Cargando…
Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families
Genetic testing in nephrology clinical practice has moved rapidly from a rare specialized test to routine practice both in pediatric and adult nephrology. However, clear information pertaining to the likely outcome of testing is still missing. Here we describe the experience of the accredited Austra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7933190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00184-x |
_version_ | 1783660555950620672 |
---|---|
author | Tanudisastro, Hope A. Holman, Katherine Ho, Gladys Farnsworth, Elizabeth Fisk, Katrina Gayagay, Thet Hackett, Emma Jenkins, Gemma Krishnaraj, Rahul Lai, Tiffany Wong, Karen Patel, Chirag Mallawaarachchi, Amali Mallett, Andrew J. Bennetts, Bruce Alexander, Stephen I. McCarthy, Hugh J. |
author_facet | Tanudisastro, Hope A. Holman, Katherine Ho, Gladys Farnsworth, Elizabeth Fisk, Katrina Gayagay, Thet Hackett, Emma Jenkins, Gemma Krishnaraj, Rahul Lai, Tiffany Wong, Karen Patel, Chirag Mallawaarachchi, Amali Mallett, Andrew J. Bennetts, Bruce Alexander, Stephen I. McCarthy, Hugh J. |
author_sort | Tanudisastro, Hope A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic testing in nephrology clinical practice has moved rapidly from a rare specialized test to routine practice both in pediatric and adult nephrology. However, clear information pertaining to the likely outcome of testing is still missing. Here we describe the experience of the accredited Australia and New Zealand Renal Gene Panels clinical service, reporting on sequencing for 552 individuals from 542 families with suspected kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand. An increasing number of referrals have been processed since service inception with an overall diagnostic rate of 35%. The likelihood of identifying a causative variant varies according to both age at referral and gene panel. Although results from high throughput genetic testing have been primarily for diagnostic purposes, they will increasingly play an important role in directing treatment, genetic counseling, and family planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7933190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79331902021-03-19 Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families Tanudisastro, Hope A. Holman, Katherine Ho, Gladys Farnsworth, Elizabeth Fisk, Katrina Gayagay, Thet Hackett, Emma Jenkins, Gemma Krishnaraj, Rahul Lai, Tiffany Wong, Karen Patel, Chirag Mallawaarachchi, Amali Mallett, Andrew J. Bennetts, Bruce Alexander, Stephen I. McCarthy, Hugh J. NPJ Genom Med Article Genetic testing in nephrology clinical practice has moved rapidly from a rare specialized test to routine practice both in pediatric and adult nephrology. However, clear information pertaining to the likely outcome of testing is still missing. Here we describe the experience of the accredited Australia and New Zealand Renal Gene Panels clinical service, reporting on sequencing for 552 individuals from 542 families with suspected kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand. An increasing number of referrals have been processed since service inception with an overall diagnostic rate of 35%. The likelihood of identifying a causative variant varies according to both age at referral and gene panel. Although results from high throughput genetic testing have been primarily for diagnostic purposes, they will increasingly play an important role in directing treatment, genetic counseling, and family planning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7933190/ /pubmed/33664247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00184-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tanudisastro, Hope A. Holman, Katherine Ho, Gladys Farnsworth, Elizabeth Fisk, Katrina Gayagay, Thet Hackett, Emma Jenkins, Gemma Krishnaraj, Rahul Lai, Tiffany Wong, Karen Patel, Chirag Mallawaarachchi, Amali Mallett, Andrew J. Bennetts, Bruce Alexander, Stephen I. McCarthy, Hugh J. Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title | Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title_full | Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title_fullStr | Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title_full_unstemmed | Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title_short | Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
title_sort | australia and new zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7933190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00184-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanudisastrohopea australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT holmankatherine australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT hogladys australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT farnsworthelizabeth australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT fiskkatrina australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT gayagaythet australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT hackettemma australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT jenkinsgemma australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT krishnarajrahul australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT laitiffany australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT wongkaren australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT patelchirag australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT mallawaarachchiamali australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT mallettandrewj australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT bennettsbruce australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT alexanderstepheni australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families AT mccarthyhughj australiaandnewzealandrenalgenepaneltestinginroutineclinicalpracticeof542families |