Cargando…

Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory

OBJECTIVE: Research on visual working memory has shown that individual stimulus features are processed in both specialized sensory regions and higher cortical areas. Much less evidence exists for auditory working memory. Here, a main distinction has been proposed between the processing of spatial an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erhart, Mira, Czoschke, Stefan, Fischer, Cora, Bledowski, Christoph, Kaiser, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7933450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.637877
_version_ 1783660613545754624
author Erhart, Mira
Czoschke, Stefan
Fischer, Cora
Bledowski, Christoph
Kaiser, Jochen
author_facet Erhart, Mira
Czoschke, Stefan
Fischer, Cora
Bledowski, Christoph
Kaiser, Jochen
author_sort Erhart, Mira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Research on visual working memory has shown that individual stimulus features are processed in both specialized sensory regions and higher cortical areas. Much less evidence exists for auditory working memory. Here, a main distinction has been proposed between the processing of spatial and non-spatial sound features. Our aim was to examine feature-specific activation patterns in auditory working memory. METHODS: We collected fMRI data while 28 healthy adults performed an auditory delayed match-to-sample task. Stimuli were abstract sounds characterized by both spatial and non-spatial information, i.e., interaural time delay and central frequency, respectively. In separate recording blocks, subjects had to memorize either the spatial or non-spatial feature, which had to be compared with a probe sound presented after a short delay. We performed both univariate and multivariate comparisons between spatial and non-spatial task blocks. RESULTS: Processing of spatial sound features elicited a higher activity in a small cluster in the superior parietal lobe than did sound pattern processing, whereas there was no significant activation difference for the opposite contrast. The multivariate analysis was applied using a whole-brain searchlight approach to identify feature-selective processing. The task-relevant auditory feature could be decoded from multiple brain regions including the auditory cortex, posterior temporal cortex, middle occipital gyrus, and extended parietal and frontal regions. CONCLUSION: In summary, the lack of large univariate activation differences between spatial and non-spatial processing could be attributable to the identical stimulation in both tasks. In contrast, the whole-brain multivariate analysis identified feature-specific activation patterns in widespread cortical regions. This suggests that areas beyond the auditory dorsal and ventral streams contribute to working memory processing of auditory stimulus features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7933450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79334502021-03-06 Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory Erhart, Mira Czoschke, Stefan Fischer, Cora Bledowski, Christoph Kaiser, Jochen Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Research on visual working memory has shown that individual stimulus features are processed in both specialized sensory regions and higher cortical areas. Much less evidence exists for auditory working memory. Here, a main distinction has been proposed between the processing of spatial and non-spatial sound features. Our aim was to examine feature-specific activation patterns in auditory working memory. METHODS: We collected fMRI data while 28 healthy adults performed an auditory delayed match-to-sample task. Stimuli were abstract sounds characterized by both spatial and non-spatial information, i.e., interaural time delay and central frequency, respectively. In separate recording blocks, subjects had to memorize either the spatial or non-spatial feature, which had to be compared with a probe sound presented after a short delay. We performed both univariate and multivariate comparisons between spatial and non-spatial task blocks. RESULTS: Processing of spatial sound features elicited a higher activity in a small cluster in the superior parietal lobe than did sound pattern processing, whereas there was no significant activation difference for the opposite contrast. The multivariate analysis was applied using a whole-brain searchlight approach to identify feature-selective processing. The task-relevant auditory feature could be decoded from multiple brain regions including the auditory cortex, posterior temporal cortex, middle occipital gyrus, and extended parietal and frontal regions. CONCLUSION: In summary, the lack of large univariate activation differences between spatial and non-spatial processing could be attributable to the identical stimulation in both tasks. In contrast, the whole-brain multivariate analysis identified feature-specific activation patterns in widespread cortical regions. This suggests that areas beyond the auditory dorsal and ventral streams contribute to working memory processing of auditory stimulus features. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7933450/ /pubmed/33679316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.637877 Text en Copyright © 2021 Erhart, Czoschke, Fischer, Bledowski and Kaiser. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Erhart, Mira
Czoschke, Stefan
Fischer, Cora
Bledowski, Christoph
Kaiser, Jochen
Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title_full Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title_fullStr Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title_short Decoding Spatial Versus Non-spatial Processing in Auditory Working Memory
title_sort decoding spatial versus non-spatial processing in auditory working memory
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7933450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.637877
work_keys_str_mv AT erhartmira decodingspatialversusnonspatialprocessinginauditoryworkingmemory
AT czoschkestefan decodingspatialversusnonspatialprocessinginauditoryworkingmemory
AT fischercora decodingspatialversusnonspatialprocessinginauditoryworkingmemory
AT bledowskichristoph decodingspatialversusnonspatialprocessinginauditoryworkingmemory
AT kaiserjochen decodingspatialversusnonspatialprocessinginauditoryworkingmemory