Cargando…
Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease
BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn’s disease suffer from a higher rate of anastomotic leakages after ileocecal resection than patients without Crohn’s disease. Our hypothesis was that microscopic inflammation at the resection margins of ileocecal resections in Crohn’s disease increases the rate of anas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247796 |
_version_ | 1783660425571729408 |
---|---|
author | Schineis, Christian Ullrich, Andrea Lehmann, Kai S. Holmer, Christoph Lauscher, Johannes C. Weixler, Benjamin Kreis, Martin E. Seifarth, Claudia |
author_facet | Schineis, Christian Ullrich, Andrea Lehmann, Kai S. Holmer, Christoph Lauscher, Johannes C. Weixler, Benjamin Kreis, Martin E. Seifarth, Claudia |
author_sort | Schineis, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn’s disease suffer from a higher rate of anastomotic leakages after ileocecal resection than patients without Crohn’s disease. Our hypothesis was that microscopic inflammation at the resection margins of ileocecal resections in Crohn’s disease increases the rate of anastomotic leakages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 130 patients with Crohn’s disease that underwent ileocecal resection between 2015 and 2019, were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage was the primary outcome parameter. Inflammation at the resection margin was characterized as “inflammation at proximal resection margin”, “inflammation at distal resection margin” or “inflammation at both ends”. RESULTS: 46 patients (35.4%) showed microscopic inflammation at the resection margins. 17 patients (13.1%) developed anastomotic leakage. No difference in the rate of anastomotic leakages was found for proximally affected resection margins (no anastomotic leakage vs. anastomotic leakage: 20.3 vs. 35.3%, p = 0.17), distally affected resection margins (2.7 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.47) or inflammation at both ends (9.7 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.80). No effect on the anastomotic leakage rate was found for preoperative hemoglobin concentration (no anastomotic leakage vs. anastomotic leakage: 12.3 vs. 13.5 g/dl, p = 0.26), perioperative immunosuppressive medication (62.8 vs. 52.9%, p = 0.30), BMI (21.8 vs. 22.4 m(2)/kg, p = 0.82), emergency operation (21.2 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.29), laparoscopic vs. open procedure (p = 0.58), diverting ileostomy (31.9 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.35) or the level of surgical training (staff surgeon: 80.5 vs. 76.5%, p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Microscopic inflammation at the resection margins after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease is common. Histologically inflamed resection margins do not appear to affect the rate of anastomotic leakages. Our data suggest that there is no need for extensive resections or frozen section to achieve microscopically inflammation-free resection margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7932166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79321662021-03-15 Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease Schineis, Christian Ullrich, Andrea Lehmann, Kai S. Holmer, Christoph Lauscher, Johannes C. Weixler, Benjamin Kreis, Martin E. Seifarth, Claudia PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn’s disease suffer from a higher rate of anastomotic leakages after ileocecal resection than patients without Crohn’s disease. Our hypothesis was that microscopic inflammation at the resection margins of ileocecal resections in Crohn’s disease increases the rate of anastomotic leakages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 130 patients with Crohn’s disease that underwent ileocecal resection between 2015 and 2019, were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage was the primary outcome parameter. Inflammation at the resection margin was characterized as “inflammation at proximal resection margin”, “inflammation at distal resection margin” or “inflammation at both ends”. RESULTS: 46 patients (35.4%) showed microscopic inflammation at the resection margins. 17 patients (13.1%) developed anastomotic leakage. No difference in the rate of anastomotic leakages was found for proximally affected resection margins (no anastomotic leakage vs. anastomotic leakage: 20.3 vs. 35.3%, p = 0.17), distally affected resection margins (2.7 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.47) or inflammation at both ends (9.7 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.80). No effect on the anastomotic leakage rate was found for preoperative hemoglobin concentration (no anastomotic leakage vs. anastomotic leakage: 12.3 vs. 13.5 g/dl, p = 0.26), perioperative immunosuppressive medication (62.8 vs. 52.9%, p = 0.30), BMI (21.8 vs. 22.4 m(2)/kg, p = 0.82), emergency operation (21.2 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.29), laparoscopic vs. open procedure (p = 0.58), diverting ileostomy (31.9 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.35) or the level of surgical training (staff surgeon: 80.5 vs. 76.5%, p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Microscopic inflammation at the resection margins after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease is common. Histologically inflamed resection margins do not appear to affect the rate of anastomotic leakages. Our data suggest that there is no need for extensive resections or frozen section to achieve microscopically inflammation-free resection margins. Public Library of Science 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7932166/ /pubmed/33661983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247796 Text en © 2021 Schineis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schineis, Christian Ullrich, Andrea Lehmann, Kai S. Holmer, Christoph Lauscher, Johannes C. Weixler, Benjamin Kreis, Martin E. Seifarth, Claudia Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title | Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title_full | Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title_fullStr | Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title_short | Microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease |
title_sort | microscopic inflammation in ileocecal specimen does not correspond to a higher anastomotic leakage rate after ileocecal resection in crohn’s disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schineischristian microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT ullrichandrea microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT lehmannkais microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT holmerchristoph microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT lauscherjohannesc microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT weixlerbenjamin microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT kreismartine microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease AT seifarthclaudia microscopicinflammationinileocecalspecimendoesnotcorrespondtoahigheranastomoticleakagerateafterileocecalresectionincrohnsdisease |