Cargando…
Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646 |
_version_ | 1783660405322678272 |
---|---|
author | Fuchs, Andre Tufa, Tafese Beyene Hörner, Johannes Hurissa, Zewdu Nordmann, Tamara Bosselmann, Matthias Abdissa, Sileshi Sorsa, Abebe Orth, Hans Martin Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole MacKenzie, Colin Pfeffer, Klaus Kaasch, Achim J. Bode, Johannes G. Häussinger, Dieter Feldt, Torsten |
author_facet | Fuchs, Andre Tufa, Tafese Beyene Hörner, Johannes Hurissa, Zewdu Nordmann, Tamara Bosselmann, Matthias Abdissa, Sileshi Sorsa, Abebe Orth, Hans Martin Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole MacKenzie, Colin Pfeffer, Klaus Kaasch, Achim J. Bode, Johannes G. Häussinger, Dieter Feldt, Torsten |
author_sort | Fuchs, Andre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian tertiary hospital and evaluated recommended sepsis scores. METHODS: Patients with an infection and ≥2 SIRS criteria were screened for sepsis by SOFA scoring. From septic patients, socioeconomic and clinical data as well as blood cultures were collected and they were followed until discharge or death; 28-day mortality was determined. RESULTS: In 170 patients with sepsis, the overall mortality rate was 29.4%. The recognition rate by treating physicians after initial clinical assessment was low (12.4%). Increased risk of mortality was significantly associated with level of SOFA and qSOFA score, Gram-negative bacteremia (in comparison to Gram-positive bacteremia; 42.9 versus 16.7%), and antimicrobial regimen including ceftriaxone (35.7% versus 19.2%) or metronidazole (43.8% versus 25.0%), but not with an increased respiratory rate (≥22/min) or decreased systolic blood pressure (≤100mmHg). In Gram-negative isolates, extended antimicrobial resistance with expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase genes was common. Among adult patients, sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA score for detection of sepsis were 54.3% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is commonly unrecognized and associated with high mortality, showing the need for reliable and easy-applicable tools to support early recognition. The established sepsis scores were either of limited applicability (SOFA) or, as in the case of qSOFA, were significantly impaired in their sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating the need for further evaluation and adaptation to local settings. Regional factors like malaria endemicity and HIV prevalence might influence the performance of different scores. Ineffective empirical treatment due to antimicrobial resistance is common and associated with mortality. Local antimicrobial resistance statistics are needed for guidance of calculated antimicrobial therapy to support reduction of sepsis mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7932074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79320742021-03-10 Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores Fuchs, Andre Tufa, Tafese Beyene Hörner, Johannes Hurissa, Zewdu Nordmann, Tamara Bosselmann, Matthias Abdissa, Sileshi Sorsa, Abebe Orth, Hans Martin Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole MacKenzie, Colin Pfeffer, Klaus Kaasch, Achim J. Bode, Johannes G. Häussinger, Dieter Feldt, Torsten PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian tertiary hospital and evaluated recommended sepsis scores. METHODS: Patients with an infection and ≥2 SIRS criteria were screened for sepsis by SOFA scoring. From septic patients, socioeconomic and clinical data as well as blood cultures were collected and they were followed until discharge or death; 28-day mortality was determined. RESULTS: In 170 patients with sepsis, the overall mortality rate was 29.4%. The recognition rate by treating physicians after initial clinical assessment was low (12.4%). Increased risk of mortality was significantly associated with level of SOFA and qSOFA score, Gram-negative bacteremia (in comparison to Gram-positive bacteremia; 42.9 versus 16.7%), and antimicrobial regimen including ceftriaxone (35.7% versus 19.2%) or metronidazole (43.8% versus 25.0%), but not with an increased respiratory rate (≥22/min) or decreased systolic blood pressure (≤100mmHg). In Gram-negative isolates, extended antimicrobial resistance with expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase genes was common. Among adult patients, sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA score for detection of sepsis were 54.3% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is commonly unrecognized and associated with high mortality, showing the need for reliable and easy-applicable tools to support early recognition. The established sepsis scores were either of limited applicability (SOFA) or, as in the case of qSOFA, were significantly impaired in their sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating the need for further evaluation and adaptation to local settings. Regional factors like malaria endemicity and HIV prevalence might influence the performance of different scores. Ineffective empirical treatment due to antimicrobial resistance is common and associated with mortality. Local antimicrobial resistance statistics are needed for guidance of calculated antimicrobial therapy to support reduction of sepsis mortality. Public Library of Science 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7932074/ /pubmed/33661970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646 Text en © 2021 Fuchs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fuchs, Andre Tufa, Tafese Beyene Hörner, Johannes Hurissa, Zewdu Nordmann, Tamara Bosselmann, Matthias Abdissa, Sileshi Sorsa, Abebe Orth, Hans Martin Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole MacKenzie, Colin Pfeffer, Klaus Kaasch, Achim J. Bode, Johannes G. Häussinger, Dieter Feldt, Torsten Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title | Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title_full | Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title_fullStr | Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title_short | Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
title_sort | clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuchsandre clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT tufatafesebeyene clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT hornerjohannes clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT hurissazewdu clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT nordmanntamara clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT bosselmannmatthias clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT abdissasileshi clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT sorsaabebe clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT orthhansmartin clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT jensenbjornerikole clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT mackenziecolin clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT pfefferklaus clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT kaaschachimj clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT bodejohannesg clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT haussingerdieter clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores AT feldttorsten clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores |