Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―

Background: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for the management of hypertension in Japan; however, comparative efficacy data within the ARB drug class remain limited. Methods and Results: This systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) indexed i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakajima, Tadashi, Oh, Akinori, Saita, Shun, Yoshida, Takuo, Ohishi, Mitsuru, Nishigaki, Nobuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Circulation Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076
_version_ 1783660493796278272
author Nakajima, Tadashi
Oh, Akinori
Saita, Shun
Yoshida, Takuo
Ohishi, Mitsuru
Nishigaki, Nobuhiro
author_facet Nakajima, Tadashi
Oh, Akinori
Saita, Shun
Yoshida, Takuo
Ohishi, Mitsuru
Nishigaki, Nobuhiro
author_sort Nakajima, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description Background: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for the management of hypertension in Japan; however, comparative efficacy data within the ARB drug class remain limited. Methods and Results: This systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) indexed in PubMed and Ichushi in Japanese patients with hypertension receiving ARB monotherapy (azilsartan, candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, valsartan) in at least 1 arm. Of 763 RCTs identified, 77 met the eligibility criteria; of which, 37 reported mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline in the office setting and were used to construct the network. A fixed-effects model (FEM) showed the effect of each drug vs. the reference, azilsartan. Using the FEM, the mean (95% credible interval) change from baseline in SBP/DBP for candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, and valsartan was 3.8 (2.9–4.8)/2.6 (2.0–3.1), 4.8 (2.0–7.5)/3.7 (1.8–5.6), 3.0 (0.8–5.1)/1.9 (0.5–3.3), 3.2 (1.2–5.1)/2.7 (1.3–4.1), 3.2 (0.8–5.6)/2.0 (0.3–3.6), and 3.1 (1.1–5.1)/2.4 (1.1–3.8) mmHg, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence that azilsartan has a more favorable efficacy profile than the other ARBs in reducing SBP and DBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7932820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Circulation Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79328202021-03-09 Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ― Nakajima, Tadashi Oh, Akinori Saita, Shun Yoshida, Takuo Ohishi, Mitsuru Nishigaki, Nobuhiro Circ Rep Original article Background: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for the management of hypertension in Japan; however, comparative efficacy data within the ARB drug class remain limited. Methods and Results: This systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) indexed in PubMed and Ichushi in Japanese patients with hypertension receiving ARB monotherapy (azilsartan, candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, valsartan) in at least 1 arm. Of 763 RCTs identified, 77 met the eligibility criteria; of which, 37 reported mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline in the office setting and were used to construct the network. A fixed-effects model (FEM) showed the effect of each drug vs. the reference, azilsartan. Using the FEM, the mean (95% credible interval) change from baseline in SBP/DBP for candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, and valsartan was 3.8 (2.9–4.8)/2.6 (2.0–3.1), 4.8 (2.0–7.5)/3.7 (1.8–5.6), 3.0 (0.8–5.1)/1.9 (0.5–3.3), 3.2 (1.2–5.1)/2.7 (1.3–4.1), 3.2 (0.8–5.6)/2.0 (0.3–3.6), and 3.1 (1.1–5.1)/2.4 (1.1–3.8) mmHg, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence that azilsartan has a more favorable efficacy profile than the other ARBs in reducing SBP and DBP. The Japanese Circulation Society 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7932820/ /pubmed/33693183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076 Text en Copyright © 2020, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original article
Nakajima, Tadashi
Oh, Akinori
Saita, Shun
Yoshida, Takuo
Ohishi, Mitsuru
Nishigaki, Nobuhiro
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan ― Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis ―
title_sort comparative effectiveness of angiotensin ii receptor blockers in patients with hypertension in japan ― systematic review and network meta-analysis ―
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7932820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0076
work_keys_str_mv AT nakajimatadashi comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ohakinori comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT saitashun comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yoshidatakuo comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ohishimitsuru comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT nishigakinobuhiro comparativeeffectivenessofangiotensiniireceptorblockersinpatientswithhypertensioninjapansystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis