Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Atrial Fibrillation by Built-in Electrocardiogram Technology in a Blood Pressure Monitor

Background: Hypertension in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a known independent risk factor for stroke. The Complete blood pressure (BP) monitor (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) was developed as the first BP monitor with electrocardiogram (ECG) capability in a single device to simultaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senoo, Keitaro, Miki, Tomonori, Okura, Takashi, Shiraishi, Hirokazu, Shirayama, Takeshi, Inoue, Keiji, Sakatani, Tomohiko, Kakita, Ken, Hattori, Tetsuhisa, Nakai, Kentaro, Ikeda, Takanori, Matoba, Satoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Circulation Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0032
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Hypertension in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a known independent risk factor for stroke. The Complete blood pressure (BP) monitor (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) was developed as the first BP monitor with electrocardiogram (ECG) capability in a single device to simultaneously monitor ECG and BP readings. This study investigated whether the Complete can accurately differentiate sinus rhythm (SR) from AF during BP measurement. Methods and Results: Fifty-six consecutive patients with persistent AF admitted for catheter ablation were enrolled in the study (mean age 65.8 years; 83.9% male). In all patients, 12-lead ECGs and simultaneous Complete recordings were acquired before and after ablation. The Complete interpretations were compared with physician-reviewed ECGs, whereas Complete recordings were reviewed by cardiologists in a blinded manner and compared with ECG interpretations. Sensitivity, specificity, and κ coefficient were also determined. In all, 164 Complete and ECG recordings were simultaneously acquired from the 56 patients. After excluding unclassified recordings, the Complete automated algorithm performed well, with 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and a κ coefficient of 0.87 compared with physician-interpreted ECGs. Physician-interpreted Complete recordings performed well, with 99% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and a κ coefficient of 0.85 compared with physician-interpreted ECGs. Conclusions: The Complete, which combines BP and ECG monitoring, can accurately differentiate SR from AF during BP measurement.