Cargando…

Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores

BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuchs, Andre, Tufa, Tafese Beyene, Hörner, Johannes, Hurissa, Zewdu, Nordmann, Tamara, Bosselmann, Matthias, Abdissa, Sileshi, Sorsa, Abebe, Orth, Hans Martin, Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole, MacKenzie, Colin, Pfeffer, Klaus, Kaasch, Achim J., Bode, Johannes G., Häussinger, Dieter, Feldt, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646
_version_ 1783660405322678272
author Fuchs, Andre
Tufa, Tafese Beyene
Hörner, Johannes
Hurissa, Zewdu
Nordmann, Tamara
Bosselmann, Matthias
Abdissa, Sileshi
Sorsa, Abebe
Orth, Hans Martin
Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole
MacKenzie, Colin
Pfeffer, Klaus
Kaasch, Achim J.
Bode, Johannes G.
Häussinger, Dieter
Feldt, Torsten
author_facet Fuchs, Andre
Tufa, Tafese Beyene
Hörner, Johannes
Hurissa, Zewdu
Nordmann, Tamara
Bosselmann, Matthias
Abdissa, Sileshi
Sorsa, Abebe
Orth, Hans Martin
Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole
MacKenzie, Colin
Pfeffer, Klaus
Kaasch, Achim J.
Bode, Johannes G.
Häussinger, Dieter
Feldt, Torsten
author_sort Fuchs, Andre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian tertiary hospital and evaluated recommended sepsis scores. METHODS: Patients with an infection and ≥2 SIRS criteria were screened for sepsis by SOFA scoring. From septic patients, socioeconomic and clinical data as well as blood cultures were collected and they were followed until discharge or death; 28-day mortality was determined. RESULTS: In 170 patients with sepsis, the overall mortality rate was 29.4%. The recognition rate by treating physicians after initial clinical assessment was low (12.4%). Increased risk of mortality was significantly associated with level of SOFA and qSOFA score, Gram-negative bacteremia (in comparison to Gram-positive bacteremia; 42.9 versus 16.7%), and antimicrobial regimen including ceftriaxone (35.7% versus 19.2%) or metronidazole (43.8% versus 25.0%), but not with an increased respiratory rate (≥22/min) or decreased systolic blood pressure (≤100mmHg). In Gram-negative isolates, extended antimicrobial resistance with expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase genes was common. Among adult patients, sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA score for detection of sepsis were 54.3% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is commonly unrecognized and associated with high mortality, showing the need for reliable and easy-applicable tools to support early recognition. The established sepsis scores were either of limited applicability (SOFA) or, as in the case of qSOFA, were significantly impaired in their sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating the need for further evaluation and adaptation to local settings. Regional factors like malaria endemicity and HIV prevalence might influence the performance of different scores. Ineffective empirical treatment due to antimicrobial resistance is common and associated with mortality. Local antimicrobial resistance statistics are needed for guidance of calculated antimicrobial therapy to support reduction of sepsis mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7932074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79320742021-03-10 Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores Fuchs, Andre Tufa, Tafese Beyene Hörner, Johannes Hurissa, Zewdu Nordmann, Tamara Bosselmann, Matthias Abdissa, Sileshi Sorsa, Abebe Orth, Hans Martin Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole MacKenzie, Colin Pfeffer, Klaus Kaasch, Achim J. Bode, Johannes G. Häussinger, Dieter Feldt, Torsten PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the necessity of early recognition for an optimal outcome, sepsis often remains unrecognized. Available tools for early recognition are rarely evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we analyzed the spectrum, treatment and outcome of sepsis at an Ethiopian tertiary hospital and evaluated recommended sepsis scores. METHODS: Patients with an infection and ≥2 SIRS criteria were screened for sepsis by SOFA scoring. From septic patients, socioeconomic and clinical data as well as blood cultures were collected and they were followed until discharge or death; 28-day mortality was determined. RESULTS: In 170 patients with sepsis, the overall mortality rate was 29.4%. The recognition rate by treating physicians after initial clinical assessment was low (12.4%). Increased risk of mortality was significantly associated with level of SOFA and qSOFA score, Gram-negative bacteremia (in comparison to Gram-positive bacteremia; 42.9 versus 16.7%), and antimicrobial regimen including ceftriaxone (35.7% versus 19.2%) or metronidazole (43.8% versus 25.0%), but not with an increased respiratory rate (≥22/min) or decreased systolic blood pressure (≤100mmHg). In Gram-negative isolates, extended antimicrobial resistance with expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase genes was common. Among adult patients, sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA score for detection of sepsis were 54.3% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sepsis is commonly unrecognized and associated with high mortality, showing the need for reliable and easy-applicable tools to support early recognition. The established sepsis scores were either of limited applicability (SOFA) or, as in the case of qSOFA, were significantly impaired in their sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating the need for further evaluation and adaptation to local settings. Regional factors like malaria endemicity and HIV prevalence might influence the performance of different scores. Ineffective empirical treatment due to antimicrobial resistance is common and associated with mortality. Local antimicrobial resistance statistics are needed for guidance of calculated antimicrobial therapy to support reduction of sepsis mortality. Public Library of Science 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7932074/ /pubmed/33661970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646 Text en © 2021 Fuchs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fuchs, Andre
Tufa, Tafese Beyene
Hörner, Johannes
Hurissa, Zewdu
Nordmann, Tamara
Bosselmann, Matthias
Abdissa, Sileshi
Sorsa, Abebe
Orth, Hans Martin
Jensen, Björn-Erik Ole
MacKenzie, Colin
Pfeffer, Klaus
Kaasch, Achim J.
Bode, Johannes G.
Häussinger, Dieter
Feldt, Torsten
Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title_full Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title_fullStr Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title_short Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
title_sort clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247646
work_keys_str_mv AT fuchsandre clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT tufatafesebeyene clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT hornerjohannes clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT hurissazewdu clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT nordmanntamara clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT bosselmannmatthias clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT abdissasileshi clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT sorsaabebe clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT orthhansmartin clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT jensenbjornerikole clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT mackenziecolin clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT pfefferklaus clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT kaaschachimj clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT bodejohannesg clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT haussingerdieter clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores
AT feldttorsten clinicalandmicrobiologicalcharacterizationofsepsisandevaluationofsepsisscores