Cargando…

The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies is still controversially discussed. The current study was designed to analyze the status of qualitative muscle MRI, electromyography (EMG), and muscle biopsy in different cases of clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehmann Urban, Diana, Mohamed, Mohamed, Ludolph, Albert C., Kassubek, Jan, Rosenbohm, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420985256
_version_ 1783660752391897088
author Lehmann Urban, Diana
Mohamed, Mohamed
Ludolph, Albert C.
Kassubek, Jan
Rosenbohm, Angela
author_facet Lehmann Urban, Diana
Mohamed, Mohamed
Ludolph, Albert C.
Kassubek, Jan
Rosenbohm, Angela
author_sort Lehmann Urban, Diana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies is still controversially discussed. The current study was designed to analyze the status of qualitative muscle MRI, electromyography (EMG), and muscle biopsy in different cases of clinically suspected myopathy. METHODS: A total of 191 patients (male: n = 112, female: n = 79) with suspected myopathy who all received muscle MRI, EMG, and muscle biopsy for diagnostic reasons were studied, with the same location of biopsy and muscle MRI (either upper or lower extremities or paravertebral muscles). Muscle MRIs were analyzed using standard rating protocols by two different raters independently. RESULTS: Diagnostic findings according to biopsy results and genetic testing were as follow: non-inflammatory myopathy: n = 65, inflammatory myopathy (myositis): n = 51, neurogenic: n = 18, unspecific: n = 23, and normal: n = 34. The majority of patients showed myopathic changes in the EMG. Edema, atrophy, muscle fatty replacement, and contrast medium enhancement (CM uptake) in MRI were observed across all final diagnostic groups. Only 30% of patients from the myositis group (n = 15) showed CM uptake. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The study provides guidance in the definition of the impact of muscle MRI in suspected myopathy: despite being an important diagnostic tool, qualitative MRI findings could not distinguish different types of neuromuscular diagnostic groups in comparison with the gold standard histopathologic diagnosis and/or genetic testing. The results suggest that neither muscle edema nor gadolinium enhancement are able to secure a diagnosis of myositis. The current results do not support qualitative MRI as aiding in the diagnostic distinction of various myopathies. Quantitative muscle MRI is, however, useful in the diagnostic procedure of a suspected neuromuscular disease, especially with regard to assessing progression of a chronic myopathy by quantification of the degree of atrophy and fatty replacement and in exploring patterns of muscle group involvements in certain genetic myopathies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7934066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79340662021-03-17 The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients Lehmann Urban, Diana Mohamed, Mohamed Ludolph, Albert C. Kassubek, Jan Rosenbohm, Angela Ther Adv Neurol Disord Advances in Neuroimaging BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies is still controversially discussed. The current study was designed to analyze the status of qualitative muscle MRI, electromyography (EMG), and muscle biopsy in different cases of clinically suspected myopathy. METHODS: A total of 191 patients (male: n = 112, female: n = 79) with suspected myopathy who all received muscle MRI, EMG, and muscle biopsy for diagnostic reasons were studied, with the same location of biopsy and muscle MRI (either upper or lower extremities or paravertebral muscles). Muscle MRIs were analyzed using standard rating protocols by two different raters independently. RESULTS: Diagnostic findings according to biopsy results and genetic testing were as follow: non-inflammatory myopathy: n = 65, inflammatory myopathy (myositis): n = 51, neurogenic: n = 18, unspecific: n = 23, and normal: n = 34. The majority of patients showed myopathic changes in the EMG. Edema, atrophy, muscle fatty replacement, and contrast medium enhancement (CM uptake) in MRI were observed across all final diagnostic groups. Only 30% of patients from the myositis group (n = 15) showed CM uptake. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The study provides guidance in the definition of the impact of muscle MRI in suspected myopathy: despite being an important diagnostic tool, qualitative MRI findings could not distinguish different types of neuromuscular diagnostic groups in comparison with the gold standard histopathologic diagnosis and/or genetic testing. The results suggest that neither muscle edema nor gadolinium enhancement are able to secure a diagnosis of myositis. The current results do not support qualitative MRI as aiding in the diagnostic distinction of various myopathies. Quantitative muscle MRI is, however, useful in the diagnostic procedure of a suspected neuromuscular disease, especially with regard to assessing progression of a chronic myopathy by quantification of the degree of atrophy and fatty replacement and in exploring patterns of muscle group involvements in certain genetic myopathies. SAGE Publications 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7934066/ /pubmed/33737953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420985256 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Advances in Neuroimaging
Lehmann Urban, Diana
Mohamed, Mohamed
Ludolph, Albert C.
Kassubek, Jan
Rosenbohm, Angela
The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title_full The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title_fullStr The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title_full_unstemmed The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title_short The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
title_sort value of qualitative muscle mri in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients
topic Advances in Neuroimaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33737953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420985256
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmannurbandiana thevalueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT mohamedmohamed thevalueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT ludolphalbertc thevalueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT kassubekjan thevalueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT rosenbohmangela thevalueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT lehmannurbandiana valueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT mohamedmohamed valueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT ludolphalbertc valueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT kassubekjan valueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients
AT rosenbohmangela valueofqualitativemusclemriinthediagnosticproceduresofmyopathiesabiopsycontrolledstudyin191patients