) to conduct messaging campaigns. What are the spheres of influence that arose around the keyword #Munich on Twitter following an active shooter event at a Munich shopping mall in July 2016? To answer that question in this work, we capture tweets utilizing #Munich beginning 1 h after the shooting was reported, and the data collection ends approximately 1 month later. We construct both daily networks and a cumulative network from this data. We analyze community evolution using the standard Louvain algorithm, and how the communities change over time to study how they both encourage and discourage the effectiveness of an information messaging campaign. We conclude that the large communities observed in the early stage of the data disappear from the #Munich conversation within 7 days. The politically charged nature of many of these communities suggests their activity is migrated to other Twitter hashtags (i.e., conversation topics). Future analysis of Twitter activity might focus on tracking communities across topics and time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7931967/ /pubmed/33693340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bermudez, Cleven, Gera, Kiser, Newlin and Saxena. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Big Data
Bermudez, Ivan
Cleven, Daniel
Gera, Ralucca
Kiser, Erik T.
Newlin, Timothy
Saxena, Akrati
Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title_full Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title_fullStr Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title_full_unstemmed Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title_short Twitter Response to Munich July 2016 Attack: Network Analysis of Influence
title_sort twitter response to munich july 2016 attack: network analysis of influence
topic Big Data
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7931967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693340
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00017
work_keys_str_mv AT bermudezivan twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence
AT clevendaniel twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence
AT geraralucca twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence
AT kisererikt twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence
AT newlintimothy twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence
AT saxenaakrati twitterresponsetomunichjuly2016attacknetworkanalysisofinfluence